Literature DB >> 24862139

Predicting recurrent venous thromboembolism in cancer: is it possible?

Paul A Kyrle1.   

Abstract

The association between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well-established. Many clinical and laboratory risk factors of a first cancer-associated VTE have been identified. In contrast, the pathogenesis of recurrent VTE in cancer patients is less well studied. There is only very limited information on the importance of clinical risk factors and the role of biomarkers in this context has never been studied. Patients with cancer-associated VTE usually receive low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 3 to 6 months. Nevertheless, the recurrence risk during anticoagulation is as high as 10% and treatment-related major bleeding is more common in cancer-patient than in non-cancer patients. Thus improvement of current treatment concepts is warranted. One important step to achieve this task is developing strategies that allow distinguishing patients with a high risk of recurrent VTE (who may benefit from prolonged or even intensified anticoagulation) from those with a low risk (i.e. patients in whom a shorter period of anticoagulant treatment at lower dose may be sufficient). Recently, a risk assessment model (RAM) for predicting recurrent VTE has been presented. By combining 4 clinical patient characteristics (sex, cancer type and stage, history of VTE), the Ottawa score allows stratification of cancer patients according to their VTE recurrence risk. The prediction tool was successfully validated in more than 800 patients from 2 prospective VTE treatment studies. Before this RAM can be introduced into routine clinical practice, however, management studies and impact analyses are required.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Prediction; Recurrence; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24862139     DOI: 10.1016/S0049-3848(14)50003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  6 in total

Review 1.  Venous thrombosis and cancer: from mouse models to clinical trials.

Authors:  Y Hisada; J E Geddings; C Ay; N Mackman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Association of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Venous Thromboembolism in Women With Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Aida Moeini; Hiroko Machida; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Erin A Blake; Marianne S Hom; Toshio Miki; Osamu Matsuo; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 3.  Risks, diagnosis, and management of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT): a narrative review.

Authors:  Kodwo Dickson; Kwame Koom-Dadzie; Norman Brito-Dellan; Carmen Escalante
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Implantable port thrombosis in cancer patients: a monocentric experience.

Authors:  Manel Dridi; Nesrine Mejri; Soumaya Labidi; Mehdi Afrit; Houda El Benna; Khaoula Ben Miled; Hamouda Boussen
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.248

Review 5.  Phenotyping the Prediabetic Population-A Closer Look at Intermediate Glucose Status and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Elena Barbu; Mihaela-Roxana Popescu; Andreea-Catarina Popescu; Serban-Mihai Balanescu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Should lifelong anticoagulation for unprovoked venous thromboembolism be revisited?

Authors:  Otto Moodley; Hadi Goubran
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2015-10-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.