Literature DB >> 24861978

Bone formation in sinus augmentation procedures using autologous bone, porcine bone, and a 50 : 50 mixture: a human clinical and histological evaluation at 2 months.

Michele Cassetta1, Vittoria Perrotti2, Sabrina Calasso1, Adriano Piattelli2, Bruna Sinjari2, Giovanna Iezzi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform a 2 months clinical and histological comparison of autologous bone, porcine bone, and a 50 : 50 mixture in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 consecutive patients, undergoing two-stage sinus augmentation procedures using 100% autologous bone (Group A), 100% porcine bone (Group B), and a 50 : 50 mixture of autologous and porcine bone (Group C) were included in this study. After a 2-month healing period, at the time of implant insertion, clinical evaluation was performed and bone core biopsies were harvested and processed for histological analysis.
RESULTS: The postoperative healing was uneventful regardless of the materials used for the sinus augmentation procedures. The histomorphometrical analysis revealed comparable percentages of newly formed bone, marrow spaces, and residual grafted material in the three groups.
CONCLUSION: The clinical and histological results of this study indicated that porcine bone alone or in combination with autologous bone are biocompatible and osteoconductive materials and can be successfully used in sinus augmentation procedures.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous bone; bone regeneration; histology; porcine bone; sinus augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24861978     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  10 in total

Review 1.  Histological and Biological Response to Different Types of Biomaterials: A Narrative Single Research Center Experience over Three Decades.

Authors:  Margherita Tumedei; Eitan Mijiritsky; Carlos Fernando Mourão; Adriano Piattelli; Marco Degidi; Carlo Mangano; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Assessment of Implant Stability in Immediate Implant Placement using Different Bone Grafting materials: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Jalaluddin; Saurabh Sathe; Joyce Thomas; Shaista Haleem; Sachin Naik; Madhuniranjanswamy Mahalakshmamma Shivanna
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 3.  A Narrative Review on the Effectiveness of Bone Regeneration Procedures with OsteoBiol® Collagenated Porcine Grafts: The Translational Research Experience over 20 Years.

Authors:  Tea Romasco; Margherita Tumedei; Francesco Inchingolo; Pamela Pignatelli; Lorenzo Montesani; Giovanna Iezzi; Morena Petrini; Adriano Piattelli; Natalia Di Pietro
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-08-18

4.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Dario Abril-García; Ana Belen Carrillo-Galvez; Federico Zurita; Natividad Martín-Morales; Francisco O'Valle; Miguel Padial-Molina
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis of the Effects of 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Alloy Scaffold Structure on Osteogenic Activity.

Authors:  Zhenchao Xu; Yilu Zhang; Yunqi Wu; Zhen Zhang; Dingyu Jiang; Runze Jia; Xiyang Wang; Zheng Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Histological and micro-computed tomographic observations after maxillary sinus augmentation with porous hydroxyapatite alloplasts: a clinical case series.

Authors:  Hidemi Nakata; Shinji Kuroda; Noriko Tachikawa; Emi Okada; Maho Akatsuka; Shohei Kasugai; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-02

7.  Porcine Collagen-Bone Composite Induced Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Regeneration In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Eisner Salamanca; Chia Chen Hsu; Wan Ling Yao; Cheuk Sing Choy; Yu Hwa Pan; Nai-Chia Teng; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Immediate implant placement in anterior teeth with grafting material of autogenous tooth bone vs xenogenic bone.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Lin Zhou; Jichao Lin; Jiang Chen; Wenxiu Huang; Yonghui Chen
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Computer-Guided Bone Biopsy: A Technical Note with the Description of a Clinical Case.

Authors:  Federica Altieri; Giovanna Iezzi; Valeria Luzzi; Gianni Di Giorgio; Antonella Polimeni; Michele Cassetta
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15

10.  Multiple Ion Scaffold-Based Delivery Platform for Potential Application in Early Stages of Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Èlia Bosch-Rué; Leire Díez-Tercero; Raquel Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Román A Pérez
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.