Megan C Maltby1, Maureen P Flattery2, Brigid Burns3, Jeanne Salyer4, Stephan Weinland5, Keyur B Shah6. 1. Department of Care Coordination. 2. Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System. Electronic address: mflattery@mcvh-vcu.edu. 3. United Network for Organ Sharing. 4. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Nursing. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia. 6. Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (PACT), developed to assess candidates for heart transplant, has not been routinely used to assess left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidacy. We examined the efficacy of the PACT to assess psychosocial outcomes in LVAD patients. METHODS: We reviewed patients who received LVAD implants between June 2006 and April 2011 and retrospectively applied the PACT. We determined the accuracy of identifying social success with the PACT and revised domains to reflect criteria influencing social success for LVAD patients. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (72% men, 44% non-white, 50.4 years old) were divided into high-scoring and low-scoring groups. Nine patients with low PACT scores were falsely categorized as high-risk, whereas 4 with high scores had poor social outcomes. The score had a high positive-predictive value (0.86) but low negative-predictive value (0.31). The PACT was revised (modified [m]PACT) to measure indicators, such as social support and understanding of care requirements, identified to more closely affect LVAD outcome. The mPACT exhibited improved accuracy. A reclassification table was developed, and the net reclassification index was 0.32. The percentage of patients incorrectly classified for social risk decreased from 27% with the PACT to 8% with the mPACT. Patients with higher mPACT scores had decreased 30-day readmission rates (26% vs 67%, p = 0.045) after device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: By emphasizing social support, psychologic health, lifestyle factors, and device understanding, the mPACT showed improved performance in risk-stratifying candidates for LVAD therapy. Prospective validation is warranted.
BACKGROUND: The psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (PACT), developed to assess candidates for heart transplant, has not been routinely used to assess left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidacy. We examined the efficacy of the PACT to assess psychosocial outcomes in LVAD patients. METHODS: We reviewed patients who received LVAD implants between June 2006 and April 2011 and retrospectively applied the PACT. We determined the accuracy of identifying social success with the PACT and revised domains to reflect criteria influencing social success for LVAD patients. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (72% men, 44% non-white, 50.4 years old) were divided into high-scoring and low-scoring groups. Nine patients with low PACT scores were falsely categorized as high-risk, whereas 4 with high scores had poor social outcomes. The score had a high positive-predictive value (0.86) but low negative-predictive value (0.31). The PACT was revised (modified [m]PACT) to measure indicators, such as social support and understanding of care requirements, identified to more closely affect LVAD outcome. The mPACT exhibited improved accuracy. A reclassification table was developed, and the net reclassification index was 0.32. The percentage of patients incorrectly classified for social risk decreased from 27% with the PACT to 8% with the mPACT. Patients with higher mPACT scores had decreased 30-day readmission rates (26% vs 67%, p = 0.045) after device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: By emphasizing social support, psychologic health, lifestyle factors, and device understanding, the mPACT showed improved performance in risk-stratifying candidates for LVAD therapy. Prospective validation is warranted.
Keywords:
left ventricular assist device; modified psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (mPACT); psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (PACT); psychosocial outcomes
Authors: David Snipelisky; John M Stulak; Sarah D Schettle; Shashank Sharma; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Shannon M Dunlay Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-08-16 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ersilia M DeFilippis; Khadijah Breathett; Elena M Donald; Shunichi Nakagawa; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Lauren K Truby; Gabriel Sayer; Paolo C Colombo; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Nir Uriel; Maryjane A Farr; Veli K Topkara Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 8.790