Literature DB >> 24860971

Usability study of clinical exome analysis software: top lessons learned and recommendations.

Casper Shyr1, Andre Kushniruk2, Wyeth W Wasserman3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: New DNA sequencing technologies have revolutionized the search for genetic disruptions. Targeted sequencing of all protein coding regions of the genome, called exome analysis, is actively used in research-oriented genetics clinics, with the transition to exomes as a standard procedure underway. This transition is challenging; identification of potentially causal mutation(s) amongst ∼10(6) variants requires specialized computation in combination with expert assessment. This study analyzes the usability of user interfaces for clinical exome analysis software. There are two study objectives: (1) To ascertain the key features of successful user interfaces for clinical exome analysis software based on the perspective of expert clinical geneticists, (2) To assess user-system interactions in order to reveal strengths and weaknesses of existing software, inform future design, and accelerate the clinical uptake of exome analysis.
METHODS: Surveys, interviews, and cognitive task analysis were performed for the assessment of two next-generation exome sequence analysis software packages. The subjects included ten clinical geneticists who interacted with the software packages using the "think aloud" method. Subjects' interactions with the software were recorded in their clinical office within an urban research and teaching hospital. All major user interface events (from the user interactions with the packages) were time-stamped and annotated with coding categories to identify usability issues in order to characterize desired features and deficiencies in the user experience.
RESULTS: We detected 193 usability issues, the majority of which concern interface layout and navigation, and the resolution of reports. Our study highlights gaps in specific software features typical within exome analysis. The clinicians perform best when the flow of the system is structured into well-defined yet customizable layers for incorporation within the clinical workflow. The results highlight opportunities to dramatically accelerate clinician analysis and interpretation of patient genomic data.
CONCLUSION: We present the first application of usability methods to evaluate software interfaces in the context of exome analysis. Our results highlight how the study of user responses can lead to identification of usability issues and challenges and reveal software reengineering opportunities for improving clinical next-generation sequencing analysis. While the evaluation focused on two distinctive software tools, the results are general and should inform active and future software development for genome analysis software. As large-scale genome analysis becomes increasingly common in healthcare, it is critical that efficient and effective software interfaces are provided to accelerate clinical adoption of the technology. Implications for improved design of such applications are discussed.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exome; Genome; Next-generation sequencing; Software interface; Usability; Whole-genome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24860971     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  7 in total

1.  Initial Usability Evaluation of a Knowledge-Based Population Health Information System: The Population Health Record (PopHR).

Authors:  Mengru Yuan; Guido Powell; Maxime Lavigne; Anya Okhmatovskaia; David L Buckeridge
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 2.  Towards Usable E-Health. A Systematic Review of Usability Questionnaires.

Authors:  Vanessa E C Sousa; Karen Dunn Lopez
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  User-centered design of multi-gene sequencing panel reports for clinicians.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cutting; Meghan Banchero; Amber L Beitelshees; James J Cimino; Guilherme Del Fiol; Ayse P Gurses; Mark A Hoffman; Linda Jo Bone Jeng; Kensaku Kawamoto; Mark Kelemen; Harold Alan Pincus; Alan R Shuldiner; Marc S Williams; Toni I Pollin; Casey Lynnette Overby
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Dynamic software design for clinical exome and genome analyses: insights from bioinformaticians, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors.

Authors:  Casper Shyr; Andre Kushniruk; Clara D M van Karnebeek; Wyeth W Wasserman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Testing of the assisting software for radiologists analysing head CT images: lessons learned.

Authors:  Petr Martynov; Nikolai Mitropolskii; Katri Kukkola; Monika Gretsch; Vesa-Matti Koivisto; Ilkka Lindgren; Jani Saunavaara; Jarmo Reponen; Anssi Mäkynen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Improving Medication Information Presentation Through Interactive Visualization in Mobile Apps: Human Factors Design.

Authors:  Don Roosan; Yan Li; Anandi Law; Huy Truong; Mazharul Karim; Jay Chok; Moom Roosan
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 7.  Visual programming for next-generation sequencing data analytics.

Authors:  Franco Milicchio; Rebecca Rose; Jiang Bian; Jae Min; Mattia Prosperi
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.522

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.