Hao Bai1, Wentao Jiang1, Gregg P Kotchey1, Wissam A Saidi1, Benjamin J Bythell2, Jacqueline M Jarvis2, Alan G Marshall3, Renã A S Robinson1, Alexander Star1. 1. Department of Chemistry and Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States. 2. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University , 1800 E. Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States. 3. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University , 1800 E. Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States ; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University , 95 Chieftain Way, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, United States.
Abstract
Graphene represents an attractive two-dimensional carbon-based nanomaterial that holds great promise for applications such as electronics, batteries, sensors, and composite materials. Recent work has demonstrated that carbon-based nanomaterials are degradable/biodegradable, but little work has been expended to identify products formed during the degradation process. As these products may have toxicological implications that could leach into the environment or the human body, insight into the mechanism and structural elucidation remain important as carbon-based nanomaterials become commercialized. We provide insight into a potential mechanism of graphene oxide degradation via the photo-Fenton reaction. We have determined that after 1 day of treatment intermediate oxidation products (with MW 150-1000 Da) were generated. Upon longer reaction times (i.e., days 2 and 3), these products were no longer present in high abundance, and the system was dominated by graphene quantum dots (GQDs). On the basis of FTIR, MS, and NMR data, potential structures for these oxidation products, which consist of oxidized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, are proposed.
Graphene represents an attractive two-dimensional carbon-based nanomaterial that holds great promise for applications such as electronics, batteries, sensors, and composite materials. Recent work has demonstrated that carbon-based nanomaterials are degradable/biodegradable, but little work has been expended to identify products formed during the degradation process. As these products may have toxicological implications that could leach into the environment or the human body, insight into the mechanism and structural elucidation remain important as carbon-based nanomaterials become commercialized. We provide insight into a potential mechanism of graphene oxide degradation via the photo-Fenton reaction. We have determined that after 1 day of treatment intermediate oxidation products (with MW 150-1000 Da) were generated. Upon longer reaction times (i.e., days 2 and 3), these products were no longer present in high abundance, and the system was dominated by graphene quantum dots (GQDs). On the basis of FTIR, MS, and NMR data, potential structures for these oxidation products, which consist of oxidized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, are proposed.
Graphene, a single
layer of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms
bonded together in a hexagonal lattice, has garnered widespread excitement
within the scientific community as a result of its unique physical
properties.[1−3] These attributes have catalyzed ground-breaking research,
where graphene is employed for applications, including electronics,
batteries, sensors, and composite materials.[1,2,4−6]A bulk, solution-based
methodology for producing graphene-based
derivatives entails exfoliating graphite via chemical oxidation and
subsequently employing sonomechanical treatment to yield graphene
oxide (GO).[7,8] Although the structure of GO has been debated
in the literature,[7] one model holds that
GO consists of sp3-hybridized carbon domains on the basal
plane to which tertiary alcohols and epoxy functional groups are attached;
carboxylic acid, keto, and 5- and 6-membered lactol groups decorate
the edge.[9−12] In addition, there exist nonoxidized sp2 segments that
are either aromatic or conjugated.[11] GO
and its reduced form, reduced GO (rGO), represent carbon-based nanomaterials
that have been utilized for diverse applications, including field-effect
transistor devices, sensors, clean energy devices (e.g., rechargeable
lithium ion batteries (RLBs), and electrochemical double layer capacitors
(EDLCs)).[2]Upon treatment (e.g.,
acid oxidation,[13,14] hydrothermal,[15,16] solvothermal,[17,18] microwave,[19] or the photo-Fenton reaction[20]), GO is susceptible to further oxidation wherein
the epoxy groups are converted into more energetically favorable carbonyl
moieties. This process ruptures the underlying C–C bonds, thereby resulting in the formation of small carbonaceous
particles called graphene quantum dots (GQDs) that contain nanometer-size
aromatic sp2 domains surrounded by oxygen moieties along
the edges.[21] Endowed with photoluminescence
and low cytotoxicity, GQDs hold great promise for biomedical applications
such as bioimaging and drug delivery.[21]A growing area of research entails the biodegradation of carbon-based
nanomaterials to alleviate toxicity of this nanomaterial, facilitate
drug delivery, and promote environmental remediation applications.[22−26] In particular, peroxidases such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP),
myeloperoxidase, and eosinophil peroxidase have been demonstrated
to degrade both carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide. Although the
degradation products of myeloperoxidase were shown not to induce toxicity,[23] recently, the oxidation products (e.g., MW <
3000 Da) of HRP-catalyzed degradation of SWCNTs have been identified
to induce DNA damage;[27] in that study,
however, no structures were identified. Therefore, structural elucidation
of the degradation products of carbon nanomaterials represents a relevant
and fundamentally important step with implications for diverse fields.
In our work, we selected GO and the photo-Fenton reaction to oxidize
this carbon nanomaterial as a result of the relative ease to work
with GO in solution and because the photo-Fenton reaction is a mass
spectrometry (MS) friendly oxidation method.Since the 1894
discovery by Henry Fenton that tartaric acid undergoes
oxidation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and trace amounts of
ferrous salts (i.e., the Fenton reagents),[28] this reaction has been systematically studied,[28−30] developed,[30−36] and expanded to numerous applications[30,31] including
the remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in wastewater.[22,23] It is widely accepted that the oxidative species of the Fenton mechanism
consist of radicals including the highly reactive hydroxyl (·OH)
radical,[37] and the introduction of ultraviolet
(UV) irradiation to the system accelerates the production of this
radical species.[38]Recently, the
Fenton reaction has been employed to degrade carbon-based
nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs)[39] and graphene oxide (GO).[20] In the latter
work, the authors demonstrated that the photo-Fenton reaction was
both an effective and efficient method for oxidizing graphene oxide
into GQDs. In our work, a similar reaction is performed on commercially
fabricated GO. By use of several analytical techniques, specifically
mass spectrometry (MS), attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform
infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, we focus on the identification of a
few intermediate oxidation products (i.e., small molecules with molecular
weights <1000 Da) and GQDs that arise from the photo-Fenton reaction
over the course of several days. In addition, employing atomic force
microscopy (AFM), we monitor the morphological transformation of graphene
oxide flakes. Finally, density functional theory (DFT) calculations
provide insight into the mechanism of degradation/GQD formation. From
these techniques, we demonstrate that the early stage of photo-Fenton-catalyzed
degradation of GO yields small molecules for which we propose plausible
structures based on their tandem MS and NMR spectra. Moreover, after
longer reaction time, we observe the formation of holes on the basal
plane of the GO sheets, and the GO flakes begin to break apart into
individual islands that are known as GQDs.
Experimental Methods
Reagents
and Materials
All of the reagents were used
as received without further purification. Graphene Oxide (GO) (5 mg
mL–1) was purchased from Graphene Laboratories,
Inc. (Calverton, NY) in an aqueous solution. FeCl3 (hexahydrate),
30% H2O2, and concentrated HCl were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO). Solvents, including H2O, ACN, and MeOH were acquired from ThermoFisher Scientific
(Pittsburgh, PA) at HPLC grade or higher.
The Photo-Fenton Reaction
The photo-Fenton reaction
was carried out under vigorous stirring in a 50 mL quartz tube, which
was held ∼6 cm from a UV lamp (Blak-Ray B100AP, 100-W long
wave UV, which produces fluorescence with a ballasted bulb). In a
typical experiment, 500 μL of 5 mg mL–1 GO
aqueous solution, 4.5 μL of 30% H2O2,
100 μL of 1 mM FeCl3, and 24.6 mL nanopure H2O were mixed in the quartz tube. The pH of the mixture was
adjusted to pH 4 with HCl. The tube was sealed and 4.5 μL of
30% H2O2 was added on a daily basis to observe
a complete degradation of GO during 3 days. After the reaction, the
sample was passed through a 0.22 μm TefSep PTFE membrane filter
(GE Infrastructure Water & Process Technologies, Trevose, PA).
Partially oxidized GO was collected, and its mass was measured on
the filter after overnight drying in an oven (ThermoFisher Scientific,
Pittsburgh, PA). The filtrate was dried via lyophilization (Labconco
Freezone 6 Lyophilizer, Kansas City, MO).
AFM
A Veeco Dimension
3100 (Plainview, NY) atomic force
microscope was utilized in tapping mode for thickness, phase, and
sectional analysis. Sample preparation was performed on a freshly
washed Si wafer treated with piranha solution (7:3 concentrated H2SO4/30% H2O2, 70 °C).
Approximately 10 μL of the sample (aq) was spin-coated at 1400
rpm to obtain an evenly distributed sample on the wafer surface.
Raman Spectroscopy
Samples were prepared by spin-coating
approximately 10 μL of graphene oxide solution at day 0, day
1, and day 3 at 1400 rpm on freshly cleaned silica wafers (treated
with piranha solution). All spectra were obtained with a Renishaw
inVia Raman microscope at an excitation wavelength of 633 nm. Ten
scans from 1000 to 3000 cm–1 were acquired and averaged
to determine the D and G band ratio.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
(NMR)
The lyophilized day
1 degradation products were resuspended in D2O to prepare
a solution with a final concentration of ∼5 mg mL–1. NMR spectra, including 1H, 13C, correlated
spectroscopy (COSY), heteronuclear multiple-bond correlation (HMBC),
and heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC) spectra were acquired
by use of a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz NMR spectrometer and a Bruker
Avance III 500 MHz NMR spectrometer (Billerica, MA).
LDI Mass Spectrometry
A Voyager-DE PRO MALDI TOF mass
spectrometer (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA) was utilized for LDI data.
Filtered/lyophilized day 0, 1, and 3 samples were resuspended in nanopure
water at a concentration of 0.2 mg mL–1 and tested
without any matrix. To this end, 10 μL of sample solution was
dropped onto a MALDI plate and dried under ambient conditions. For
data acquisition, the instrument settings were positive reflector
mode; 25 000 V accelerating voltage, grid voltage equals 75%
accelerating voltage, 1.12 mirror to accelerating voltage ratio, 200
ns extraction delay, and 2500 laser intensity with N2 laser
source.
ESI Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry
An LTQ Orbitrap-Velos
mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was employed for mass
spectra acquisition. Filtered/lyophilized day 0, 1, and 3 samples
(1 mg mL–1) were resuspended in 50:50 (v/v) H2O/MeOH or 50:50 (v/v) H2O/ACN with 0.1% formic
acid (FA) and directly infused into the ESI source at a flow rate
of 3 μL min–1. Data were collected in positive
ion mode. The voltage of the ESI tip was held at 4.5 kV, sheath gas
was employed, and the entrance capillary was maintained at 275 °C. Precursor ion mass spectra were obtained in the Orbitrap
at 60 000 nominal resolving power at m/z 400, and selected ions were fragmented in the dual-pressure
LTQ with collision-induced dissociation at normalized collision energy
35% and injection time 25 ms. MS/MS data were recorded in the Orbitrap
at 60 000 nominal resolving power at m/z 400 unless otherwise noted.
ESI-FTICR
These
experiments were performed with a custom-built
9.4 T ESI FT-ICR mass spectrometer recently described in detail.[40,41] Samples were infused into a tapered 50 μm i.d. fused silica
micro-ESI needle[42,43] at a rate of 300–500 nL
min–1 at a concentration of ∼10 μM.
ESI conditions were the following: needle voltage 2 kV and heated
capillary current 4.0 A. One volt was applied to the end-cap and compensation
electrodes of the ICR cell.[41] The analyte
ions were isolated by stored waveform inverse Fourier transform (SWIFT).[44,45] Mass-selective ion ejection and irradiation were implemented with
a Synrad (Mukilteo, WA) CW CO2 laser (λ = 10.6 μm).[46,47] Following irradiation, the remaining precursor and fragment ions
were excited to higher radius and then detected. Typical (uncorrected)
base pressure for the instrument was ≤2 × 10–10 Torr, measured by a Bayard-Alpert ionization gauge.Instrument
control, data acquisition, and data analysis were carried out with
a modular ICR data station.[48] Each time-domain
ICR signal was Hanning apodized,[49] zero-filled
once,[49] and Fourier transformed to generate
a magnitude-mode spectrum that is converted to mass-to-charge ratio
by a two term calibration equation.[50]
Spectrofluorometry
Samples of graphene oxide solution
at day 0, day 1, and day 3 of the photo-Fenton reaction were diluted
5-fold, and their fluorescence spectra were measured with a Fluoromax
3 spectrometer (Horiba Scientific, Edison, NJ, USA). Measurements
were acquired every 0.5 nm from 350 to 625 nm at an excitation wavelength
of 325 nm. Water was employed as the background and subtracted from
the resulting spectra for day 0, day 1, and day 3.
ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy
To obtain IR spectra of both
dried GO and lyophilized samples of products after day 1 of degradation,
a Nicolet iS5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) FTIR spectrometer
outfitted with a diamond ATR accessory was employed. Sixty-four scans
were implemented per sample, and the spectra were treated with ATR
and atmosphere correction.
Density Functional Theory Calculations
The quantum-mechanical
DFT calculations were carried out by use of Gaussian 09,[51] where the exchange-correlation functional was
approximated based on B3LYP.[52−55] The orbitals are expanded by use of a 6-311+G(d,p)
atomic basis set.[56,57] We related all atomic coordinates
with tight convergence thresholds. The GQD was modeled with an armchair
and zigzag edges.
Results
Trace amounts of H2O2 and Fe2+/Fe3+ can be removed
via lyophilization. Therefore, the
photo-Fenton reaction represents an MS-friendly process for elucidating
the intermediate oxidation products of GO. Adjusting the power of
the UV lamp enables effective control over the degradation reaction
rate (Figure 1A). AFM was employed to analyze
the size and thickness of the flakes extracted from the bulk dispersion
of GO. The mean size of this carbon nanomaterial has a broad distribution
of 589 ± 700 nm, and the flake thickness is 0.972 nm, which represents
a single-layer of GO (Supporting Information Figure S1).[58,59] After 1 day of incubation under
the photo-Fenton conditions, the GO flakes in the dispersion are more
narrowly distributed in size, undergo ∼40% reduction to 358
± 186 nm, and demonstrate a thickness increase of ∼15%
versus day 0, which may be attributed to further oxidation. After
the photo-Fenton reaction proceeds for 3 days, small particles with
a mean diameter of 36 ± 10 nm and thickness ranging from 2 to
5 nm are present. These data indicate that graphene quantum dots (GQDs)
are successfully formed from the oxidation of GO, and in the bulk
dispersion the GQDs exist as multiple layers due to van der Waals
interactions.
Figure 1
(A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the degradation of
graphene
oxide (GO) via the photo-Fenton reaction, which results in the formation
of oxidized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (o-PAH) intermediates
and graphene quantum dots (GQDs) products with time. (B) AFM images
of as-received GO after reaction with the Fenton reagent under UV
irradiation for 0, 18, 36, and 54 h. All images were obtained in tapping
mode, and the scale bars are 500 nm.
(A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the degradation of
graphene
oxide (GO) via the photo-Fenton reaction, which results in the formation
of oxidized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (o-PAH) intermediates
and graphene quantum dots (GQDs) products with time. (B) AFM images
of as-received GO after reaction with the Fenton reagent under UV
irradiation for 0, 18, 36, and 54 h. All images were obtained in tapping
mode, and the scale bars are 500 nm.To analyze the morphological changes of the same individual
GO
flakes, a dispersion consisting of GO was spin-coated onto a Si wafer,
and the GO/Si substrate was subsequently subjected to the photo-Fenton
reaction at 18 h intervals (Figure 1B). AFM
section analysis demonstrates that after 18 h, the thickness of the
GO flakes increases by ∼80% (i.e., from around 1.41 ±
0.36 to 2.49 ± 0.14 nm, Supporting Information Figure S2A,B). To ascertain the origin of the thickness increase,
control experiments were conducted (Supporting
Information Figure S3). After 18 h under UV exposure without
the Fenton reagents, the thickness of the GO remains roughly the same
(i.e., a 4% increase in thickness over 36 h); a similar trend was
likewise observed when the Fenton reagents were present in solution
in the absence of UV exposure (i.e., a 5% decrease in thickness over
36 h). Therefore, given the absence of a significant change in thickness
for the controls, one plausible explanation for the observed change
in thickness after 18 h of UV-driven oxidation could be the formation
of reaction products that adsorb to the GO sheet thereby forming an
additional layer. After an additional 18 h of the photo-Fenton reaction
(i.e., a total of 36 h), holes were
observed on the basal plane of the GO sheets, and the overall thickness
of the flakes decreased by 56 and 22% relative to 18 and 0 h (Supporting Information Figure S2D). Finally,
after 54 h of the photo-Fenton reaction, most of the GO flakes were
oxidized into GQDs with a thickness of 2.04 nm (Supporting Information Figure S2E).Raman spectroscopy
was employed to further analyze the oxidation
of GO catalyzed by the photo-Fenton reaction. For the sample that
consists of GO in solution, the ratio of the defect induced D-band
relative to the G-band, which results from the stretching of C–C
bonds in a graphitic lattice (i.e., the D/G ratio)[60] decreases by 19% from 2.19 at day 0 to 1.84 by day 1, and
no bands that are characteristic of GO are observed at day 3 (Supporting Information Figure S4A). On the other
hand, for the sample that was spin-coated onto the Si substrate, the
Raman signature for GO, which initially had a D/G ratio of 2.28, is
not observed after 18 h of the photo-Fenton reaction (Supporting Information Figure S4B).As
seen in Figure 2A, the GO solution, which
is initially dark brown in color, became lighter and virtually colorless
with time, this providing empirical evidence of GO oxidation catalyzed
by the photo-Fenton reaction. The fluorescence of the starting material
(i.e., GO) and products derived from the photo-Fenton reaction after
1 and 3 days was examined (Figure 2B). Upon
excitation at 325 nm, GO demonstrates a broad peak that is centered
on 430 nm. By day 1, the fluorescent intensity increased 154% versus
day 0, and its spectrum is both broad and centered on 430 nm. Finally,
the fluorescence intensity on day 3 increases 1814 and 1175% versus
day 0 and 1, and its sharp peak is centered at ∼440 nm. This
increase in fluorescence provides evidence that GO is broken down
into conjugated products (e.g., oxidized PAHs and/or GQDs).
Figure 2
(A) Photograph
depicting vials of graphene oxide solution after
0, 1, and 3 days of the photo-Fenton reaction. (B) Fluorescence spectra
of the solutions contained in (A). (C) LDI-TOF MS and (D) Orbitrap
ESI-MS spectra for sample after 0, 1, and 3 days of the photo-Fenton
reaction.
(A) Photograph
depicting vials of graphene oxide solution after
0, 1, and 3 days of the photo-Fenton reaction. (B) Fluorescence spectra
of the solutions contained in (A). (C) LDI-TOF MS and (D) Orbitrap
ESI-MS spectra for sample after 0, 1, and 3 days of the photo-Fenton
reaction.MS was implemented to elucidate
the products of oxidation. Figure 2C depicts
the laser desorption ionization (LDI)
time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectra corresponding to products obtained
at days 0, 1, and 3 after the start of the photo-Fenton reaction.
The LDI TOF MS data reveal the presence of carbon clusters ranging
from 1000 to 5000 Da (∼C100 to C400)
in the day 0 and day 1 sample (Figure 2C);
these large clusters are not observed in the day 3 sample (Figure 2C). Carbon cluster peaks are spaced by 24 Da across
the mass spectra and correspond to the mass of two carbon atoms. It
should be noted that because these peaks correspond to carbon clusters
smaller in size than the flakes detected by AFM, these clusters may
represent fragments generated via laser ablation of larger flakes
of GO. By day 3, large GO flakes are broken down into smaller quantum
dots (as evidenced by AFM); therefore, the carbon cluster ions do
not appear in the MS spectrum.Figure 2D displays the electrospray ionization
(ESI)-Orbitrap MS spectra of degradation products on days 0, 1, and
3. As observed from the spectra, larger magnitude signal and features
are present on day 1 in comparison to days 0 and 3. In particular,
numerous peaks are detected from m/z 300–1000 on day 1.The ESI-Orbitrap MS findings for
day 1 degradation products were
compared to MS data obtained by 9.4 T ESI Fourier transform ion cyclotron
resonance (FT-ICR) MS. Supporting Information Figure S5 compares the precursor ion mass spectra obtained. There
is considerable overlap between ions observed from both analyses despite
variations in the magnitude of signal, which may be partially attributable
to inherent differences in the source conditions.High mass
measurement accuracy obtainable with both instruments
was used to make assignments of elemental composition. Because of
the complexity of the data sets, however, only selected species were
isolated and exposed to gas-phase fragmentation in order to better
deduce chemical composition and possible structures.For example,
peaks at m/z 149.024,
163.040, 189.017, and 203.032, which have the greatest magnitude in
the parent scans of the Orbitrap MS data, demonstrate the fragmentation
patterns observed in Figure 3 and Supporting Information Figure S6. In the low m/z region of the parent spectrum (Orbitrap
MS), a series of peaks related to phthalic acid is observed as follows:
the protonated phthalic acid peak (m/z 167.034, [C8H6O4 + H]+, −0.56 ppm), a potassiated acid peak (m/z 204.990, [C8H6O4 + K]+, −0.81 ppm), protonated phthalic anhydride (m/z 149.024, [C8H4O3 + H]+, −0.06 ppm), and the fragment
species of protonated phthalic anhydride with the loss of a neutral
CO molecule (m/z 121.029, [C7H4O2 + H]+, −1.61
ppm). To confirm the assignment of these peaks, a standard solution
of phthalic acid was also analyzed by ESI-Orbitrap MS and the mass
spectrum has similar distributions in the precursor and MS/MS data
from the day 1 sample (Supporting Information Figure S6). Building on the phthalic acid peaks, the ion at m/z 181.050 (Figure 3B) has been assigned to monomethyl phthalate. The monomethyl phthalate
ion was observed in the parent spectrum both as a sodiated acid precursor
(m/z 203.032, [C9H8O4 + Na]+, 1.83 ppm) and as the protonated
anhydrous monomethyl phthalate species (m/z 163.040, [C9H6O3 + H]+, −0.12 ppm). MS/MS of m/z 181.050 produces fragment peaks corresponding to the loss of methanol
and water. The anhydride at m/z 163.040
undergoes two fragmentation pathways (Figure 3A) corresponding to neutral losses of CO or CH2O. Further
support for these assignments is provided by the MS/MS results for
the sodiated adduct of monomethyl phthalate (Figure 3C). A single fragment peak corresponding to the loss of the
neutral methanol is observed. The significant energetic barrier to
loss of neutral NaOH (305 kJ mol–1) from the protonated,
cyclic anhydride species prevents the alternate fragmentation pathway.
We note that a fragment peak corresponding to the loss of water would
be expected if the methyl group were a substituent on the benzene
ring. Some B3LYP/6-31+g(d,p) calculations relevant to the above discussion
are shown in Supporting Information Scheme
S1.
Figure 3
Orbitrap MS/MS results for precursor ions of m/z (A) 163.040, (B) 181.050, and (C) 203.032. Structures
for (A–C) and proposed fragmentation pathways are shown on
the right.
Orbitrap MS/MS results for precursor ions of m/z (A) 163.040, (B) 181.050, and (C) 203.032. Structures
for (A–C) and proposed fragmentation pathways are shown on
the right.On the basis of the errors associated
with the peaks in the precursor
and fragment mass spectra and the associated calculated degrees of
unsaturation, aromatic rings and the presence of C=O bonds
are necessary. Structural information is limited to adjacent aromatic
rings or anhydride structures. The ion observed at m/z 389.01855 in both data sets was selected for
FT-ICR MS/MS (Figure 4). This species was assigned
an elemental composition ([C16H13O9Ca]+, −0.3 ppm error) based upon isotopic verification
(Figure 4). After short irradiation periods
(Figure 4, top and middle), sequential neutral
losses of m/z 18 yielded a fragment
ion at m/z 352.99721 ([C16H9O7Ca1]+. After longer
irradiation (Figure 4, bottom), an additional
neutral loss of m/z 148 (C8H4O3) was observed (also by Orbitrap MS/MS).
Figure 4
FT-ICR
mass spectra following IRMPD fragmentation of precursor
ion (m/z 389.01805, [C16H13O9Ca]+) after irradiation for
500, 1000, and 1500 ms.
FT-ICR
mass spectra following IRMPD fragmentation of precursor
ion (m/z 389.01805, [C16H13O9Ca]+) after irradiation for
500, 1000, and 1500 ms.Similar FT-ICR MS/MS behavior is seen in Supporting
Information Figure S7, for precursor ions of m/z 703 ([C32H23O16Ca]+, this time with successive neutral losses of C8H6O4, which is also observed in Orbitrap
MS/MS (data not shown). It is worth noting that elemental compositions
could be assigned to other neutral losses, even in cases for which
the precursor ion composition could not be assigned. Thus, we have
high confidence in the assignments for neutral losses.The difficulty
in assigning elemental compositions is illustrated
by Supporting Information Table S1, listing
the accurate masses of the 20 most abundant species observed by FT-ICR
MS. Even with internal calibration, about half of the peaks could
not be assigned by allowing for up to one Na, one K, and two Ca atoms
in addition to C, H, and O. It should be noted that in each case we
required resolution and identification of at least one heavy heteroatom
isotope (e.g., 18O, 40K, 43Ca) with
mass spectral peak magnitude greater than 6σ of baseline noise
for valid assignment. One could of course allow for more elements;
however, the number of possible elemental compositions thereby also
increases, so that even higher mass resolving power is needed. In
any case, our intent was not to achieve complete compositional assignment,
but rather to identify major components (and fragmentation losses)
confidently.Overall, the ESI-MS data point to the presence
of degradation products
that are higher in abundance at day 1 than for days 0 and 3. This
observation supports the hypothesis that oxygen sites on GO are oxidized
immediately after the initiation of the photo-Fenton reaction, and
when combined with the degradation of GO flakes, intermediate species
(with MW 150–1000) are generated by day 1. After a period of
time between day 1 and 3, these intermediates are no longer prominently
present, and the system is dominated by GQDs.Further evidence
for the proposed functional groups of the day
1 degradation products was assessed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and three types of 2D NMR, including correlation spectroscopy
(COSY), heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC) for direct
C–H coupling, and heteronuclear multiple bond coherence (HMBC)
for 2–4 bond coupling.The 1H NMR spectrum
in D2O (Figure 5A) indicates the
presence of aromatic protons (i.e.,
7.61 and 7.49 ppm), methyl benzoate protons (4.03 ppm) and signals
that can be assigned to benzyl protons in the region of 2.5 to 2.8
ppm. Because there exists a possibility of exchange with the deuterium
in the solvent, no signals from labile protons, such as −COOH
and/or −OH, were observed. The COSY spectrum (Figure 5B) depicts the proton coupling through a limited
number of chemical bonds (usually less than 4). The peaks can be divided
into two groups: diagonal peaks sharing the same frequency coordinate
as each axis and off-diagonal or cross peaks indicating the couplings
between pairs of protons. The latter is what we want to focus on.
The blue arrow segment can be assigned to the multiple aromatic protons,
and the green arrow indicates the coupling between methyl/benzyl protons.
The red arrow denotes coupling between benzyl protons and ortho hydrogens
on aromatic rings.
Figure 5
(A) 1D 1H NMR spectrum (D2O) and
(B) 2D correlation
(COSY) NMR spectrum of the day 1 oxidation products produced via the
photo-Fenton reaction with GO.
(A) 1D 1H NMR spectrum (D2O) and
(B) 2D correlation
(COSY) NMR spectrum of the day 1 oxidation products produced via the
photo-Fenton reaction with GO.Although not enough information is available about the functional
groups obtained from proton NMR subject to the proton exchange mentioned
above, the 13C spectrum (Supporting
Information Figure S8A) indicates characteristic peaks for
aromatic carbons (128–132 ppm) and carboxylic acid groups (172
ppm). Therefore, the 13C spectrum supports the presence
of oxygen-containing functional groups. In HMQC (Supporting Information Figure S8B), which represents the direct
C–H coupling, the relationship between adjacent hydrogen and
carbon nuclei is reflected. Besides aromatic protons, various oxygen-containing
functional groups, as expected, can appear in the oxidation products.
Although the degree of unsaturation is high, as noted from the MS
data, there are still methyl protons. In addition to the direct coupling,
HMBC (Supporting Information Figure S9),
indicating coherent 2–4 bond coupling, provided strong evidence
of carboxylic acid functionality, aiding in structural elucidation.Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy was employed to elucidate further insight
into the functional groups in the degradation products. The spectrum
of GO was compared to the degradation products formed after 1 day
of the photo-Fenton reaction (Supporting Information Figure S10). For both samples, the peaks overlapped and were identified
at 3465 (C–OH vibrations), 2997, 2914, 1735 (C=O, carboxyl),
1428, 1365 (epoxide, C–O–C), and 1215 cm–1 (C=O).[61] Therefore, the ATR-FTIR
data indicate that the products at day 1 contain similar functional
groups as GO, including carboxyl functional groups.
Discussion
Insight into the mechanism of photo-Fenton-catalyzed oxidation
of graphene oxide can be inferred from previous experiments, in which
the Fenton reaction was employed to generate hydroxyl radicals, which
subsequently reacted with carbon nanotubes (CNTs).[62] In that work, hydroxyl radicals oxidized CNTs by two mechanisms.
First, in an approximately single-phase reaction, the hydroxyl radicals
imparted carboxylic acids at the defect sites, and these oxygen moieties
were subsequently further oxidized to CO2 and H2O.[62] For the second pathway, hydroxyl
radicals undergo electrophilic addition on unsaturated bonds yielding
hydroxylated CNTs.[62] Next, the hydroxylated
CNTs undergo further oxidation whereby the hydroxyl groups were converted
into quinones.[62] Finally, the strong oxidizing
environment facilitates the conversion of the quinone groups to carboxylic
acids, which can be further broken down into CO2 and H2O.[62] In this work, our starting
material, GO, already consists of sp3-hybridized carbon
domains on the basal plane to which tertiary alcohols and epoxy functional
groups are attached; carboxylic acid, keto, and 5- and 6-membered
lactol groups decorate the edge.[9−12] Moreover, there exist nonoxidized sp2 segments
that are either aromatic or conjugated.[11] We hypothesize that in a similar fashion to CNTs, hydroxyl radicals
will further oxidize GO via both the conversion of oxygen moieties
to higher oxidation states and electrophilic addition to unsaturated
bonds. The latter process will result in the formation of hydroxyl
groups, which, in turn, can be further oxidized by the former mechanism.As evidenced from the NMR and MS data, aromatic protons are formed
from GO via a decarboxylation mechanism. Therefore, DFT calculations
were implemented to acquire greater insight into decarboxylation.
To this end, initially GQDs were functionalized with both a carboxylic
acid and a keto group, which could be present on either an armchair
edge (Figure 6A) or a zigzag edge (Figure 6B). The probable transition state consists of the
conversion of the keto to an alcohol through the deprotonation of
the acid followed by the decarboxylation of the carboxylic acid to
CO2 (g). In this case, the transition state is ∼0.6
eV higher than the initial state for the armchair edge (Figure 6A) and ∼2.3 eV higher for the zigzag configuration
(Figure 6B). It should be noted that in solution
these transitions states would be lower in energy than predicted by
this simple model, as a proton can easily be transferred from solution
to satisfy the dangling bond of the peripheral carbon atom in the
GQD that was bonded to the carboxylic group. The relatively high-energy
barrier of the transition state in the zigzag configuration indicates
that the dangling bond is highly unsaturated compared to the armchair
termination. The final state consists of the formation of a keto group,
where the proton jumps back to the location where the carboxylic acid
existed to satisfy the dangling bond; the final state is ∼0.6
eV lower than the initial state for the armchair edge (Figure 6A) and ∼0.7 eV lower for the zigzag edge
(Figure 6B). Although the present model ignores
solvent effects and defects, the results show that the decarboxylation
is exothermic and thermodynamically very favorable.
Figure 6
The initial configuration
(left), the transition state, where the
proton of the carboxylic acid jumps to the carbonyl group and the
CO2 desorbs in the gas phase (center), and the final configuration
of the GQD, where the proton returns to the location to which the
carboxylic acid existed to satisfy the dangling bond (right) for (A)
armchair and (B) zigzag configurations of a GQD based on DFT calculations.
The initial configuration
(left), the transition state, where the
proton of the carboxylic acid jumps to the carbonyl group and the
CO2 desorbs in the gas phase (center), and the final configuration
of the GQD, where the proton returns to the location to which the
carboxylic acid existed to satisfy the dangling bond (right) for (A)
armchair and (B) zigzag configurations of a GQD based on DFT calculations.AFM and fluorescence spectroscopy
provided plausible evidence that
GQDs were being formed via the photo-Fenton reaction, consistent with
the literature.[20] Accordingly, the flakes
of GO, which initially demonstrated a broad distribution of 589 ±
700 nm, underwent significant oxidation whereby the flake size was
reduced to 36 ± 10 nm. To this end, GO is oxidized by hydroxyl
radicals, which were generated via the photo-Fenton reaction, to yield
nanometer-sized aromatic sp2 domains that are surrounded
by oxygen moieties along the edges.[21] These
aromatic domains should be the source of the GQDs fluorescent properties.[21] This result was observed experimentally: the
fluorescence intensity was ∼19 times greater for the GQD products
at day 3 versus GO at day 0 at an emission wavelength of 440 nm.MS analyses support the degradation of photo-Fenton oxidized GO
into GQDs through the formation of intermediate structures that are
highly conjugated and full of carboxylic and hydroxyl moieties. In
order to understand the fragmentation nature of carboxylic acid groups
on aromatic structures, mellitic acid was investigated in the Orbitrap
MS. A precursor mass spectrum reveals a protonated precursor and abundant
ions representing the loss of one, two, and three water molecules
from the precursor (Supporting Information Figure S11). Anhydrous forms of mellitic acid are more stable than
the protonated precursor under gas-phase MS conditions (Supporting Information Figure S11A). Following
MS/MS, the fragmentation patterns show that the precursor is lost
and multiple species representing losses of CO and CO2 neutrals
from the anhydride group are observed (Supporting
Information Figure S11B). The sequential losses from the anhydride
lead to the formation of stable gas-phase species.The behavior
of mellitic and phthlatic acid with positive mode
ESI-MS can be used to make the following assumptions about the day
1 degradation parent MS spectra. (1) The degradation spectra contain
signal from the protonated precursor and peaks associated with loss
of neutrals (i.e., H2O, CO, and CO2) for carboxylic
acids. (2) The degradation spectra may also contain a signal from
the acid with different cations (i.e, H+, Na+, K+, and Ca2+) which is expected for ESI.[63] These two factors add to the complexity of the
parent MS data for degradation products. Furthermore, the coisolation
of precursors that are close in m/z produces MS/MS spectra that are difficult to assign at the resolving
power of the Orbitrap.It is apparent from the MS and MS/MS
data, however, that phthalate
species exist.[64,65] In addition to the low m/z peaks that correspond to phthalic anhydride
and acid, several peaks with higher m/z show losses corresponding to neutral phthalic anhydride or acid
molecules (low ppm Orbitrap errors). Such species may arise from homogeneous
and heterogeneous clusters of phthalate species with various cations.
The presence of a peak at m/z 149.024
is diagnostic for phthalates detected by various ionization sources
in MS.[64−66] This ion is present in the ESI-Orbitrap MS data for
degradation samples. Phthalates are common contaminants in plasticizers[67] and arise as background ions in ESI-MS.[68] The presence of these species in GO degradation
samples indicates either their formation during degradation of GO
flakes or increased extraction of these species from sample vials
after the degradation process. Samples were handled in glassware during
the degradation and transferred to Eppendorf vials for MS analysis.
Thus, the introduction of these species could only arise after the
degradation process from the pipet tips, Eppendorf vials, or solvents
used for MS analysis if they were not present a priori in the sample.
The magnitude of signals corresponding to the protonated phthalic
anhydride (m/z 149.024) and phthalic
acid (m/z 167.040) peaks increases
by three and two orders of magnitude from day 0 (control) to day 1
samples. There is a decrease in the relative signal of these peaks
of 92 and 43%, respectively, from day 1 to day 3 samples. Further
separation prior to MS will be necessary in order to fully understand
all of the observed degradation products.In summary, the flakes
of GO underwent morphological changes and
resulted in the production of GQDs as evidenced by AFM; this transformation
is indicative of oxidation/degradation driven via the photo-Fenton
reaction. MS analysis demonstrated that intermediate products were
formed during the conversion of GO into GQDs. By combining MS, NMR,
and ATR-FTIR data, plausible structure(s) of these intermediate products,
which largely consist of adjacent aromatic rings with carboxylic acid
groups, are proposed. Furthermore, DFT calculations demonstrated that
the decarboxylation step is both exothermic and thermodynamically
very favorable. Given that carbon nanomaterials such as graphene and
carbon nanotubes are likely to undergo transformations including degradation
that results in the formation of oxidized products[22−26] that may demonstrate toxicity,[27] our research represents an important step forward toward
understanding the medical and environmental implications of such a
promising nanomaterial.
Authors: Brett L Allen; Padmakar D Kichambare; Pingping Gou; Irina I Vlasova; Alexander A Kapralov; Nagarjun Konduru; Valerian E Kagan; Alexander Star Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Nathan K Kaiser; Joshua J Savory; Amy M McKenna; John P Quinn; Christopher L Hendrickson; Alan G Marshall Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Sofia Jonsson; Ylva Persson; Sofia Frankki; Bert van Bavel; Staffan Lundstedt; Peter Haglund; Mats Tysklind Journal: J Hazard Mater Date: 2007-03-25 Impact factor: 10.588
Authors: David G Goodwin; Adeyemi S Adeleye; Lipiin Sung; Kay T Ho; Robert M Burgess; Elijah J Petersen Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Maha T Abutokaikah; Giri R Gnawali; Joseph W Frye; Curtis M Stump; John Tschampel; Matthew J Murphy; Eli S Lachance; Shanshan Guan; Christopher D Spilling; Benjamin J Bythell Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.109