Literature DB >> 24859997

Predictors of host specificity among behavior-manipulating parasites.

B L Fredensborg1.   

Abstract

A trade-off between resource-specialization and the breadth of the ecological niche is one of the most fundamental biological characteristics. A true generalist (Jack-of-all-trades) displays a broad ecological niche with little resource specialization while the opposite is true for a resource-specialist that has a restricted ecological niche that it masters. Parasites that manipulate hosts' behavior are often thought to represent resource-specialists based on a few spectacular examples of manipulation of the host's behavior. However, the determinants of which, and how many, hosts a manipulating parasite can exploit (i.e., niche breadth) are basically unknown. Here, I present an analysis based on published records of the use of hosts by 67 species from 38 genera of helminths inducing parasite increased trophic transmission, a widespread strategy of parasites that has been reported from many taxa of parasites and hosts. Using individual and multivariate analyses, I examined the effect of the host's and parasite's taxonomy, location of the parasite in the host, type of behavioral change, and the effect of debilitation on host-specificity, measured as the mean taxonomic relatedness of hosts that a parasite can manipulate. Host-specificity varied substantially across taxa suggesting great variation in the level of resource-specialization among manipulating parasites. Location of the parasite, level of debilitation, and type of host were all significant predictors of host-specificity. More specifically, hosts' behavioral modification that involves interaction with the central nervous system presumably restricts parasites to more closely related hosts than does manipulation of the host's behavior via debilitation of the host's physiology. The results of the analysis suggest that phylogenetic relatedness of hosts is a useful measure of host-specificity in comparative studies of the complexity of interactions taking place between manipulating parasites and their hosts.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859997     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icu051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  4 in total

1.  A keeper of many crypts: a behaviour-manipulating parasite attacks a taxonomically diverse array of oak gall wasp species.

Authors:  Anna K G Ward; Omar S Khodor; Scott P Egan; Kelly L Weinersmith; Andrew A Forbes
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Filtering out parasites: sand crabs (Lepidopa benedicti) are infected by more parasites than sympatric mole crabs (Emerita benedicti).

Authors:  Zen Faulkes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  A novel intermediate host for Taenia serialis (Gervais, 1847): The European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L. 1758) from the Monti Sibillini National Park (MSNP), Italy.

Authors:  Benedetto Morandi; Alessandra Bazzucchi; Sofia Gambini; Silvia Crotti; Deborah Cruciani; Federico Morandi; Maira Napoleoni; Toni Piseddu; Alessandra Di Donato; Stefano Gavaudan
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  How cunning is the puppet-master? Cestode-infected fish appear generally fearless.

Authors:  P Andreas Svensson; Ramin Eghbal; Ramona Eriksson; Emelie Nilsson
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.383

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.