Literature DB >> 24859939

Predicting the extent of nodal disease in early-stage breast cancer.

Abigail S Caudle1, Henry M Kuerer, Huong T Le-Petross, Wei Yang, Min Yi, Isabelle Bedrosian, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Bruno D Fornage, Kelly K Hunt, Elizabeth A Mittendorf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of regional nodal ultrasound (US) has been questioned since publication of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 data. The goal of this study was to determine if imaging and clinicopathologic features could predict the extent of axillary nodal involvement in breast cancer. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients with T1-T2 tumors who underwent regional nodal US and axillary lymph node dissection from 2002 to 2012 were identified from a prospective database excluding those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients whose metastases were identified by US confirmed by needle biopsy were compared with those identified by sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) after a negative US.
RESULTS: Metastases were identified by US in 190 patients, and by SLND in 518 patients. SLND patients had fewer positive nodes (2.2 vs. 4.1; p < 0.0001), smaller metastases (5.3 vs. 13.8 mm; p < 0.0001), and a lower incidence of extranodal extension (24 vs. 53 %; p < 0.0001) than the US group. Even when US identified ≤2 abnormal nodes, patients were still more likely to have ≥3 positive nodes (45 %) than SLND patients (19 %; p < 0.001). After adjusting for tumor size, receptor status, and histology, multivariate analysis revealed that metastases identified by US [odds ratio (OR) 4.01; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.75-5.84] and lobular histology (OR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.06-2.95) predicted having ≥3 positive nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging and clinicopathologic features can be used to predict the extent of nodal involvement. Patients with US-detected metastases, even if small volume, have a higher burden of nodal involvement than patients with SLND-detected metastases and may not be comparable with patients in the ACOSOG Z0011 trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859939     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3813-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  30 in total

1.  Usefulness of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging with a dedicated axillary sequence for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Shin Ahn; Mijung Jang; Sun Mi Kim; Bo La Yun; Soo Hyun Lee
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Evaluation of axillary lymph node metastasis burden by preoperative ultrasound in early-stage breast cancer with needle biopsy-proven metastasis.

Authors:  X Wang; L Chen; Y Sun; B Zhang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Therese Bevers; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin Smith; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Prediction of axillary nodal burden in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma using MRI.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Jung Min Chang; Soo-Yeon Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Eun Sil Kim; Yeon Soo Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Restricted Axillary Staging in Clinically and Sonographically Node-Negative Early Invasive Breast Cancer (c/iT1-2) in the Context of Breast Conserving Therapy: First Results Following Commencement of the Intergroup-Sentinel-Mamma (INSEMA) Trial.

Authors:  T Reimer; A Stachs; V Nekljudova; S Loibl; S Hartmann; K Wolter; G Hildebrandt; B Gerber
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Is Preoperative Axillary Imaging Beneficial in Identifying Clinically Node-Negative Patients Requiring Axillary Lymph Node Dissection?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Maxine Jochelson; Jessica C Gooch; Sujata Patil; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Lobular Histology Does Not Predict the Need for Axillary Dissection Among ACOSOG Z0011-Eligible Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  The impact of preoperative axillary ultrasonography in T1 breast tumours.

Authors:  Javier del Riego; María Jesús Diaz-Ruiz; Milagros Teixidó; Judit Ribé; Mariona Vilagran; Lydia Canales; Melcior Sentís
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Assessment of Ultrasound Features Predicting Axillary Nodal Metastasis in Breast Cancer: The Impact of Cortical Thickness.

Authors:  A Stachs; A Tra-Ha Thi; M Dieterich; J Stubert; S Hartmann; Ä Glass; T Reimer; B Gerber
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2015-07

10.  Identification and Resection of Clipped Node Decreases the False-negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Patients Presenting With Node-positive Breast Cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance).

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Karla V Ballman; Huong T Le-Petross; Linda M McCall; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; Eric C Feliberti; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.