Literature DB >> 24859575

Time-dependent response of scoliotic curvature to orthotic intervention: when should a radiograph be obtained after putting on or taking off a spinal orthosis?

Meng Li1, M S Wong, Keith D K Luk, Kenneth W H Wong, Kenneth M C Cheung.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study; 2-group design.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the time response of scoliotic spines to orthotic intervention using clinical ultrasound. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are generally advised orthotic treatment. However, the time to reach maximum correction after donning spinal orthosis or the time to return to pretreatment curvature after doffing spinal orthosis is not fully understood.
METHOD: Subjects were divided into 2 groups, the don-orthosis group and the doff-orthosis group where the time reaching maximum correction and the time returning to pretreatment curvature were investigated accordingly. To avoid excessive radiation exposure via obtaining repeated radiographs, a validated method of estimating Cobb angle using radiation-free clinical ultrasound was applied at an interval of every 30 minutes up to 180 minutes. The spinal flexibility (estimated from supine radiographs) and body mass index were collected from the subjects for analyses. RESULT: Nine female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were recruited. There was no immediate change in the Cobb angles. A change of more than 5° could be observed in both groups only after 30 minutes and maximum change was found at/after 120 minutes. In the doff-orthosis group, the subject with the lowest body mass index took the longest time to increase more than 5° after doffing spinal orthosis. In the don-orthosis group, the subject with the highest body mass index took the longest time to achieve curve correction more than 5°.
CONCLUSION: This investigation demonstrated that there is a time lag between application of spinal orthosis and its effect on scoliotic curvature. This is likely due to the low-stiff and viscoelastic properties of the spine. The clinical relevance of this study is that for patients with scoliosis undergoing orthotic treatment, radiograph should not be obtained within 2 hours of putting on or taking off spinal orthosis because it may not show the maximum effect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859575     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Does curve pattern impact on the effects of physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises on Cobb angles of participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A prospective clinical trial with two years follow-up.

Authors:  Yunli Fan; Michael K T To; Eric H K Yeung; Jianbin Wu; Rong He; Zhuoman Xu; Ruiwen Zhang; Guangshuo Li; Kenneth M C Cheung; Jason P Y Cheung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Does Curve Regression Occur During Underarm Bracing in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Wing Cheung Yeng; Lawrence Chi Kwan Chan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  An effective assessment method of spinal flexibility to predict the initial in-orthosis correction on the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Chen He; Michael Kai-Tsun To; Jason Pui-Yin Cheung; Kenneth Man-Chee Cheung; Chi-Kwan Chan; Wei-Wei Jiang; Guang-Quan Zhou; Kelly Ka-Lee Lai; Yong-Ping Zheng; Man-Sang Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Results of ultrasound-assisted brace casting for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Doug L Hill; Andreas Donauer; Melissa Tilburn; Douglas Hedden; Marc Moreau; Edmond H Lou
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-08-08

5.  Reliability and Validity Study of Clinical Ultrasound Imaging on Lateral Curvature of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Q Wang; M Li; Edmond H M Lou; M S Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.