Literature DB >> 24859436

Have screening harms become newsworthy? News coverage of prostate and colorectal cancer screening since the 2008 USPSTF recommendation changes.

Emily A Elstad1, Stacey L Sheridan, Joseph G L Lee, Christine Rini, Jo Anne Earp, Noel T Brewer.   

Abstract

In 2008, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated its recommendations to discourage screening for prostate cancer in men over 75 and for colorectal cancer in adults over 85. We aimed to determine whether newspapers portrayed these screenings differently after these recommendation changes. A quantitative content analysis included articles on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing or colonoscopy in US newspapers from 2005 to 2012. Outcomes included the number of benefits and harms mentioned and the gist expert and lay readers might get from articles. Benefits in PSA articles (n = 222) and harms and benefits in colonoscopy articles (n = 65) did not change over time. Mentions of PSA harms increased after 2008 (p < .01). Expected expert gist of PSA articles became more negative after 2008 (p < .01). Expected lay gist was positive and did not change. News coverage of PSA testing harms increased without a decrease in the discussion of benefits. Consumers, especially lay consumers, are receiving unbalanced information on cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859436     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-014-9572-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  35 in total

1.  Print news coverage of cancer: what prevention messages are conveyed when screening is newsworthy?

Authors:  Katherine Clegg Smith; Elizabeth Edsall Kromm; Ann Carroll Klassen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Raquel E Davila; Elizabeth Rajan; Todd H Baron; Douglas G Adler; James V Egan; Douglas O Faigel; Seng-Ian Gan; William K Hirota; Jonathan A Leighton; David Lichtenstein; Waqar A Qureshi; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Trina VanGuilder; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  "The news is [not] all good": misrepresentations and inaccuracies in Australian news media reports on prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Ross MacKenzie; Simon Chapman; Alexandra Barratt; Simon Holding
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Celebrity's death from cancer resulted in increased calls to CancerBACUP.

Authors:  M Boudioni; J Mossman; A L Jones; G Leydon; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-10

6.  The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.

Authors:  Linda B Squiers; Debra J Holden; Suzanne E Dolina; Annice E Kim; Carla M Bann; Jeanette M Renaud
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The newsworthiness of cancer in Australian television news.

Authors:  Ross Mackenzie; Simon Chapman; Natalie Johnson; Kevin McGeechan; Simon Holding
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Anders Klahn; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  4 in total

1. 

Authors:  Guylène Thériault; Pascale Breault; James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Neil R Bell; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Preventive health care and the media.

Authors:  Guylène Thériault; Pascale Breault; James A Dickinson; Roland Grad; Neil R Bell; Harminder Singh; Olga Szafran
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Women's Awareness of and Responses to Messages About Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Results From a 2016 National Survey.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Erika Franklin Fowler; Sarah E Gollust
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  News Coverage of Colorectal Cancer on Google News: Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Grace C Hillyer; Erin T Jacques
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.