| Literature DB >> 24859409 |
Giovanni Conzo1, Pietro Giorgio Calò2, Claudio Gambardella3, Ernesto Tartaglia3, Claudio Mauriello3, Cristina Della Pietra3, Fabio Medas2, Rosa Santa Cruz2, Francesco Podda2, Luigi Santini3, Giancarlo Troncone4.
Abstract
The most appropriate surgical management of "follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm" lesions, is still controversial. Analysing and comparing the experience of two units for endocrine surgery, we retrospectively evaluated 721 patients, surgically treated after a follicular neoplasm diagnosis. Total thyroidectomy was routinely performed in one Institution, while in the other one it was selectively carried out. The main criteria leading to hemythyroidectomy were a single nodule, the age ≤45 years, the absence of thyroiditis or clinical/intraoperative suspicion of malignancy. Total thyroidectomy was performed in 402/721 patients (55.7%), hemythyroidectomy in 319/721 cases (44.2%) and a completion thyroidectomy in 51/319 cases (15.9%). The overall malignancy rate was 24% (176/721 patients), respectively 16% (51/319 patients) following hemythyroidectomy, and 31% (125/402 patients) following total thyroidectomy. Definitive recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and permanent hypoparathyroidism were not reported in hemythyroidectomy patients in which lower mean hospitalization and costs were observed. Considering the low-risk of follicular neoplasm solitary lesions, hemythyroidectomy is still the safest standard of care with lower hospitalization and costs. In case of multiglandular disease or thyroiditis, that might be associated with a higher risk of cancer, total thyroidectomy should be recommended. Further investigation is warranted to achieve a better preoperative follicular neoplasm diagnostic accuracy in order to reduce the amount of unnecessary surgical operations with a diagnostic aim.Entities:
Keywords: Fine needle cytology; Follicular neoplasm; Hemithyroidectomy; Thyroid cancer; Total thyroidectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24859409 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Surg ISSN: 1743-9159 Impact factor: 6.071