BACKGROUND: Concern about an increasing risk of acute pancreatitis associated with incretin-based drugs, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, has emerged recently. OBJECTIVE: This nested case-control study examined the association between the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and acute pancreatitis using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. METHODS: From a study cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, we identified 1,957 acute pancreatitis cases (patients who had been admitted with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis) and 7,828 age-, sex-, and cohort entry year-matched controls between 2000 and 2011. Multivariate conditional regression models were used to estimate the association between the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and acute pancreatitis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the definitions of timing of exposure to DPP-4 inhibitors. RESULTS: The risks of acute pancreatitis among current and past users of DPP-4 inhibitors were comparable with those of non-users (current users: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.04; 95% CI [0.89-1.21]; past users: aOR 1.61 [0.93-2.77]). Similar results were found in sensitivity analyses with various definitions of "current users" of DPP-4 inhibitors. Nevertheless, the adjusted risk of acute pancreatitis was found to be increased significantly in patients with gallstone disease (aOR 5.89 [4.71-7.35]), alcohol-related disease (aOR 5.36 [4.05-7.08]), hypertriglyceridemia (aOR 1.80 [1.26-2.56]), pancreatic disease (aOR 17.29 [10.60-28.19]), and a higher Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI) score (DCSI 3-4: aOR 1.49 [1.21-1.84]; DCSI≥5: aOR 1.32 [1.01-1.73]). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study extends previous evidence by exploring the potential association between DPP-4 inhibitor use and the risk of acute pancreatitis in an ethnic Chinese type 2 diabetic cohort. We found that underlying diseases and severity of diabetes but not DPP-4 inhibitor use were associated with acute pancreatitis.
BACKGROUND: Concern about an increasing risk of acute pancreatitis associated with incretin-based drugs, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, has emerged recently. OBJECTIVE: This nested case-control study examined the association between the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and acute pancreatitis using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. METHODS: From a study cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, we identified 1,957 acute pancreatitis cases (patients who had been admitted with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis) and 7,828 age-, sex-, and cohort entry year-matched controls between 2000 and 2011. Multivariate conditional regression models were used to estimate the association between the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and acute pancreatitis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the definitions of timing of exposure to DPP-4 inhibitors. RESULTS: The risks of acute pancreatitis among current and past users of DPP-4 inhibitors were comparable with those of non-users (current users: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.04; 95% CI [0.89-1.21]; past users: aOR 1.61 [0.93-2.77]). Similar results were found in sensitivity analyses with various definitions of "current users" of DPP-4 inhibitors. Nevertheless, the adjusted risk of acute pancreatitis was found to be increased significantly in patients with gallstone disease (aOR 5.89 [4.71-7.35]), alcohol-related disease (aOR 5.36 [4.05-7.08]), hypertriglyceridemia (aOR 1.80 [1.26-2.56]), pancreatic disease (aOR 17.29 [10.60-28.19]), and a higher Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI) score (DCSI 3-4: aOR 1.49 [1.21-1.84]; DCSI≥5: aOR 1.32 [1.01-1.73]). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study extends previous evidence by exploring the potential association between DPP-4 inhibitor use and the risk of acute pancreatitis in an ethnic Chinese type 2 diabetic cohort. We found that underlying diseases and severity of diabetes but not DPP-4 inhibitor use were associated with acute pancreatitis.
Authors: Sonal Singh; Hsien-Yen Chang; Thomas M Richards; Jonathan P Weiner; Jeanne M Clark; Jodi B Segal Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Bessie Ann Young; Elizabeth Lin; Michael Von Korff; Greg Simon; Paul Ciechanowski; Evette J Ludman; Siobhan Everson-Stewart; Leslie Kinder; Malia Oliver; Edward J Boyko; Wayne J Katon Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Hsien-Yen Chang; Jonathan P Weiner; Thomas M Richards; Sara N Bleich; Jodi B Segal Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Belinda Gier; Aleksey V Matveyenko; David Kirakossian; David Dawson; Sarah M Dry; Peter C Butler Journal: Diabetes Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Hsien-Yen Chang; Jonathan P Weiner; Thomas M Richards; Sara N Bleich; Jodi B Segal Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Debora Williams-Herman; Elizabeth Round; Arlene S Swern; Bret Musser; Michael J Davies; Peter P Stein; Keith D Kaufman; John M Amatruda Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: Martijn J Schuemie; Patrick B Ryan; Kenneth K C Man; Ian C K Wong; Marc A Suchard; George Hripcsak Journal: Stat Med Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.373