Literature DB >> 24859079

The safety of nurse-administered procedural sedation compared to anesthesia care in a historical cohort of advanced endoscopy patients.

Emily S Guimaraes1, Emily J Campbell, James M Richter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In April 2010, in response to a change in Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulation placing deep sedation under hospital anesthesia services, our institution began providing anesthesia care for all advanced endoscopic procedures. Because it remains unknown whether anesthesia care reduces sedation-related complications or improves quality of care versus nurse-administered sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound patients, we retrospectively compared complications in a 5-year historical cohort before and after the policy change.
METHODS: We reviewed a historical cohort of 9598 consecutive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound examinations for adult patients at a single institution during a 5-year period (October 2007-October 2012). We compared procedures performed before and after the policy change for the incidence of sedation, endoscopic, and total complications, and for major morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS: The incidence of reported sedation-related complications was 0.38% (17 of 4514) before the policy change and 0.08% (4 of 5084) after the policy change, which was statistically significant (P = 0.002, diff = 0.3, 95% confidence interval, 0.11%-0.53%). Endoscopic complications were not significantly different before versus after: 0.66% vs 0.87% (P = 0.293, diff = 0.2, 95% confidence interval, -0.16% to 0.56%). Total complications (1.11% vs 1.00%, P = 0.618) and major morbidity and mortality (0.27% vs 0.33%, P = 0.581) did not differ between the 2 time periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia care for advanced endoscopy in a high-risk population significantly reduced sedation complications compared with nurse-administered sedation. Endoscopic complications were unchanged. The sedation risk reduction did not reduce major morbidity, mortality, or total complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859079     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Registered nurse-administered sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedure.

Authors:  Somchai Amornyotin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

2.  Anesthesia Service Use During Outpatient Gastroenterology Procedures Continued to Increase From 2010 to 2013 and Potentially Discretionary Spending Remained High.

Authors:  Zachary Predmore; Xiaoyu Nie; Regan Main; Soeren Mattke; Hangsheng Liu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Patient safety during procedural sedation using capnography monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Saunders; Michel M R F Struys; Richard F Pollock; Michael Mestek; Jenifer R Lightdale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Intranasal sufentanil combined with intranasal dexmedetomidine: A promising method for non-anesthesiologist sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Zhi-Jun Ge; Chao Han
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.534

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.