Yukio Takeshita1, Birgit Obermeier1, Anne Cotleur1, Yasuteru Sano2, Takashi Kanda2, Richard M Ransohoff3. 1. Neuroinflammation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States. 2. Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan. 3. Neuroinflammation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States. Electronic address: ransohr@ccf.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) models can be useful for understanding leukocyte-endothelial interactions at this unique vascular-tissue interface. Desirable features of such a model include shear stress, non-transformed cells and co-cultures of brain microvascular endothelial cells with astrocytes. Recovery of transmigrated leukocytes for further analysis is also appealing. NEW METHODS: We report an in vitro BBB model for leukocyte transmigration incorporating shear stress with co-culture of conditionally immortalized human endothelial cell line (hBMVEC) and human astrocyte cell line (hAST). Transmigrated leukocytes can be recovered for comparison with input and non-transmigrated cells. RESULT: hBMVEC and hAST exhibited physiological and morphological BBB properties when cocultured back-to-back on membranes. In particular, astrocyte processes protruded through 3 μm membrane pores, terminating in close proximity to the hBMVEC with a morphology reminiscent of end-feet. Co-culture with hAST also decreased the permeability of hBMVEC. In our model, astrocytes promoted transendothelial leukocyte transmigration. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: This model offers the opportunity to evaluate whether BBB properties and leukocyte transmigration across cytokine-activated hBMVEC are influenced by human astrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: We present a BBB model for leukocyte transmigration incorporating shear stress with co-culture of hBMVEC and hAST. We demonstrate that hAST promoted leukocyte transmigration and also increased certain barrier functions of hBMVEC. This model provides reproducible assays for leukocyte transmigration with robust results, which will enable further defining the relationships among leukocytes and the cellular elements of the BBB.
BACKGROUND: In vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) models can be useful for understanding leukocyte-endothelial interactions at this unique vascular-tissue interface. Desirable features of such a model include shear stress, non-transformed cells and co-cultures of brain microvascular endothelial cells with astrocytes. Recovery of transmigrated leukocytes for further analysis is also appealing. NEW METHODS: We report an in vitro BBB model for leukocyte transmigration incorporating shear stress with co-culture of conditionally immortalized human endothelial cell line (hBMVEC) and human astrocyte cell line (hAST). Transmigrated leukocytes can be recovered for comparison with input and non-transmigrated cells. RESULT: hBMVEC and hAST exhibited physiological and morphological BBB properties when cocultured back-to-back on membranes. In particular, astrocyte processes protruded through 3 μm membrane pores, terminating in close proximity to the hBMVEC with a morphology reminiscent of end-feet. Co-culture with hAST also decreased the permeability of hBMVEC. In our model, astrocytes promoted transendothelial leukocyte transmigration. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: This model offers the opportunity to evaluate whether BBB properties and leukocyte transmigration across cytokine-activated hBMVEC are influenced by human astrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: We present a BBB model for leukocyte transmigration incorporating shear stress with co-culture of hBMVEC and hAST. We demonstrate that hAST promoted leukocyte transmigration and also increased certain barrier functions of hBMVEC. This model provides reproducible assays for leukocyte transmigration with robust results, which will enable further defining the relationships among leukocytes and the cellular elements of the BBB.
Authors: Y Igarashi; H Utsumi; H Chiba; Y Yamada-Sasamori; H Tobioka; Y Kamimura; K Furuuchi; Y Kokai; T Nakagawa; M Mori; N Sawada Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1999-07-22 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Don Mahad; Melissa K Callahan; Katherine A Williams; Eroboghene E Ubogu; Pia Kivisäkk; Barbara Tucky; Grahame Kidd; Gillian A Kingsbury; Ansi Chang; Robert J Fox; Matthias Mack; M Bradley Sniderman; Rivka Ravid; Susan M Staugaitis; Monique F Stins; Richard M Ransohoff Journal: Brain Date: 2005-10-17 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: R M Ransohoff; T A Hamilton; M Tani; M H Stoler; H E Shick; J A Major; M L Estes; D M Thomas; V K Tuohy Journal: FASEB J Date: 1993-04-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis Journal: Biomicrofluidics Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 2.800
Authors: Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Urvashi Bhatia; Tilman Schneider-Hohendorf; Nicholas Schwab; Heinz Wiendl; Catharina C Gross Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: C Ryan Oliver; Megan A Altemus; Trisha M Westerhof; Hannah Cheriyan; Xu Cheng; Michelle Dziubinski; Zhifen Wu; Joel Yates; Aki Morikawa; Jason Heth; Maria G Castro; Brendan M Leung; Shuichi Takayama; Sofia D Merajver Journal: Lab Chip Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 6.799
Authors: Jacquelyn A Brown; Virginia Pensabene; Dmitry A Markov; Vanessa Allwardt; M Diana Neely; Mingjian Shi; Clayton M Britt; Orlando S Hoilett; Qing Yang; Bryson M Brewer; Philip C Samson; Lisa J McCawley; James M May; Donna J Webb; Deyu Li; Aaron B Bowman; Ronald S Reiserer; John P Wikswo Journal: Biomicrofluidics Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 2.800