BACKGROUND: The technical complexity of pancreatic resection has made it a specialized procedure performed in high-volume centers. It has been shown that patients operated on in high-volume pancreatobiliary centers have fewer complications and better survival. The purpose of this study was to share our experience with and report long-term outcomes of pancreaticoduodenal resections performed in a low-volume center in Pakistan. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenal resection for adenocarcinoma at our institute from 1999 to 2012 were reviewed. A total of 39 patients were included in the study. Variables included patients' clinical and histopathological characteristics. Outcome was determined based on complication rate, 30- and 90-day mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival. For survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves were used and significance was determined using a log rank test. Univariate Cox analysis was performed to determine significant factors for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The majority of tumors [20 (51 %)] were moderate grade, T1/T2 [20 (51 %)], ampullary adenocarcinomas [18 (46 %)]. Mean hospital stay was 14 ± 8 days. The mean number of nodes removed was 13.9 ± 6.9, while mean number of positive nodes was 1 ± 1.7. Expected 5-year overall survival and relapse-free survival were 38 and 48 %, respectively. Overall 5-year survival was significantly different with respect to nodal involvement, i.e., 47 vs. 28 % (P = 0.018). On univariate analysis, nodal involvement was the only factor associated with an increased risk of death (P = 0.02, hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.8). CONCLUSION: Low-volume centers are an acceptable alternate to high-volume centers for performing pancreaticoduodenal resection in carefully selected patients. Efforts should be directed at developing specialized hepatobiliary centers in developing countries.
BACKGROUND: The technical complexity of pancreatic resection has made it a specialized procedure performed in high-volume centers. It has been shown that patients operated on in high-volume pancreatobiliary centers have fewer complications and better survival. The purpose of this study was to share our experience with and report long-term outcomes of pancreaticoduodenal resections performed in a low-volume center in Pakistan. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenal resection for adenocarcinoma at our institute from 1999 to 2012 were reviewed. A total of 39 patients were included in the study. Variables included patients' clinical and histopathological characteristics. Outcome was determined based on complication rate, 30- and 90-day mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival. For survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves were used and significance was determined using a log rank test. Univariate Cox analysis was performed to determine significant factors for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The majority of tumors [20 (51 %)] were moderate grade, T1/T2 [20 (51 %)], ampullary adenocarcinomas [18 (46 %)]. Mean hospital stay was 14 ± 8 days. The mean number of nodes removed was 13.9 ± 6.9, while mean number of positive nodes was 1 ± 1.7. Expected 5-year overall survival and relapse-free survival were 38 and 48 %, respectively. Overall 5-year survival was significantly different with respect to nodal involvement, i.e., 47 vs. 28 % (P = 0.018). On univariate analysis, nodal involvement was the only factor associated with an increased risk of death (P = 0.02, hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.8). CONCLUSION: Low-volume centers are an acceptable alternate to high-volume centers for performing pancreaticoduodenal resection in carefully selected patients. Efforts should be directed at developing specialized hepatobiliary centers in developing countries.
Authors: N Tjarda van Heek; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Rob J Scholten; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Axel Richter; Marco Niedergethmann; Jörg W Sturm; Dietmar Lorenz; Stefan Post; Michael Trede Journal: World J Surg Date: 2003-02-27 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: David K Chang; Amber L Johns; Neil D Merrett; Anthony J Gill; Emily K Colvin; Christopher J Scarlett; Nam Q Nguyen; Rupert W L Leong; Peter H Cosman; Mark I Kelly; Robert L Sutherland; Susan M Henshall; James G Kench; Andrew V Biankin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-27 Impact factor: 44.544