| Literature DB >> 24857963 |
Fang-Yu Chang1, Fang-Jung Hsu2, Chi-Jen Tai3, Wen-Chi Wei4, Ning-Sun Yang5, Jyh-Horng Sheu6.
Abstract
Five new eunicellin-based diterpenoids, klymollins T-X (1-5), along with two known compounds (6 and 7) have been isolated from the soft coral Klyxum molle. The structures of these new metabolites were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic analysis and by comparison with related known compounds. Compound 5 was found to exert significant in vitro anti-inflammatory activity against LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Furthermore, compounds 4 and 7 were shown to exhibit cytotoxicity against a limited panel of human cancer cell lines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24857963 PMCID: PMC4052331 DOI: 10.3390/md12053060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Chart 1Structures of metabolites 1–7.
13C and 1H NMR data for compounds 1–3.
| 1 a | 2 b | 3 b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH | δC | δH | δC | δH | δC | |
| 1 | 2.33 m | 42.4 (CH) c | 2.38 t (7.2) d | 41.8 (CH) | 2.20 m | 46.0 (CH) |
| 2 | 3.97 brs e | 91.6 (CH) | 3.79 brs | 90.8 (CH) | 3.58 brs | 90.9 (CH) |
| 3 | 84.9 (C) | 84.6 (C) | 86.7 (C) | |||
| 4 | 1.49 m | 28.5 (CH2) | 1.53 m | 27.8 (CH2) | 2.10 m | 37.6 (CH2) |
| 5 | 1.62 m | 34.4 (CH2) | 1.69 m | 34.3 (CH2) | 2.76 m | 32.8 (CH2) |
| 6 | 4.24 dd (9.5, 4.0) d | 73.0 (CH) | 4.29 d (8.0) | 72.5 (CH) | 113.4 (C) | |
| 7 | 150.5 (C) | 150.0 (C) | 2.16 m | 38.8 (CH) | ||
| 8 | 2.57 d (13.5) | 41.4 (CH2) | 2.48 d (13.6) | 40.7 (CH2) | 2.41 ddd (16.0, 6.8, 3.2) | 36.0 (CH2) |
| 9 | 5.00 d (5.5) | 80.6 (CH) | 4.90 m | 80.1 (CH) | 4.05 dt (8.8, 3.2) | 82.1 (CH) |
| 10 | 2.17 t (8.5) | 43.5 (CH) | 2.26 t (10.4) | 42.9 (CH) | 3.92 t (8.0) | 46.6 (CH) |
| 11 | 55.7 (C) | 55.2 (C) | 148.1 (C) | |||
| 12 | 5.24 d (2.0) | 74.2 (CH) | 4.92 brs | 73.6 (CH) | 2.02 m | 31.2 (CH2) |
| 13 | 5.11 dd (11.0, 2.0) | 72.9 (CH) | 4.91 d (10.4) | 72.2 (CH) | 0.99 m1.70 m | 24.9 (CH2) |
| 14 | 2.11 m | 41.8 (CH) | 2.01 m | 40.7 (CH) | 1.26 m | 43.2 (CH) |
| 15 | 1.75 s | 22.9 (CH3) | 1.65 s | 22.1 (CH3) | 1.31 s | 23.2 (CH3) |
| 16 | 5.24 d (2.0) | 116.9 (CH2) | 4.98 brs | 116.8 (CH2) | 1.36 d (7.6) | 19.1 (CH3) |
| 17 | 1.99 d (5.0) | 53.0 (CH2) | 2.64 d (4.8) | 53.6 (CH2) | 4.77 brs | 109.8 (CH2) |
| 18 | 2.06 m | 28.3 (CH) | 2.03 m | 27.3 (CH) | 1.70 m | 29.1 (CH) |
| 19 | 0.89 d (7.0) | 16.3 (CH3) | 0.84 d (7.2) | 15.3 (CH3) | 0.95 d (6.8) | 21.9 (CH3) |
| 20 | 1.12 d (7.0) | 24.5 (CH3) | 1.09 d (7.2) | 24.0 (CH3) | 0.76 d (6.8) | 15.4 (CH3) |
| 3-OAc | 170.1 (C) | 169.4 (C) | ||||
| 6-OMe | 3.26 brs | 48.5 (CH3) | ||||
| 12-OAc | 170.1 (C) | |||||
| 12-OCOPr | 172.6 (C) | |||||
| 13-OAc | 170.0 (C) | |||||
| 13-OCOPr | 172.0 (C) | |||||
a 13C and 1H spectra recorded at 125 and 500 MHz in C6D6; b 13C and 1H spectra recorded at 100 and 400 MHz in CDCl3; c Deduced from DEPT; d J values (Hz) in parentheses; e Broad signal.
Figure 1Selected COSY (▬) and HMBC (→) correlations of 1, 3 and 4.
Figure 2Key NOESY Correlations for 1.
Figure 3Key NOESY Correlations for 3 and 4.
13C and 1H NMR data for compounds 4 and 5.
| 4 | 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH | δC | δH | δC | |
| 1 | 2.18 m | 45.7 (CH) a | 2.19 m | 45.9 (CH) |
| 2 | 3.63 brs b | 92.1 (CH) | 3.59 brs | 92.3 (CH) |
| 3 | 86.7 (C) | 86.4 (C) | ||
| 4 | 2.04 m | 35.7 (CH2) | 1.94 m | 35.6 (CH2) |
| 5 | 1.26 m | 29.2 (CH2) | 1.37 m | 27.4 (CH2) |
| 6 | 5.63 d (6.0) | 84.7 (CH) | 5.22 d (6.0) | 83.4 (CH) |
| 7 | 75.6 (C) | 72.9 (C) | ||
| 8 | 1.86 m | 45.9 (CH2) | 1.81 dd (14.0, 3.6) | 45.2 (CH2) |
| 9 | 4.17 q (7.2) | 78.1 (CH) | 3.85 ddd (3.6, 7.6, 11.2) | 78.6 (CH) |
| 10 | 2.98 t (7.2) | 53.8 (CH) | 3.06 t (7.6) | 53.8 (CH) |
| 11 | 147.6 (C) | 147.4 (C) | ||
| 12 | 2.04 m | 31.5 (CH2) | 2.05 m | 31.6 (CH2) |
| 13 | 1.02 m | 24.6 (CH2) | 1.02 m | 24.6 (CH2) |
| 14 | 1.29 m | 43.9 (CH) | 1.23 m | 43.9 (CH) |
| 15 | 1.39 s | 22.9 (CH3) | 1.38 s | 23.1 (CH3) |
| 16 | 1.20 s | 23.7 (CH3) | 1.27 s | 25.4 (CH3) |
| 17 | 4.62 brs | 109.5 (CH2) | 4.64 brs | 109.9 (CH2) |
| 18 | 1.72 m | 29.0 (CH) | 1.74 m | 29.0 (CH) |
| 19 | 0.97 d (7.2) | 21.9 (CH3) | 0.98 d (7.2) | 21.9 (CH3) |
| 20 | 0.79 d (7.2) | 15.4 (CH3) | 0.79 d (7.2) | 15.4 (CH3) |
| 3-OAc | 169.6 (C) | 169.6 (C) | ||
| 6-OAc | 171.9 (C) | 170.1 (C) | ||
13C and 1H spectra recorded at 100 and 400 MHz in CDCl3; a Deduced from DEPT; b Broad signal; c J values (Hz) in parentheses.
Figure 4Effect of compounds 1–7 on LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-α expression in RAW264.7 macrophage cells by ELISA analysis. The values are mean ± SEM. (n = 6). Relative intensity of the LPS alone stimulated group was taken as 100%. * Significantly different from LPS alone stimulated group (P < 0.05). a stimulated with LPS, b stimulated with LPS in the presence of 1–7 (25 μM).