| Literature DB >> 24857963 |
Fang-Yu Chang1, Fang-Jung Hsu2, Chi-Jen Tai3, Wen-Chi Wei4, Ning-Sun Yang5, Jyh-Horng Sheu6.
Abstract
Five new eunicellin-based diterpenoids,Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24857963 PMCID: PMC4052331 DOI: 10.3390/md12053060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Chart 1Structures of metabolites 1–7.
13C and 1H NMR data for compounds 1–3.
| 1 a | 2 b | 3 b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH | δC | δH | δC | δH | δC | |
| 1 | 2.33 m | 42.4 (CH) c | 2.38 t (7.2) d | 41.8 (CH) | 2.20 m | 46.0 (CH) |
| 2 | 3.97 brs e | 91.6 (CH) | 3.79 brs | 90.8 (CH) | 3.58 brs | 90.9 (CH) |
| 3 | 84.9 (C) | 84.6 (C) | 86.7 (C) | |||
| 4 | 1.49 m | 28.5 (CH2) | 1.53 m | 27.8 (CH2) | 2.10 m | 37.6 (CH2) |
| 5 | 1.62 m | 34.4 (CH2) | 1.69 m | 34.3 (CH2) | 2.76 m | 32.8 (CH2) |
| 6 | 4.24 dd (9.5, 4.0) d | 73.0 (CH) | 4.29 d (8.0) | 72.5 (CH) | 113.4 (C) | |
| 7 | 150.5 (C) | 150.0 (C) | 2.16 m | 38.8 (CH) | ||
| 8 | 2.57 d (13.5) | 41.4 (CH2) | 2.48 d (13.6) | 40.7 (CH2) | 2.41 ddd (16.0, 6.8, 3.2) | 36.0 (CH2) |
| 9 | 5.00 d (5.5) | 80.6 (CH) | 4.90 m | 80.1 (CH) | 4.05 dt (8.8, 3.2) | 82.1 (CH) |
| 10 | 2.17 t (8.5) | 43.5 (CH) | 2.26 t (10.4) | 42.9 (CH) | 3.92 t (8.0) | 46.6 (CH) |
| 11 | 55.7 (C) | 55.2 (C) | 148.1 (C) | |||
| 12 | 5.24 d (2.0) | 74.2 (CH) | 4.92 brs | 73.6 (CH) | 2.02 m | 31.2 (CH2) |
| 13 | 5.11 dd (11.0, 2.0) | 72.9 (CH) | 4.91 d (10.4) | 72.2 (CH) | 0.99 m1.70 m | 24.9 (CH2) |
| 14 | 2.11 m | 41.8 (CH) | 2.01 m | 40.7 (CH) | 1.26 m | 43.2 (CH) |
| 15 | 1.75 s | 22.9 (CH3) | 1.65 s | 22.1 (CH3) | 1.31 s | 23.2 (CH3) |
| 16 | 5.24 d (2.0) | 116.9 (CH2) | 4.98 brs | 116.8 (CH2) | 1.36 d (7.6) | 19.1 (CH3) |
| 17 | 1.99 d (5.0) | 53.0 (CH2) | 2.64 d (4.8) | 53.6 (CH2) | 4.77 brs | 109.8 (CH2) |
| 18 | 2.06 m | 28.3 (CH) | 2.03 m | 27.3 (CH) | 1.70 m | 29.1 (CH) |
| 19 | 0.89 d (7.0) | 16.3 (CH3) | 0.84 d (7.2) | 15.3 (CH3) | 0.95 d (6.8) | 21.9 (CH3) |
| 20 | 1.12 d (7.0) | 24.5 (CH3) | 1.09 d (7.2) | 24.0 (CH3) | 0.76 d (6.8) | 15.4 (CH3) |
| 3-OAc | 170.1 (C) | 169.4 (C) | ||||
| 6-OMe | 3.26 brs | 48.5 (CH3) | ||||
| 12-OAc | 170.1 (C) | |||||
| 12-OCOPr | 172.6 (C) | |||||
| 13-OAc | 170.0 (C) | |||||
| 13-OCOPr | 172.0 (C) | |||||
a 13C and 1H spectra recorded at 125 and 500 MHz in C6D6; b 13C and 1H spectra recorded at 100 and 400 MHz in CDCl3; c Deduced from DEPT; d J values (Hz) in parentheses; e Broad signal.
Figure 1Selected COSY (▬) and HMBC (→) correlations of 1, 3 and 4.
Figure 2Key NOESY Correlations for 1.
Figure 3Key NOESY Correlations for 3 and 4.
13C and 1H NMR data for compounds 4 and 5.
| 4 | 5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH | δC | δH | δC | |
| 1 | 2.18 m | 45.7 (CH) a | 2.19 m | 45.9 (CH) |
| 2 | 3.63 brs b | 92.1 (CH) | 3.59 brs | 92.3 (CH) |
| 3 | 86.7 (C) | 86.4 (C) | ||
| 4 | 2.04 m | 35.7 (CH2) | 1.94 m | 35.6 (CH2) |
| 5 | 1.26 m | 29.2 (CH2) | 1.37 m | 27.4 (CH2) |
| 6 | 5.63 d (6.0) | 84.7 (CH) | 5.22 d (6.0) | 83.4 (CH) |
| 7 | 75.6 (C) | 72.9 (C) | ||
| 8 | 1.86 m | 45.9 (CH2) | 1.81 dd (14.0, 3.6) | 45.2 (CH2) |
| 9 | 4.17 q (7.2) | 78.1 (CH) | 3.85 ddd (3.6, 7.6, 11.2) | 78.6 (CH) |
| 10 | 2.98 t (7.2) | 53.8 (CH) | 3.06 t (7.6) | 53.8 (CH) |
| 11 | 147.6 (C) | 147.4 (C) | ||
| 12 | 2.04 m | 31.5 (CH2) | 2.05 m | 31.6 (CH2) |
| 13 | 1.02 m | 24.6 (CH2) | 1.02 m | 24.6 (CH2) |
| 14 | 1.29 m | 43.9 (CH) | 1.23 m | 43.9 (CH) |
| 15 | 1.39 s | 22.9 (CH3) | 1.38 s | 23.1 (CH3) |
| 16 | 1.20 s | 23.7 (CH3) | 1.27 s | 25.4 (CH3) |
| 17 | 4.62 brs | 109.5 (CH2) | 4.64 brs | 109.9 (CH2) |
| 18 | 1.72 m | 29.0 (CH) | 1.74 m | 29.0 (CH) |
| 19 | 0.97 d (7.2) | 21.9 (CH3) | 0.98 d (7.2) | 21.9 (CH3) |
| 20 | 0.79 d (7.2) | 15.4 (CH3) | 0.79 d (7.2) | 15.4 (CH3) |
| 3-OAc | 169.6 (C) | 169.6 (C) | ||
| 6-OAc | 171.9 (C) | 170.1 (C) | ||
13C and 1H spectra recorded at 100 and 400 MHz in CDCl3; a Deduced from DEPT; b Broad signal; c J values (Hz) in parentheses.
Figure 4Effect of compounds 1–7 on LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-α expression in RAW264.7 macrophage cells by ELISA analysis. The values are mean ± SEM. (n = 6). Relative intensity of the LPS alone stimulated group was taken as 100%. * Significantly different from LPS alone stimulated group (P < 0.05). a stimulated with LPS, b stimulated with LPS in the presence of 1–7 (25 μM).