Literature DB >> 24857202

A second duodenal biopsy is necessary in the follow-up of adult coeliac patients.

Federico Biagi1, Claudia Vattiato, Simona Agazzi, Davide Balduzzi, Annalisa Schiepatti, Paolo Gobbi, Gino Roberto Corazza.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Coeliac disease is a chronic enteropathy requiring a close follow-up. However, the best way to follow up coeliac patients has not yet been established. In the last 14 years, we have been offering patients a thorough series of periodical examinations including a histological re-evaluation at 12-18 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The notes of all coeliac patients attending our clinic between September 1999 and March 2013 were examined.
RESULTS: Data from 317 adult patients were collected. Duodenal biopsy showed a lack of satisfactory histological response in 25/317 patients; endomysial antibodies were still positive in 76, and diet adherence and clinical response were unsatisfactory in 58 and 97, respectively. Correlations of serological data, clinical response, and diet adherence with histological findings were evaluated. Although the P values showed statistically significant differences, sensitivity and specificity were disappointing: 64% and 80% for serological response, 48% and 71% for clinical response, 56% and 85% for diet adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: After 12-18 months on a gluten-free diet, 8% of the patients do not present a satisfactory histological response; only some of them could have been identified with a serological and/or clinical re-evaluation. Therefore, a duodenal biopsy seems to be the only tool that could identify patients with unsatisfactory histological response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Celiac disease; complications; endomysial antibodies; follow-up; gluten-free diet

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24857202     DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2014.913378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  4 in total

1.  A Call for Research on the Prognostic Role of Follow-Up Histology in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zsolt Szakács; Noémi Gede; Zoltán Gyöngyi; Margit Solymár; Dezső Csupor; Bálint Erőss; Áron Vincze; Alexandra Mikó; Andrea Vasas; László Szapáry; Dalma Dobszai; Viktória Balikó; Roland Hágendorn; Péter Hegyi; Judit Bajor
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Gluten and FODMAPS-Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?

Authors:  Walburga Dieterich; Yurdagül Zopf
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 3.  Narrative Review: Nutrient Deficiencies in Adults and Children with Treated and Untreated Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Johanna M Kreutz; Marlou P M Adriaanse; Elisabeth M C van der Ploeg; Anita C E Vreugdenhil
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  The Spectrum of Differences between Childhood and Adulthood Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Rachele Ciccocioppo; Peter Kruzliak; Giuseppina C Cangemi; Miroslav Pohanka; Elena Betti; Eugenia Lauret; Luis Rodrigo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.