Literature DB >> 24856782

Evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of HNVAC, an MDCK-based H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine, in Phase I single centre and Phase II/III multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel assignment studies.

V H Basavaraj1, G Sampath2, Nagendra R Hegde3, V Krishna Mohan4, Krishna M Ella4.   

Abstract

The clinical evaluation of the MDCK-based H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine HNVAC in adults aged 18-65 years is reported. In the Phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre study, 160 subjects were parallelly assigned 3:1 to vaccine:placebo groups (n=60:20) with both the aluminium hydroxide adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccine formulations. A single dose of both the formulations containing 15 μg of haemagglutinin protein showed minimal adverse reactions, the most common of which were pain at injection site (11.67%) and fever (10.00%). Both formulations produced 74-81% seroprotection (SRP: titre of ≥40), 67-70% seroconversion (SRC: four-fold increase in titres between days 0 and 21), and a four-fold increase in geometric mean titres (GMT). Aluminium hydroxide did not have a significant effect either on immunogenicity or on reactogenicity. Nevertheless, based on its recognized positive effects on the stability and immunogenicity of many vaccines, and its marginal benefit in both pre-clinical and Phase I studies of HNVAC, alum adjuvanted HNVAC was further tested in a staggered Phase II/III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre study of 200 and 195 subjects, respectively, parallelly assigned 4:1 to adjuvanted vaccine and placebo groups. In these studies, the most common adverse reactions were pain at injection site (6.88% and 5.77% in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively) and fever (7.50% and 7.05%, respectively), and a single dose resulted in 87-90% SRP, 85-86% SRC, and a nearly six-fold increase in GMT, meeting or exceeding licensing criteria. It is concluded that HNVAC is safe and immunogenic to adults of 18-65 years.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell culture; Clinical trial; H1N1; Influenza; Pandemic; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24856782     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cell culture-based influenza vaccines: A necessary and indispensable investment for the future.

Authors:  Nagendra R Hegde
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Aluminium adjuvants versus placebo or no intervention in vaccine randomised clinical trials: a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Russo Krauss; Marija Barbateskovic; Sarah Louise Klingenberg; Snezana Djurisic; Sesilje Bondo Petersen; Mette Kenfelt; De Zhao Kong; Janus C Jakobsen; Christian Gluud
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Influenza vaccination: Some clinical concerns for South Asian practitioner.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Immunogenicity of H5N1 influenza vaccines in elderly adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Xiaoxue Wu; Yu Shi; Xiaoqin Gou; Junqiong Huang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.