Literature DB >> 24856765

Increased incidence of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic compared with open biceps tenodesis.

Brian C Werner1, Hakan C Pehlivan1, Joseph M Hart1, Eric W Carson1, David R Diduch1, Mark D Miller1, Stephen F Brockmeier2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of postoperative stiffness after open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, compare the incidence between each method, and determine relevant risk factors for its occurrence.
METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who underwent biceps tenodesis during a 3-year period were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: We evaluated 249 patients, which included 143 who underwent open subpectoral tenodesis and 106 who underwent arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis. The mean overall follow-up period for the arthroscopic group was 9.9 months (range, 5.1 to 33.5 months). The mean overall follow-up period for the open group was 9.5 months (range, 4.7 to 49.2 months). There was no significant difference in overall follow-up duration between groups (P = .627). A significantly increased incidence of postoperative stiffness was found in the arthroscopic group compared with the open group (17.9% v 5.6%, P = .002). Within the arthroscopic group, patients with postoperative stiffness were more frequently female patients than those without stiffness (63.2% v 33.3%, P = .016) and were more likely to be smokers than those without stiffness (36.8% v 16.1%, P = .040). The tenodesis site was located significantly more proximal in the arthroscopic group of patients with postoperative stiffness compared with patients without postoperative stiffness (32.44 ± 7.8 mm from the top of the humeral head v 50.34 ± 7.8 mm, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a notably increased incidence of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis compared with open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. This appears to occur more commonly in female patients and smokers and may have a relation to the position of the tenodesis, with a more superiorly placed tenodesis site being a potential influencing factor. On the basis of this series, this complication most commonly will improve over time and with symptom-based management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic case-control study.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24856765     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  The influence of suprapectoral arthroscopic biceps tenodesis for isolated biceps lesions on elbow flexion force and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Martin Hufeland; Carina Kolem; Christoph Ziskoven; Jörn Kircher; Rüdiger Krauspe; Thilo Patzer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Outcomes following long head of biceps tendon tenodesis.

Authors:  Saad M AlQahtani; Ryan T Bicknell
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  The rate and reporting of fracture after biceps tenodesis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hailey P Huddleston; Joey S Kurtzman; Samuel Gedailovich; Steven M Koehler; William R Aibinder
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-24

4.  Open Versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; David E DeMik; Bastian Uribe; Brian R Wolf; Matthew Bollier
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

5.  Tenoscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis.

Authors:  Dirk Maier; Kaywan Izadpanah; Martin Jaeger; Peter Ogon; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-01-18

Review 6.  [Injuries of the biceps-labrum complex : Principles, pathologies and treatment concepts].

Authors:  N Hawi; P Habermeyer; R Meller; S Razaeian; C von Falck; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Patient Satisfaction After Biceps Tenotomy.

Authors:  Brett D Meeks; Natalie M Meeks; Andrew W Froehle; Emily Wareing; Kevin F Bonner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-25

8.  Trends in Open and Arthroscopic Long Head of Biceps Tenodesis.

Authors:  Bryan M Saltzman; Timothy S Leroux; Eric J Cotter; Bryce Basques; Justin Griffin; Rachel M Frank; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-01-03

9.  Mini-open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Christopher Arena; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-09-18

10.  Increased reoperation rates among patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy with concomitant biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Michelle Xiao; Geoffrey D Abrams
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.