Ruth Taylor1, Colin Macduff2, Audrey Stephen3. 1. Anglia Ruskin University, Faculty of Health Social Care and Education, Chelmsford Campus, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM 1SQ. Electronic address: ruth.taylor@anglia.ac.uk. 2. Robert Gordon University. Electronic address: c.macduff@rgu.ac.uk. 3. Robert Gordon University. Electronic address: a.i.stephen@rgu.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This paper presents the main findings from a project that aimed to evaluate selection processes for the recruitment of student nurses and midwives. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives were to: Design The evaluation was designed principally to achieve explanation, with multiple case study methodology adopted as the main approach. Within this ambit mixed methods of data collection involving questionnaires and interviews were used. Participants Seven of the Scotland-based Higher Education Institutions participated in the research, with participation from Admissions Tutors, clinical interviewers, academic interviewers, and students. METHODS: The methods included: a scoping questionnaire with follow-on questionnaire to elicit views on the strengths and limitations of chosen selection processes; interviews and focus groups to build on these findings. Analytical approaches were congruent with the chosen data collection approaches. Findings HEIs typically have rationales for their various chosen approaches to selection. However, our findings indicate that there is a lack of evidence for most selection approaches particularly in relation to interviewing. There is a growing evidence-base for the use of multiple mini interviews, and emotional intelligence testing. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to work collectively cross-UK to bring together the evidence-base around selection so that processes and decision-making are as valid, reliable, effective and transparent as possible. Crown
BACKGROUND: This paper presents the main findings from a project that aimed to evaluate selection processes for the recruitment of student nurses and midwives. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives were to: Design The evaluation was designed principally to achieve explanation, with multiple case study methodology adopted as the main approach. Within this ambit mixed methods of data collection involving questionnaires and interviews were used. Participants Seven of the Scotland-based Higher Education Institutions participated in the research, with participation from Admissions Tutors, clinical interviewers, academic interviewers, and students. METHODS: The methods included: a scoping questionnaire with follow-on questionnaire to elicit views on the strengths and limitations of chosen selection processes; interviews and focus groups to build on these findings. Analytical approaches were congruent with the chosen data collection approaches. Findings HEIs typically have rationales for their various chosen approaches to selection. However, our findings indicate that there is a lack of evidence for most selection approaches particularly in relation to interviewing. There is a growing evidence-base for the use of multiple mini interviews, and emotional intelligence testing. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to work collectively cross-UK to bring together the evidence-base around selection so that processes and decision-making are as valid, reliable, effective and transparent as possible. Crown
Keywords:
Attributes for nursing and midwifery; Compassion; Emotional intelligence; Interviewing; Multiple mini interviews; Nursing and midwifery education; Selection of students