Somjot S Brar1, Vicken Aharonian2, Prakash Mansukhani2, Naing Moore2, Albert Y-J Shen3, Michael Jorgensen3, Aman Dua3, Lindsay Short2, Kevin Kane2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Regional Cardiac Cath Lab, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Research and Evaluations, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, CA, USA. Electronic address: sbrar@cvri.org. 2. Regional Cardiac Cath Lab, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The administration of intravenous fluid remains the cornerstone treatment for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. However, no well-defined protocols exist to guide fluid administration in this treatment. We aimed to establish the efficacy of a new fluid protocol to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury. METHODS: In this randomised, parallel-group, comparator-controlled, single-blind phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy of a new fluid protocol based on the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, which was defined as a greater than 25% or greater than 0·5 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine concentration. Between Oct 10, 2010, and July 17, 2012, 396 patients aged 18 years or older undergoing cardiac catheterisation with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) or less and one or more of several risk factors (diabetes mellitus, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, or ageolder than 75 years) were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided volume expansion (n=196) or the control group (n=200) who received a standard fluid administration protocol. Four computer-generated concealed randomisation schedules, each with permuted block sizes of 4, were used for randomisation, and participants were allocated to the next sequential randomisation number by sealed opaque envelopes. Patients and laboratory personnel were masked to treatment assignment, but the physicians who did the procedures were not masked. Both groups received intravenous 0·9% sodium chloride at 3 mL/kg for 1 h before cardiac catheterisation. Analyses were by intention to treat. Adverse events were assessed at 30 days and 6 months and all such events were classified by staff who were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01218828. FINDINGS:Contrast-induced acute kidney injury occurred less frequently in patients in the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided group (6·7% [12/178]) than in the control group (16·3% [28/172]; relative risk 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·79; p=0·005). Hydration treatment was terminated prematurely because of shortness of breath in three patients in each group. INTERPRETATION: Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided fluid administration seems to be safe and effective in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. FUNDING: Kaiser Permanente Southern California regional research committee grant.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The administration of intravenous fluid remains the cornerstone treatment for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. However, no well-defined protocols exist to guide fluid administration in this treatment. We aimed to establish the efficacy of a new fluid protocol to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury. METHODS: In this randomised, parallel-group, comparator-controlled, single-blind phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy of a new fluid protocol based on the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, which was defined as a greater than 25% or greater than 0·5 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine concentration. Between Oct 10, 2010, and July 17, 2012, 396 patients aged 18 years or older undergoing cardiac catheterisation with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) or less and one or more of several risk factors (diabetes mellitus, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, or age older than 75 years) were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided volume expansion (n=196) or the control group (n=200) who received a standard fluid administration protocol. Four computer-generated concealed randomisation schedules, each with permuted block sizes of 4, were used for randomisation, and participants were allocated to the next sequential randomisation number by sealed opaque envelopes. Patients and laboratory personnel were masked to treatment assignment, but the physicians who did the procedures were not masked. Both groups received intravenous 0·9% sodium chloride at 3 mL/kg for 1 h before cardiac catheterisation. Analyses were by intention to treat. Adverse events were assessed at 30 days and 6 months and all such events were classified by staff who were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01218828. FINDINGS: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury occurred less frequently in patients in the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided group (6·7% [12/178]) than in the control group (16·3% [28/172]; relative risk 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·79; p=0·005). Hydration treatment was terminated prematurely because of shortness of breath in three patients in each group. INTERPRETATION: Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided fluid administration seems to be safe and effective in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. FUNDING: Kaiser Permanente Southern California regional research committee grant.
Authors: David M Safley; Adam C Salisbury; Thomas T Tsai; Eric A Secemsky; Kevin F Kennedy; R Kevin Rogers; Faisal Latif; Nicolas W Shammas; Lawrence Garcia; Matthew A Cavender; Kenneth Rosenfield; Anand Prasad; John A Spertus Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Yaron Arbel; Valentin Fuster; Usman Baber; Taye H Hamza; F S Siami; Michael E Farkouh Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Mehmet Kanbay; Dimitrie Siriopol; Elif Ozdogan; Baris Afsar; Lale A Ertuglu; Mihaela Grigore; Alan A Sag; Masanari Kuwabara; Miguel A Lanaspa; Alberto Ortiz; Richard J Johnson; Adrian Covic Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Ziad A Ali; Keyvan Karimi Galougahi; Tamim Nazif; Akiko Maehara; Mark A Hardy; David J Cohen; Lloyd E Ratner; Michael B Collins; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay J Kirtane; Gregg W Stone; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Martin B Leon Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 29.983