Anne Katrin Berger1, Ulrich Abel2, Christine Komander3, Sabine Harig2, Dirk Jäger2, Christoph Springfeld2. 1. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: anne.berger@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. 3. NCT Clinical Cancer Registry, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is mainly a disease of the elderly population, but clinical trials do not reflect this age distribution. Data on treatment strategies and outcome of older patients are limited. The aim of our study was to analyze safety and outcome in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy at the outpatient clinic of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) at Heidelberg University Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients ≥70 years using a prospectively maintained database. Requirements were (1) histologically proven diagnosis of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, (2) age ≥70 at time of diagnosis of advanced disease, and (3) measurable advanced disease. RESULTS: The median age was 73 years. 81% of the patients received a gemcitabine-based first-line therapy. Median overall survival was 6.7 months. Survival differed significantly between patient groups with low (≤1) and high (≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (7.8 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.002). 30.2% of the patients developed side effects resulting in dosage reductions. 39.6% of the patients received second-line treatment. Residual survival after disease progression was significantly longer for second-line treatment compared to best supportive care (151 vs. 39 days, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our older patients did not have an inferior outcome compared to the reported trial populations that included younger patients. Thus, palliative chemotherapy should be considered independently from chronological age, but the performance status should be carefully noticed. Second-line therapy should be considered for patients in good performance status after first progression.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer is mainly a disease of the elderly population, but clinical trials do not reflect this age distribution. Data on treatment strategies and outcome of older patients are limited. The aim of our study was to analyze safety and outcome in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy at the outpatient clinic of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) at Heidelberg University Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients ≥70 years using a prospectively maintained database. Requirements were (1) histologically proven diagnosis of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, (2) age ≥70 at time of diagnosis of advanced disease, and (3) measurable advanced disease. RESULTS: The median age was 73 years. 81% of the patients received a gemcitabine-based first-line therapy. Median overall survival was 6.7 months. Survival differed significantly between patient groups with low (≤1) and high (≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (7.8 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.002). 30.2% of the patients developed side effects resulting in dosage reductions. 39.6% of the patients received second-line treatment. Residual survival after disease progression was significantly longer for second-line treatment compared to best supportive care (151 vs. 39 days, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our older patients did not have an inferior outcome compared to the reported trial populations that included younger patients. Thus, palliative chemotherapy should be considered independently from chronological age, but the performance status should be carefully noticed. Second-line therapy should be considered for patients in good performance status after first progression.
Authors: M Kojic; M Milosevic; V Simic; E J Koay; J B Fleming; S Nizzero; N Kojic; A Ziemys; M Ferrari Journal: Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 6.756
Authors: Anne Katrin Berger; Stefanie Zschaebitz; Christine Komander; Dirk Jäger; Georg Martin Haag Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jonathan J Hue; Katherine Bingmer; Kavin Sugumar; Lee M Ocuin; Luke D Rothermel; Jordan M Winter; John B Ammori; Jeffrey M Hardacre Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Anne Katrin Berger; Georg Martin Haag; Martin Ehmann; Anne Byl; Dirk Jäger; Christoph Springfeld Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 3.067