Literature DB >> 24854253

Tracking low back problems in a major self-insured workforce: toward improvement in the patient's journey.

Harris Allen1, Marcia Wright, Terri Craig, Jack Mardekian, Raymond Cheung, Robert Sanchez, William B Bunn, William Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost outcomes of treatment approaches to care for back problems in a major self-insured workforce, using published guidelines to focus on low back pain.
METHODS: Longitudinally tracked episodes of three types of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis code-identified back problems (n=14,787) during 2001 to 2009. Identified five patterns of care on the basis of the first 6 weeks of claims and compared their total costs per episode with tests that included splits by episode type and duration, use of guidelines, and propensity-derived adjustments.
RESULTS: Care congruent with 10 of 11 guidelines was linked to lower total costs. Of the five patterns, complex medical management and chiropractic reported the highest and lowest rates, respectively, of guideline-incongruent use of imaging, surgeries, and medications, and the highest and lowest total costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Approaches marked by higher resource utilization and lower guideline congruence are linked to greater low back pain total costs. Total cost is a needed input for guideline development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24854253     DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  9 in total

1.  Association Between the Type of First Healthcare Provider and the Duration of Financial Compensation for Occupational Back Pain.

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; Michèle Rivard; Clermont E Dionne; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ivan Steenstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  Defining and measuring imaging appropriateness in low back pain studies: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Crystian B Oliveira; James B Galloway; Chris G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The Effect of Reduced Access to Chiropractic Care on Medical Service Use for Spine Conditions Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Matthew Davis; Olga Yakusheva; Haiyin Liu; Brian Anderson; Julie Bynum
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 1.300

Review 4.  A Framework for Understanding How Variation in Health Care Service Delivery Affects Work Disability Management.

Authors:  Kimberly Sharpe; Kimberlyn McGrail; Cameron Mustard; Christopher McLeod
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-09

5.  A Survey of American Chiropractic Association Members' Experiences, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Practice in Integrated Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Leo J Bronston; Lauren E Austin-McClellan; Anthony J Lisi; Kevin C Donovan; Walter W Engle
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 6.  A systematic review comparing the costs of chiropractic care to other interventions for spine pain in the United States.

Authors:  Simon Dagenais; O'Dane Brady; Scott Haldeman; Pran Manga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Clinician education unlikely effective for guideline-adherent medication prescription in low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Daniel L Belavy; Scott D Tagliaferri; Paul Buntine; Tobias Saueressig; Kate Sadler; Christy Ko; Clint T Miller; Patrick J Owen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-01-03

8.  Characteristics and productivity of the chiropractic workforce of the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Kelsey L Corcoran; Douglas R Peterson; Xiwen Zhao; Eileen A Moran; Anthony J Lisi
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2022-04-11

9.  Workers' characteristics associated with the type of healthcare provider first seen for occupational back pain.

Authors:  Marc-André Blanchette; Michèle Rivard; Clermont E Dionne; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ivan Steenstra
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.