Literature DB >> 24853451

Activity classification based on inertial and barometric pressure sensors at different anatomical locations.

A Moncada-Torres1, K Leuenberger, R Gonzenbach, A Luft, R Gassert.   

Abstract

Miniature, wearable sensor modules are a promising technology to monitor activities of daily living (ADL) over extended periods of time. To assure both user compliance and meaningful results, the selection and placement site of sensors requires careful consideration. We investigated these aspects for the classification of 16 ADL in 6 healthy subjects under laboratory conditions using ReSense, our custom-made inertial measurement unit enhanced with a barometric pressure sensor used to capture activity-related altitude changes. Subjects wore a module on each wrist and ankle, and one on the trunk. Activities comprised whole body movements as well as gross and dextrous upper-limb activities. Wrist-module data outperformed the other locations for the three activity groups. Specifically, overall classification accuracy rates of almost 93% and more than 95% were achieved for the repeated holdout and user-specific validation methods, respectively, for all 16 activities. Including the altitude profile resulted in a considerable improvement of up to 20% in the classification accuracy for stair ascent and descent. The gyroscopes provided no useful information for activity classification under this scheme. The proposed sensor setting could allow for robust long-term activity monitoring with high compliance in different patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24853451     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/7/1245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  27 in total

1.  Auto detection and segmentation of physical activities during a Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) task in healthy older adults using multiple inertial sensors.

Authors:  Hung P Nguyen; Fouaz Ayachi; Catherine Lavigne-Pelletier; Margaux Blamoutier; Fariborz Rahimi; Patrick Boissy; Mandar Jog; Christian Duval
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 2.  A survey of online activity recognition using mobile phones.

Authors:  Muhammad Shoaib; Stephan Bosch; Ozlem Durmaz Incel; Hans Scholten; Paul J M Havinga
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Ferhat Attal; Samer Mohammed; Mariam Dedabrishvili; Faicel Chamroukhi; Latifa Oukhellou; Yacine Amirat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Monitoring Upper Limb Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Insights beyond Assessment Scores.

Authors:  Michael Brogioli; Sophie Schneider; Werner L Popp; Urs Albisser; Anne K Brust; Inge-Marie Velstra; Roger Gassert; Armin Curt; Michelle L Starkey
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Performance Evaluation of State of the Art Systems for Physical Activity Classification of Older Subjects Using Inertial Sensors in a Real Life Scenario: A Benchmark Study.

Authors:  Muhammad Awais; Luca Palmerini; Alan K Bourke; Espen A F Ihlen; Jorunn L Helbostad; Lorenzo Chiari
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Recognition of Daily Gestures with Wearable Inertial Rings and Bracelets.

Authors:  Alessandra Moschetti; Laura Fiorini; Dario Esposito; Paolo Dario; Filippo Cavallo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Tracking the Evolution of Smartphone Sensing for Monitoring Human Movement.

Authors:  Michael B del Rosario; Stephen J Redmond; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Improving activity recognition using a wearable barometric pressure sensor in mobility-impaired stroke patients.

Authors:  Fabien Massé; Roman R Gonzenbach; Arash Arami; Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu; Andreas R Luft; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Parameterization and reliability of single-leg balance test assessed with inertial sensors in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  David Perez-Cruzado; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Complex Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone and Wrist-Worn Motion Sensors.

Authors:  Muhammad Shoaib; Stephan Bosch; Ozlem Durmaz Incel; Hans Scholten; Paul J M Havinga
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.