Felix G Meinel1, Andre Yaroshenko, Katharina Hellbach, Martin Bech, Mark Müller, Astrid Velroyen, Fabian Bamberg, Oliver Eickelberg, Konstantin Nikolaou, Maximilian F Reiser, Franz Pfeiffer, Ali Ö Yildirim. 1. From the *Institute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich; †Lehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department & Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany; ‡Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; §Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen; and ∥Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the recently developed method of grating-based x-ray dark-field radiography can improve the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulmonary emphysema was induced in female C57BL/6N mice using endotracheal instillation of porcine pancreatic elastase and confirmed by in vivo pulmonary function tests, histopathology, and quantitative morphometry. The mice were anesthetized but breathing freely during imaging. Experiments were performed using a prototype small-animal x-ray dark-field scanner that was operated at 35 kilovolt (peak) with an exposure time of 5 seconds for each of the 10 grating steps. Images were compared visually. For quantitative comparison of signal characteristics, regions of interest were placed in the upper, middle, and lower zones of each lung. Receiver-operating-characteristic statistics were performed to compare the effectiveness of transmission and dark-field signal intensities and the combined parameter "normalized scatter" to differentiate between healthy and emphysematous lungs. RESULTS: A clear visual difference between healthy and emphysematous mice was found for the dark-field images. Quantitative measurements of x-ray dark-field signal and normalized scatter were significantly different between the mice with pulmonary emphysema and the control mice and showed good agreement with pulmonary function tests and quantitative histology. The normalized scatter showed a significantly higher discriminatory power (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve [AUC], 0.99) than dark-field (AUC, 0.90; P = 0.01) or transmission signal (AUC, 0.69; P < 0.001) alone did, allowing for an excellent discrimination of healthy and emphysematous lung regions. CONCLUSIONS: In a murine model, x-ray dark-field radiography is technically feasible in vivo and represents a substantial improvement over conventional transmission-based x-ray imaging for the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the recently developed method of grating-based x-ray dark-field radiography can improve the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Pulmonary emphysema was induced in female C57BL/6N mice using endotracheal instillation of porcine pancreatic elastase and confirmed by in vivo pulmonary function tests, histopathology, and quantitative morphometry. The mice were anesthetized but breathing freely during imaging. Experiments were performed using a prototype small-animal x-ray dark-field scanner that was operated at 35 kilovolt (peak) with an exposure time of 5 seconds for each of the 10 grating steps. Images were compared visually. For quantitative comparison of signal characteristics, regions of interest were placed in the upper, middle, and lower zones of each lung. Receiver-operating-characteristic statistics were performed to compare the effectiveness of transmission and dark-field signal intensities and the combined parameter "normalized scatter" to differentiate between healthy and emphysematous lungs. RESULTS: A clear visual difference between healthy and emphysematous mice was found for the dark-field images. Quantitative measurements of x-ray dark-field signal and normalized scatter were significantly different between the mice with pulmonary emphysema and the control mice and showed good agreement with pulmonary function tests and quantitative histology. The normalized scatter showed a significantly higher discriminatory power (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve [AUC], 0.99) than dark-field (AUC, 0.90; P = 0.01) or transmission signal (AUC, 0.69; P < 0.001) alone did, allowing for an excellent discrimination of healthy and emphysematous lung regions. CONCLUSIONS: In a murine model, x-ray dark-field radiography is technically feasible in vivo and represents a substantial improvement over conventional transmission-based x-ray imaging for the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema.
Authors: Peter Modregger; Tiziana P Cremona; Charaf Benarafa; Johannes C Schittny; Alessandro Olivo; Marco Endrizzi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: A Velroyen; A Yaroshenko; D Hahn; A Fehringer; A Tapfer; M Müller; P B Noël; B Pauwels; A Sasov; A Ö Yildirim; O Eickelberg; K Hellbach; S D Auweter; F G Meinel; M F Reiser; M Bech; F Pfeiffer Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Andreas P Sauter; Jana Andrejewski; Manuela Frank; Konstantin Willer; Julia Herzen; Felix Meurer; Alexander A Fingerle; Markus R Makowski; Franz Pfeiffer; Daniela Pfeiffer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Andre Yaroshenko; Tina Pritzke; Markus Koschlig; Nona Kamgari; Konstantin Willer; Lukas Gromann; Sigrid Auweter; Katharina Hellbach; Maximilian Reiser; Oliver Eickelberg; Franz Pfeiffer; Anne Hilgendorff Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Andre Yaroshenko; Katharina Hellbach; Ali Önder Yildirim; Thomas M Conlon; Isis Enlil Fernandez; Martin Bech; Astrid Velroyen; Felix G Meinel; Sigrid Auweter; Maximilian Reiser; Oliver Eickelberg; Franz Pfeiffer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Florian Horn; Martino Leghissa; Sebastian Kaeppler; Georg Pelzer; Jens Rieger; Maria Seifert; Johannes Wandner; Thomas Weber; Thilo Michel; Christian Riess; Gisela Anton Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.379