| Literature DB >> 24852811 |
Maureen Mayhew1, Paul Ickx, Hedayatullah Stanekzai, Taufiq Mashal, William Newbrander.
Abstract
In Afghanistan, malnutrition in children less than 60 months of age remains high despite nutritional services being offered in health facilities since 2003. Afghanistan's Ministry of Public Health solicited extensive community consultation to develop pictorial community-based growth monitoring and promotion (cGMP) tools to help illiterate community health workers (CHWs) provide nutritional assessment and counselling. The planned evaluation in the five districts where cGMP was implemented demonstrated that a mean weight-for-age (WFA) Z-score of 414 participant children was 0.3 Z-scores higher than that of matched non-participants who lived outside of cGMP programme catchment areas. The mean change in WFA Z-scores at evaluation was 0.3 (95% CI 0.3, 0.4) Z-scores higher than at entry into the programme. The most influential factor on WFA Z-score changes in participants was initial WFA Z-score. Those with an initial WFA Z-score of less than -2 experienced a mean increase of 0.33 (95% CI 0.29, 0.38) WFA Z-scores per session attended, while those with a baseline WFA Z-score of greater than zero showed a decrease of 0.19 (95% CI 0.22, 0.15) WFA Z-scores per session attended. These results are encouraging since they demonstrate that the cGMP programme in Afghanistan for illiterate women has some potential to contribute to improving nutrition, specifically in underweight children of either sex who enter the programme at less than nine months of age and attend 50% or more sessions.Entities:
Keywords: Afghanistan; child health; community-based health services; growth monitoring; health promotion; nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24852811 PMCID: PMC4136669 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2014.917194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Public Health ISSN: 1744-1692
Figure 1.Afghan community platform for integrated child survival programme, including nutrition.
Figure 2.Pictorial assessment tool used by CHWs to assess appropriate weight gain.
Figure 3.Map of five demonstration districts for cGMP programme.
Characteristics of caretakers and children and WFA Z-scores in participants and non-participants.
| Characteristic | Non-participants | Participants | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 414 | 414 | ||
| Province[ | |||
| Kabul | 83 (20.0%) | 83 (20.0%) | na |
| Bamyan | 103 (24.9%) | 103 (24.9%) | na |
| Herat | 105 (25.4%) | 105 (25.4%) | na |
| Jawzjan | 50 (12.1%) | 50 (12.1%) | na |
| Takhar | 73 (17.6%) | 73 (17.6%) | na |
| Caretaker characteristics | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |
| Mean age in years | 27.6 (27.1, 28.2) | 27.5 (27.0, 28.1) | 0.9 |
| Literacy | 0.06 | ||
| Illiterate (not able to read, write or count) | 88.4% (85.3, 91.5) | 82.6% (78.9, 86.3) | |
| Literacy (percentage able to read, write and count) | 5.7% (3.3, 7.8) | 8.3% (5.5,11.1) | |
| Refused to answer | 6.3% (3.9, 8.6) | 9.9% (7.0, 12.8) | |
| Able to count | 100% | 99.9% (99.6, 100) | 0.3 |
| Mean no. years schooling | 0.4 (0.2, 0.6) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.5) | 0.9 |
| Child characteristics | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |
| Child age in months at evaluation | 11.2 (10.9, 11.6) | 11.2 (10.9,11.6) | 1.0 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 55% | 55% | na |
| Female | 45% | 45% | na |
| Mean birth order of child | 3.7 (3.5, 3.9) | 3.8 (3.6, 4.0) | 0.5 |
| Mean no. of children | 3.7 (3.5, 3.9) | 3.8 (3.6, 4.0) | 0.5 |
| Health of child | N (%) | N (%) | |
| Sick | 74 (18%) | 75 (18%) | 1.0 |
| Somewhat healthy | 168 (41%) | 155 (37%) | 0.2 |
| Healthy | 154 (37%) | 167 (40%) | 0.4 |
| No answer | 18 (4%) | 17 (4%) | 1.0 |
| cGMP programme attendance | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |
| Percentage of planned sessions attended | na | 87.0% (85.6,88.4) | na |
| Number of sessions attended | 7.1 (6.8, 7.3) | na | |
| Reasons for | Non-attendance | Attendance | |
| Sick child | 2 (0.5%) | 31 (8%) | <0.001 |
| Healthy child | 11 (3%) | – | |
| Knowledge or beliefs | 149 (36%) | 354 (86%) | <0.001 |
| Child accompanied siblings | na | 10 (2%) | |
| Child received care elsewhere | 34 (8%) | na | |
| No local resources | 217 (52%) | na | |
| Child required food | 8 (2%) | ||
| Do not know | 11 (3%) | ||
| Mean weight for age | Mean (95% CI) | Mean (95% CI) | |
| Using unclothed child weights | |||
| Evaluation visit | −1.2 (−1.3, −1.1) | −0.9 (−1.0, −0.8) | <0.01 |
| Evaluation visit (age from vaccination card only | −1.1 (−1.2, −1.0) | −0.9 (−1.0, −0.8) | <0.01 |
| Using clothed child weights | |||
| Evaluation visit | −0.8 (−0.9, −0.7) | 0.9 | |
| Last cGMP visit | −0.8 (−0.9, −0.7) | 0.9 | |
| Difference in WFA | Mean (95% CI) | ||
| | 411 | ||
| Last cGMP visit | 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) | <0.001 | |
| Last cGMP visit (age from vaccination card only | 0.4 (0.2, 0.5) | <0.001 | |
| Evaluation visit | 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) | <0.001 | |
| Evaluation visit (age from vaccination card only | 0.4 (0.2, 0.6) | <0.001 | |
| Difference in WFA | Mean (95% CI) | ||
| Last cGMP visit | 0.04 (0.02, 0.06) | ||
| By initial WFA | <0.001 | ||
| Less than −2 | 0.24 (0.20, 0.29) | ||
| −2 to less than 0 | 0.02 (0.00, 0.04) | ||
| 0 or higher | −0.15 (−0.19, −0.11) | ||
| Evaluation visit | 0.05 (0.02, 0.08) | ||
| By initial WFA | <0.001 | ||
| Less than −2 | 0.33 (0.29, 0.38) | ||
| −2 to less than 0 | 0.01 (0.01, 0.04) | ||
| 0 or higher | −0.19 (−0.22, −0.15) |
Statistical significance set to 0.05.
Although male and female CHWs were trained, only female CHWs were used for the cGMP programmes with the exception of Bamyan, where it was culturally acceptable to have male CHWs provide this service for female caretakers.
Determinants of changes in WFA Z-scores amongst participants of cGMP programme.
| WFA | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome variable | Uncontrolled model | Controlled model | Uncontrolled model | Controlled model | ||||
| Independent variable (95% CI) | Regression coefficient | Regression coefficient | Regression coefficient | Regression coefficient | ||||
| | 388 | 388 | 382 | 382 | ||||
| Caretaker literacy | ||||||||
| Not literate | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Literate | −0.08 (−0.63, 0.46) | 0.8 | 0.21 (−0.20, 0.62) | 0.6 | −0.19 (−0.66, 0.29) | 0.4 | 0.16 (−0.22, 0.55) | 0.4 |
| No answer | −0.06 (−0.44, 0.33) | 0.8 | −0.40 (−0.82, 0.01) | 0.06 | 0.36 (−0.01, 0.72) | 0.06 | ||
| Size of family | −0.04 (−0.11, 0.03) | 0.4 | −0.02 (−0.08, 0.03) | 0.4 | 0.01 (−0.08, 0.05) | 0.7 | 0.00 (−0.05, 0.05) | 0.98 |
| Sex of child | ||||||||
| Female | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Male | −0.18 (−0.48, 0.12) | 0.2 | −0.19 (−0.44, 0.06) | 0.1 | ||||
| Age of first contact | −0.03 (−0.10, 0.04) | 0.4 | 0.00 (−0.05, 0.05) | 0.9 | 0.03 (−0.03, 0.09) | 0.4 | ||
| WFA | ||||||||
| | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||
| −2< | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| Percentage of sessions attended | 0.57 (−0.30, 1.43) | 0.2 | 0.43 (−0.34, 1.20) | 0.3 | ||||
| Province[ | ||||||||
| Kabul | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | – | |||
| Bamyan | 0.31 (−0.01, 0.63) | 0.06 | ||||||
| Herat | 0.31 (−0.12, 0.73) | 0.2 | 0.31 (−0.02, 0.64) | 0.07 | 0.21 (−0.15, 0.57) | 0.3 | ||
| Jawzjan | ||||||||
| Takhar | ||||||||
| Constant | ||||||||
| 0.55 | 0.43 | |||||||
| Adjusted | 0.53 | 0.41 | ||||||
| Probability > | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
Note: Bold values indicate statistical significance based on p < 0.05 and non-overlapping confidence intervals.
In the controlled regression models in which the initial WFA Z-score variable was changed from categorical to continuous, a 0.79 (95% CI 0.73, 0.86) increase in WFA Z-score per unit decrease in initial WFA Z-score for the evaluation visit and a 0.61 (95% CI 0.55, 0.68) increase in WFA Z-score per unit decrease in initial WFA Z-score for the last cGMP visit were demonstrated.
Although male and female CHWs were trained, only female CHWs were used for the cGMP programmes with the exception of Bamyan, where it was culturally acceptable to have male CHWs provide this service for female caretakers.
Figure 4.Determinants of WFA Z-score changes in the last cGMP visit and evaluation visit. Notes: Coefficients of variation were controlled for family size, child sex, and age of child at first cGMP visit. *Reference category was illiterate caretaker. †Reference category was initial WFA Z-score zero or above. ‡Reference category was Kabul Province.
Figure 5.WFA Z-score differences: Last cGMP visit compared to initial visit.
Figure 6.WFA Z-score differences: Evaluation visit compared to initial cGMP visit.