OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and cortical thickness (CTh) in preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, normal controls (n = 145) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent structural 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lumbar puncture. CSF β-amyloid1-42 (Aβ) and phospho-tau₁₈₁p (p-tau) levels were measured by Luminex assays. Samples were dichotomized using published cutoffs (Aβ(+) /Aβ(-) and p-tau(+) /ptau(-)). CTh was measured by Freesurfer. CTh difference maps were derived from interaction and correlation analyses. Clusters from the interaction analysis were isolated to analyze the directionality of the interaction by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: We found a significant biomarker interaction between CSF Aβ and CSF p-tau levels affecting brain structure. Cortical atrophy only occurs in subjects with both Aβ(+) and p-tau(+). The stratified correlation analyses showed that the relationship between p-tau and CTh is modified by Aβ status and the relationship between Aβ and CTh is modified by p-tau status. p-Tau-dependent thinning was found in different cortical regions in Aβ(+) subjects but not in Aβ(-) subjects. Cortical thickening was related to decreasing CSF Aβ values in the absence of abnormal p-tau, but no correlations were found in p-tau(+) subjects. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that interactions between biomarkers in AD result in a 2-phase phenomenon of pathological cortical thickening associated with low CSF Aβ, followed by atrophy once CSF p-tau becomes abnormal. These interactions should be considered in clinical trials in preclinical AD, both when selecting patients and when using MRI as a surrogate marker of efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and cortical thickness (CTh) in preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, normal controls (n = 145) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent structural 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lumbar puncture. CSF β-amyloid1-42 (Aβ) and phospho-tau₁₈₁p (p-tau) levels were measured by Luminex assays. Samples were dichotomized using published cutoffs (Aβ(+) /Aβ(-) and p-tau(+) /ptau(-)). CTh was measured by Freesurfer. CTh difference maps were derived from interaction and correlation analyses. Clusters from the interaction analysis were isolated to analyze the directionality of the interaction by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: We found a significant biomarker interaction between CSF Aβ and CSF p-tau levels affecting brain structure. Cortical atrophy only occurs in subjects with both Aβ(+) and p-tau(+). The stratified correlation analyses showed that the relationship between p-tau and CTh is modified by Aβ status and the relationship between Aβ and CTh is modified by p-tau status. p-Tau-dependent thinning was found in different cortical regions in Aβ(+) subjects but not in Aβ(-) subjects. Cortical thickening was related to decreasing CSF Aβ values in the absence of abnormal p-tau, but no correlations were found in p-tau(+) subjects. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that interactions between biomarkers in AD result in a 2-phase phenomenon of pathological cortical thickening associated with low CSF Aβ, followed by atrophy once CSF p-tau becomes abnormal. These interactions should be considered in clinical trials in preclinical AD, both when selecting patients and when using MRI as a surrogate marker of efficacy.
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Christine L Tardif; Gabriel A Devenyi; Robert S C Amaral; Sandra Pelleieux; Judes Poirier; Pedro Rosa-Neto; John Breitner; M Mallar Chakravarty Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Chelsea C Hays; Zvinka Z Zlatar; M J Meloy; Jessica Osuna; Thomas T Liu; Douglas R Galasko; Christina E Wierenga Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Olga Pletnikova; Gay L Rudow; Thomas M Hyde; Joel E Kleinman; Sabeen Z Ali; Rahul Bharadwaj; Salina Gangadeen; Barbara J Crain; David R Fowler; Ana I Rubio; Juan C Troncoso Journal: Cogn Behav Neurol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: Jian W Dong; Ileana O Jelescu; Benjamin Ades-Aron; Dmitry S Novikov; Kent Friedman; James S Babb; Ricardo S Osorio; James E Galvin; Timothy M Shepherd; Els Fieremans Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Henrik Zetterberg; Tobias Skillbäck; Niklas Mattsson; John Q Trojanowski; Erik Portelius; Leslie M Shaw; Michael W Weiner; Kaj Blennow Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Claire André; Stéphane Rehel; Elizabeth Kuhn; Brigitte Landeau; Inès Moulinet; Edelweiss Touron; Valentin Ourry; Gwendoline Le Du; Florence Mézenge; Clémence Tomadesso; Robin de Flores; Alexandre Bejanin; Siya Sherif; Nicolas Delcroix; Alain Manrique; Ahmed Abbas; Natalie L Marchant; Antoine Lutz; Olga M Klimecki; Fabienne Collette; Eider M Arenaza-Urquijo; Géraldine Poisnel; Denis Vivien; Françoise Bertran; Vincent de la Sayette; Gaël Chételat; Géraldine Rauchs Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Jonathan Spiegel; Elizabeth Pirraglia; Ricardo S Osorio; Lidia Glodzik; Yi Li; Wai Tsui; Leslie A Saint Louis; Catherine Randall; Tracy Butler; Jinfeng Xu; Raymond P Zinkowski; Henrik Zetterberg; Juan Fortea; Silvia Fossati; Thomas Wisniewski; Peter Davies; Kaj Blennow; Mony J de Leon Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.472