Literature DB >> 24852569

In Barrett's esophagus patients and Barrett's cell lines, ursodeoxycholic acid increases antioxidant expression and prevents DNA damage by bile acids.

Sui Peng1, Xiaofang Huo2, Davood Rezaei3, Qiuyang Zhang2, Xi Zhang2, Chunhua Yu2, Kiyotaka Asanuma2, Edaire Cheng4, Thai H Pham5, David H Wang2, Minhu Chen6, Rhonda F Souza7, Stuart Jon Spechler2.   

Abstract

Hydrophobic bile acids like deoxycholic acid (DCA), which cause oxidative DNA damage and activate NF-κB in Barrett's metaplasia, might contribute to carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus. We have explored mechanisms whereby ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, a hydrophilic bile acid) protects against DCA-induced injury in vivo in patients and in vitro using nonneoplastic, telomerase-immortalized Barrett's cell lines. We took biopsies of Barrett's esophagus from 21 patients before and after esophageal perfusion with DCA (250 μM) at baseline and after 8 wk of oral UDCA treatment. DNA damage was assessed by phospho-H2AX expression, neutral CometAssay, and phospho-H2AX nuclear foci formation. Quantitative PCR was performed for antioxidants including catalase and GPX1. Nrf2, catalase, and GPX1 were knocked down with siRNAs. Reporter assays were performed using a plasmid construct containing antioxidant responsive element. In patients, baseline esophageal perfusion with DCA significantly increased phospho-H2AX and phospho-p65 in Barrett's metaplasia. Oral UDCA increased GPX1 and catalase levels in Barrett's metaplasia and prevented DCA perfusion from inducing DNA damage and NF-κB activation. In cells, DCA-induced DNA damage and NF-κB activation was prevented by 24-h pretreatment with UDCA, but not by mixing UDCA with DCA. UDCA activated Nrf2 signaling to increase GPX1 and catalase expression, and protective effects of UDCA pretreatment were blocked by siRNA knockdown of these antioxidants. UDCA increases expression of antioxidants that prevent toxic bile acids from causing DNA damage and NF-κB activation in Barrett's metaplasia. Elucidation of this molecular pathway for UDCA protection provides rationale for clinical trials on UDCA for chemoprevention in Barrett's esophagus.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPX1; bile acids; catalase; chemoprevention; esophageal adenocarcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24852569      PMCID: PMC4101678          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00085.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  35 in total

1.  Suppression of gastric acid secretion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease results in gastric bacterial overgrowth and deconjugation of bile acids.

Authors:  J Theisen; D Nehra; D Citron; J Johansson; J A Hagen; P F Crookes; S R DeMeester; C G Bremner; T R DeMeester; J H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M F Vaezi; J E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Antioxidant properties of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Authors:  Domenico Lapenna; Giuliano Ciofani; Davide Festi; Matteo Neri; Sante D Pierdomenico; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Franco Cuccurullo
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 4.  The role of DNA breaks in genomic instability and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Kevin D Mills; David O Ferguson; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Composition of gastro-oesophageal refluxate.

Authors:  D C Gotley; A P Morgan; D Ball; R W Owen; M J Cooper
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Molecular aspects of membrane stabilization by ursodeoxycholate [see comment].

Authors:  S Güldütuna; G Zimmer; M Imhof; S Bhatti; T You; U Leuschner
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Bile reflux in columnar-lined Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  S Y Iftikhar; S Ledingham; R J Steele; D F Evans; K Lendrum; M Atkinson; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Mechanism of action of chemoprotective ursodeoxycholate in the azoxymethane model of rat colonic carcinogenesis: potential roles of protein kinase C-alpha, -beta II, and -zeta.

Authors:  R K Wali; B P Frawley; S Hartmann; H K Roy; S Khare; B A Scaglione-Sewell; D L Earnest; M D Sitrin; T A Brasitus; M Bissonnette
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  The cytotoxicity of hydrophobic bile acids is ameliorated by more hydrophilic bile acids in intestinal cell lines IEC-6 and Caco-2.

Authors:  Yoshio Araki; Akira Andoh; Hiromichi Bamba; Kouhei Yoshikawa; Hisakazu Doi; Yasunobu Komai; Akihiko Higuchi; Yoshihide Fujiyama
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Malignant transformation of non-neoplastic Barrett's epithelial cells through well-defined genetic manipulations.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Chunhua Yu; Kathleen Wilson; Hui Ying Zhang; Shelby D Melton; Xiaofang Huo; David H Wang; Robert M Genta; Stuart J Spechler; Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  22 in total

1.  In Barrett's epithelial cells, weakly acidic bile salt solutions cause oxidative DNA damage with response and repair mediated by p38.

Authors:  Xiaofang Huo; Kerry B Dunbar; Xi Zhang; Qiuyang Zhang; Stuart Jon Spechler; Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  Diagnostic and Management Implications of Basic Science Advances in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Meghan Jankowski; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Chemoprevention of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Robert S Bresalier
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  From Reflux Esophagitis to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.404

5.  Clinical Study of Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Barrett's Esophagus Patients.

Authors:  Bhaskar Banerjee; Nicholas J Shaheen; Jessica A Martinez; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Eugene Trowers; Blake A Gibson; Gary Della'Zanna; Ellen Richmond; H-H Sherry Chow
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-02-23

6.  Relationship between Barrett's esophagus and colonic diseases: a role for colonoscopy in Barrett's surveillance.

Authors:  Yuji Amano; Ryotaro Nakahara; Takafumi Yuki; Daisuke Murakami; Tetsuro Ujihara; Iwaki Tomoyuki; Ryota Sagami; Satoshi Suehiro; Yasushi Katsuyama; Kenji Hayasaka; Hideaki Harada; Yasumasa Tada; Youichi Miyaoka; Hirofumi Fujishiro
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Expression, modulation, and clinical correlates of the autophagy protein Beclin-1 in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine M Weh; Amy B Howell; Laura A Kresty
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.784

8.  Metabolism of Oxo-Bile Acids and Characterization of Recombinant 12α-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases from Bile Acid 7α-Dehydroxylating Human Gut Bacteria.

Authors:  Heidi Doden; Lina A Sallam; Saravanan Devendran; Lindsey Ly; Greta Doden; Steven L Daniel; João M P Alves; Jason M Ridlon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Does anti-reflux surgery disrupt the pathway of Barrett's esophagus progression to cancer?

Authors:  Sebastian F Schoppmann; Ivan Kristo; Martin Riegler
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 10.  Barrett's Esophagus and Intestinal Metaplasia.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Binyu Sun; Xi Zhou; QiongQiong Wei; Sicheng Liang; Gang Luo; Tao Li; Muhan Lü
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.