Literature DB >> 24852471

An interrater and intrarater reliability study of 3 photographic scales for the classification of perioral aesthetic features.

Joel L Cohen1, Jane Thomas, Deepali Paradkar, Adam Rotunda, Patricia S Walker, Frederick C Beddingfield, Asha Philip, Paula G Davis, Ramana Yalamanchili.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Validated aesthetic rating scales for the perioral area provide objective evaluations for clinical trials and practice.
OBJECTIVE: To confirm the reliability of 3 scales for evaluating dermal filler and neurotoxin treatments of the perioral area.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three lip-specific photographic scales were developed from standardized 2-dimensional images to evaluate Perioral Lines at Rest (POL), Oral Commissures (OCS), and Perioral Lines at Maximum Contraction (POLM) severity scales. Each 4-grade scale (none to severe) had 3 representative images per grade. Physician validators rated volunteers on each scale (2 rounds of live review). Volunteers provided 2 series of self-assessments. Physician and subject intrarater reliability were based on the comparison of round 1 and round 2 scores (mean weighted kappa coefficient). Other measures were physician interrater agreement (intraclass correlation) and subject/physician interrater agreement (Pearson correlation).
RESULTS: Physician intrarater agreement was almost perfect or substantial (POL, 0.725; OCS, 0.789; POLM, 0.826). Overall, physician interrater agreement was almost perfect for all 3 scales and ranged from moderate to substantial by grade. Subject intrarater agreement and subject/physician interrater agreement were substantial.
CONCLUSION: All scales demonstrated a high degree of intrarater and interrater reliability during the validation process. Physician concordance was good; subject ratings were reliable and comparable to physician assessments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24852471     DOI: 10.1111/dsu.0000000000000008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  5 in total

1.  Juvéderm volbella with lidocaine for lip and perioral enhancement: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Hervé Raspaldo; Jonquille Chantrey; Lakdhar Belhaouari; Roy Saleh; Diane K Murphy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-04-07

2.  Safety and Effectiveness of Repeat Treatment With VYC-15L for Lip and Perioral Enhancement: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Alexander Rivkin; Susan H Weinkle; Bhushan Hardas; Robert A Weiss; Dee Anna Glaser; Brian S Biesman; Andrew Schumacher; Diane K Murphy
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Classification of Mouth Corners in Asian Women.

Authors:  Tae Kwang Jeong; Young Min Kim; Kyung Hee Min
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-06

4.  A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Real-World Study of VYC-17.5L Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler in the Lips.

Authors:  Nestor Demosthenous; David Eccleston; Vitor Figueiredo; Luis Uva; Graeme Kerson; Michael Silberberg
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-05-15

5.  Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Fine Lines.

Authors:  Jean Carruthers; Lisa Donofrio; Bhushan Hardas; Diane K Murphy; Derek Jones; Alastair Carruthers; Jonathan M Sykes; Lela Creutz; Ann Marx; Sara Dill
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.398

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.