Literature DB >> 24852250

De novo detection of differentially bound regions for ChIP-seq data using peaks and windows: controlling error rates correctly.

Aaron T L Lun1, Gordon K Smyth2.   

Abstract

A common aim in ChIP-seq experiments is to identify changes in protein binding patterns between conditions, i.e. differential binding. A number of peak- and window-based strategies have been developed to detect differential binding when the regions of interest are not known in advance. However, careful consideration of error control is needed when applying these methods. Peak-based approaches use the same data set to define peaks and to detect differential binding. Done improperly, this can result in loss of type I error control. For window-based methods, controlling the false discovery rate over all detected windows does not guarantee control across all detected regions. Misinterpreting the former as the latter can result in unexpected liberalness. Here, several solutions are presented to maintain error control for these de novo counting strategies. For peak-based methods, peak calling should be performed on pooled libraries prior to the statistical analysis. For window-based methods, a hybrid approach using Simes' method is proposed to maintain control of the false discovery rate across regions. More generally, the relative advantages of peak- and window-based strategies are explored using a range of simulated and real data sets. Implementations of both strategies also compare favourably to existing programs for differential binding analyses.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24852250      PMCID: PMC4066778          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  35 in total

1.  A computational pipeline for comparative ChIP-seq analyses.

Authors:  Anaïs F Bardet; Qiye He; Julia Zeitlinger; Alexander Stark
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Detecting differential binding of transcription factors with ChIP-seq.

Authors:  Kun Liang; Sündüz Keles
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments.

Authors:  Richard Bourgon; Robert Gentleman; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A chromatin-modifying function of JNK during stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Vijay K Tiwari; Michael B Stadler; Christiane Wirbelauer; Renato Paro; Dirk Schübeler; Christian Beisel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Alicia Oshlack
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Repitools: an R package for the analysis of enrichment-based epigenomic data.

Authors:  Aaron L Statham; Dario Strbenac; Marcel W Coolen; Clare Stirzaker; Susan J Clark; Mark D Robinson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  ChIPseqR: analysis of ChIP-seq experiments.

Authors:  Peter Humburg; Chris A Helliwell; David Bulger; Glenn Stone
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  ChIP-seq analysis reveals distinct H3K27me3 profiles that correlate with transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Matthew D Young; Tracy A Willson; Matthew J Wakefield; Evelyn Trounson; Douglas J Hilton; Marnie E Blewitt; Alicia Oshlack; Ian J Majewski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Caryn S Ross-Innes; Rory Stark; Andrew E Teschendorff; Kelly A Holmes; H Raza Ali; Mark J Dunning; Gordon D Brown; Ondrej Gojis; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Simak Ali; Suet-Feung Chin; Carlo Palmieri; Carlos Caldas; Jason S Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  44 in total

1.  Sequentially acting SOX proteins orchestrate astrocyte- and oligodendrocyte-specific gene expression.

Authors:  Susanne Klum; Cécile Zaouter; Zhanna Alekseenko; Åsa K Björklund; Daniel W Hagey; Johan Ericson; Jonas Muhr; Maria Bergsland
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Differential peak calling of ChIP-seq signals with replicates with THOR.

Authors:  Manuel Allhoff; Kristin Seré; Juliana F Pires; Martin Zenke; Ivan G Costa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  H3K27 Methylation Dynamics during CD4 T Cell Activation: Regulation of JAK/STAT and IL12RB2 Expression by JMJD3.

Authors:  Sarah A LaMere; Ryan C Thompson; Xiangzhi Meng; H Kiyomi Komori; Adam Mark; Daniel R Salomon
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Detection and accurate false discovery rate control of differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulfite sequencing.

Authors:  Keegan Korthauer; Sutirtha Chakraborty; Yuval Benjamini; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Genome-Wide Epigenetic Studies in Human Disease: A Primer on -Omic Technologies.

Authors:  Huihuang Yan; Shulan Tian; Susan L Slager; Zhifu Sun; Tamas Ordog
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.

Authors:  Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  An LKB1-mitochondria axis controls TH17 effector function.

Authors:  Klara Piletic; Daniel J Puleston; Matteo Villa; Francesc Baixauli; Cameron S Field; Lea J Flachsmann; Andrea Quintana; Nisha Rana; Joy Edwards-Hicks; Mai Matsushita; Michal A Stanczak; Katarzyna M Grzes; Agnieszka M Kabat; Mario Fabri; George Caputa; Beth Kelly; Mauro Corrado; Yaarub Musa; Katarzyna J Duda; Gerhard Mittler; David O'Sullivan; Hiromi Sesaki; Thomas Jenuwein; Joerg M Buescher; Edward J Pearce; David E Sanin; Erika L Pearce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 69.504

8.  csaw: a Bioconductor package for differential binding analysis of ChIP-seq data using sliding windows.

Authors:  Aaron T L Lun; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Differential RNA methylation using multivariate statistical methods.

Authors:  Deepak Nag Ayyala; Jianan Lin; Zhengqing Ouyang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 13.994

10.  Independence of chromatin conformation and gene regulation during Drosophila dorsoventral patterning.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ing-Simmons; Roshan Vaid; Xin Yang Bing; Michael Levine; Mattias Mannervik; Juan M Vaquerizas
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.