T Sheehy1, F Kolahdooz2, S E Schaefer2, D N Douglas2, A Corriveau3, S Sharma2. 1. School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 2. Aboriginal and Global Health Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 3. Office of the Chief Public Health Officer, Department of Health and Social Services, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the Arctic diet has been derived entirely from locally harvested animal and plant species; however, in recent decades, imported foods purchased from grocery stores have become widely available. The present study aimed to examine Inuvialuit, traditional or nontraditional dietary patterns; nutrient density of the diet; dietary adequacy; and main food sources of energy and selected nutrient intakes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a culturally appropriate quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess diet. Traditional and nontraditional eaters were classified as those consuming more or less than 300 g of traditional food daily. Nutrient densities per 4184 kJ (1000 kcal) were determined. Dietary adequacy was determined by comparing participants' nutrient intakes with the Dietary Reference Intakes. RESULTS: The diet of nontraditional eaters contained, on average, a lower density of protein, niacin, vitamin B12 , iron, selenium, zinc, omega-3 fatty acids (P ≤ 0.0001), vitamin B6 , potassium, thiamin, pantothenic acid (P ≤ 0.001), riboflavin and magnesium (P ≤ 0.05). Inadequate nutrient intake was more common among nontraditional eaters for calcium, folate, vitamin C, zinc, thiamin, pantothenic acid, vitamin K, magnesium, potassium and sodium. Non-nutrient-dense foods (i.e. high fat and high sugar foods) contributed to energy intake in both groups, more so among nontraditional eaters (45% versus 33%). Traditional foods accounted for 3.3% and 20.7% of total energy intake among nontraditional and traditional eaters, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diet quality and dietary adequacy were better among Inuvialuit who consumed more traditional foods. The promotion of traditional foods should be incorporated in dietary interventions for this population.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the Arctic diet has been derived entirely from locally harvested animal and plant species; however, in recent decades, imported foods purchased from grocery stores have become widely available. The present study aimed to examine Inuvialuit, traditional or nontraditional dietary patterns; nutrient density of the diet; dietary adequacy; and main food sources of energy and selected nutrient intakes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a culturally appropriate quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess diet. Traditional and nontraditional eaters were classified as those consuming more or less than 300 g of traditional food daily. Nutrient densities per 4184 kJ (1000 kcal) were determined. Dietary adequacy was determined by comparing participants' nutrient intakes with the Dietary Reference Intakes. RESULTS: The diet of nontraditional eaters contained, on average, a lower density of protein, niacin, vitamin B12 , iron, selenium, zinc, omega-3 fatty acids (P ≤ 0.0001), vitamin B6 , potassium, thiamin, pantothenic acid (P ≤ 0.001), riboflavin and magnesium (P ≤ 0.05). Inadequate nutrient intake was more common among nontraditional eaters for calcium, folate, vitamin C, zinc, thiamin, pantothenic acid, vitamin K, magnesium, potassium and sodium. Non-nutrient-dense foods (i.e. high fat and high sugar foods) contributed to energy intake in both groups, more so among nontraditional eaters (45% versus 33%). Traditional foods accounted for 3.3% and 20.7% of total energy intake among nontraditional and traditional eaters, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diet quality and dietary adequacy were better among Inuvialuit who consumed more traditional foods. The promotion of traditional foods should be incorporated in dietary interventions for this population.
Authors: Lesya Marushka; Xuefeng Hu; Malek Batal; Tonio Sadik; Harold Schwartz; Amy Ing; Karen Fediuk; Constantine Tikhonov; Hing Man Chan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lesya Marushka; Tiff-Annie Kenny; Malek Batal; William W L Cheung; Karen Fediuk; Christopher D Golden; Anne K Salomon; Tonio Sadik; Lauren V Weatherdon; Hing Man Chan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julia McCartan; Emma van Burgel; Isobelle McArthur; Sharni Testa; Elisabeth Thurn; Sarah Funston; Angel Kho; Emma McMahon; Julie Brimblecombe Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2020-11-24
Authors: Lesya Marushka; Malek Batal; Constantine Tikhonov; Tonio Sadik; Harold Schwartz; Amy Ing; Karen Fediuk; Hing Man Chan Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2021-06-28
Authors: Wan Ying Gan; Norhasmah Sulaiman; Leh Shii Law; Nurzalinda Zalbahar; Salma Faeza Ahmad Fuzi; Martin A Wilkes Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-04 Impact factor: 3.390