Literature DB >> 24850886

The effect of sample storage on the performance and reproducibility of the galactomannan EIA test.

George Kimpton1, P Lewis White2, Rosemary A Barnes1.   

Abstract

Galactomannan enzyme immune assay (GM EIA) is a nonculture test for detecting invasive aspergillosis (IA) forming a key part of diagnosis and management. Recent reports have questioned the reproducibility of indices after sample storage. To investigate this, 198 serum samples (72 from cases and 126 from controls) and 61 plasma samples (24 from cases and 37 from controls), initially tested between 2010 and 2013, were retested to determine any change in index. Data were also collected on circulatory protein levels for false-positive serum samples. Serum indices significantly declined on retesting (median: initial, 0.50, retest, 0.23; P < 0.0001). This was shown to be diagnosis dependent as the decline was apparent on retesting of control samples (median: initial 0.50, retest 0.12; P < 0.0001), but was not evident with case samples (median: initial, 0.80, retest, 0.80; P = 0.724). Plasma samples showed little change on reanalysis after long-term storage at 4°C. Retesting after freezing showed a decrease in index values for controls (median: initial 0.40, retest 0.26; P = 0.0505), but no significant change in cases. Circulatory proteins showed a correlation between serum albumin concentration and difference in index value on retesting. Overall, this study suggests that a lack of reproducibility in GM EIA positivity is only significant when disease is absent. Retesting after freezing helps to differentiate false-positive GM EIA results and, with consecutive positivity, could help to improve accuracy in predicting disease status. The freezing of samples prior to testing could potentially reduce false-positivity rates and the need to retest.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IA diagnosis; aspergillosis; galactomannan EIA; retesting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24850886     DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myu014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Mycol        ISSN: 1369-3786            Impact factor:   4.076


  5 in total

1.  Improved Standardization of the Bio-Rad Platelia Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Sandwich Enzyme Immunoassay Using the DS2 (Dynex) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Processing System.

Authors:  R L Gorton; P L White; E Bagkeris; D Cotterall; R Desai; T McHugh; C C Kibbler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Insufficient demonstration of long-term stability of Aspergillus galactomannan.

Authors:  Gemma L Johnson; Shah-Jalal Sarker; Stephen A Bustin; Samir G Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Instability of Aspergillus galactomannan in stored clinical samples.

Authors:  Simon F Dufresne; Stéphanie Beauchemin; Christian Lavallée; Michel Laverdière
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Galactomannan detection in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Koen de Heer; Marije G Gerritsen; Caroline E Visser; Mariska Mg Leeflang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  Importance of operational factors in the reproducibility of Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immune assay.

Authors:  Nicolas Guigue; Samuel Lardeux; Alexandre Alanio; Samia Hamane; Marc Tabouret; Stéphane Bretagne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.