Literature DB >> 24850871

Single-step enrichment by Ti4+-IMAC and label-free quantitation enables in-depth monitoring of phosphorylation dynamics with high reproducibility and temporal resolution.

Erik L de Graaf1, Piero Giansanti1, A F Maarten Altelaar2, Albert J R Heck2.   

Abstract

Quantitative phosphoproteomics workflows traditionally involve additional sample labeling and fractionation steps for accurate and in-depth analysis. Here we report a high-throughput, straightforward, and comprehensive label-free phosphoproteomics approach using the highly selective, reproducible, and sensitive Ti(4+)-IMAC phosphopeptide enrichment method. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach by monitoring the phosphoproteome dynamics of Jurkat T cells stimulated by prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) over six different time points, measuring in total 108 snapshots of the phosphoproteome. In total, we quantitatively monitored 12,799 unique phosphosites over all time points with very high quantitative reproducibility (average r > 0.9 over 100 measurements and a median cv < 0.2). PGE2 is known to increase cellular cAMP levels, thereby activating PKA. The in-depth analysis revealed temporal regulation of a wide variety of phosphosites associated not only with PKA, but also with a variety of other classes of kinases. Following PGE2 stimulation, several pathways became only transiently activated, revealing that in-depth dynamic profiling requires techniques with high temporal resolution. Moreover, the large publicly available dataset provides a valuable resource for downstream PGE2 signaling dynamics in T cells, and cAMP-mediated signaling in particular. More generally, our method enables in-depth, quantitative, high-throughput phosphoproteome screening on any system, requiring very little sample, sample preparation, and analysis time.
© 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24850871      PMCID: PMC4159659          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O113.036608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  34 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Improved peptide identification by targeted fragmentation using CID, HCD and ETD on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos.

Authors:  Christian K Frese; A F Maarten Altelaar; Marco L Hennrich; Dirk Nolting; Martin Zeller; Jens Griep-Raming; Albert J R Heck; Shabaz Mohammed
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  GProX, a user-friendly platform for bioinformatics analysis and visualization of quantitative proteomics data.

Authors:  Kristoffer T G Rigbolt; Jens T Vanselow; Blagoy Blagoev
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  Regulation of immune responses by prostaglandin E2.

Authors:  Pawel Kalinski
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Enhancing the identification of phosphopeptides from putative basophilic kinase substrates using Ti (IV) based IMAC enrichment.

Authors:  Houjiang Zhou; Teck Y Low; Marco L Hennrich; Henk van der Toorn; Thomas Schwend; Hanfa Zou; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  BAD phosphorylation determines ovarian cancer chemosensitivity and patient survival.

Authors:  Douglas C Marchion; Hope M Cottrill; Yin Xiong; Ning Chen; Elona Bicaku; William J Fulp; Nisha Bansal; Hye Sook Chon; Xiaomang B Stickles; Siddharth G Kamath; Ardeshir Hakam; Lihua Li; Dan Su; Carolina Moreno; Patricia L Judson; Andrew Berchuck; Robert M Wenham; Sachin M Apte; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet; Gregory C Bloom; Steven A Eschrich; Said Sebti; Dung-Tsa Chen; Johnathan M Lancaster
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Rapid and reproducible single-stage phosphopeptide enrichment of complex peptide mixtures: application to general and phosphotyrosine-specific phosphoproteomics experiments.

Authors:  Arminja N Kettenbach; Scott A Gerber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse.

Authors:  Peter V Hornbeck; Jon M Kornhauser; Sasha Tkachev; Bin Zhang; Elzbieta Skrzypek; Beth Murray; Vaughan Latham; Michael Sullivan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Characterization of a TiO₂ enrichment method for label-free quantitative phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Alex Montoya; Luisa Beltran; Pedro Casado; Juan-Carlos Rodríguez-Prados; Pedro R Cutillas
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.608

View more
  37 in total

1.  Phosphoproteomics takes it easy.

Authors:  Paola Picotti
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  High-throughput phosphoproteomics reveals in vivo insulin signaling dynamics.

Authors:  Sean J Humphrey; S Babak Azimifar; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Systems-level Analysis Reveals Multiple Modulators of Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition and Identifies DNAJB4 and CD81 as Novel Metastasis Inducers in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zeynep Cansu Uretmen Kagiali; Erdem Sanal; Özge Karayel; Ayse Nur Polat; Özge Saatci; Pelin Gülizar Ersan; Kathrin Trappe; Bernhard Y Renard; Tamer T Önder; Nurcan Tuncbag; Özgür Şahin; Nurhan Ozlu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Phosphoproteomic analysis of protease-activated receptor-1 biased signaling reveals unique modulators of endothelial barrier function.

Authors:  Ying Lin; Jacob M Wozniak; Neil J Grimsey; Sravan Girada; Anand Patwardhan; Olivia Molinar-Inglis; Thomas H Smith; John D Lapek; David J Gonzalez; JoAnn Trejo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Analyses of PDE-regulated phosphoproteomes reveal unique and specific cAMP-signaling modules in T cells.

Authors:  Michael-Claude G Beltejar; Ho-Tak Lau; Martin G Golkowski; Shao-En Ong; Joseph A Beavo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ultra-deep tyrosine phosphoproteomics enabled by a phosphotyrosine superbinder.

Authors:  Yangyang Bian; Lei Li; Mingming Dong; Xuguang Liu; Tomonori Kaneko; Kai Cheng; Huadong Liu; Courtney Voss; Xuan Cao; Yan Wang; David Litchfield; Mingliang Ye; Shawn S-C Li; Hanfa Zou
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  CTGF/VEGFA-activated Fibroblasts Promote Tumor Migration Through Micro-environmental Modulation.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Esther A Zaal; Celia R Berkers; Simone Lemeer; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  The current state of the art of quantitative phosphoproteomics and its applications to diabetes research.

Authors:  Chi Yuet X'avia Chan; Marina A Gritsenko; Richard D Smith; Wei-Jun Qian
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.940

9.  Quantitative Profiling of Post-translational Modifications by Immunoaffinity Enrichment and LC-MS/MS in Cancer Serum without Immunodepletion.

Authors:  Hongbo Gu; Jian Min Ren; Xiaoying Jia; Tyler Levy; Klarisa Rikova; Vicky Yang; Kimberly A Lee; Matthew P Stokes; Jeffrey C Silva
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  193 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry for Phosphopeptide Characterization in the Positive and Negative Ion Modes.

Authors:  Michelle R Robinson; Juliana M Taliaferro; Kevin N Dalby; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.