Literature DB >> 24850283

A review of evidence-based practices for management of the second stage of labor.

Mary Lou Kopas.   

Abstract

Management of the second stage of labor often follows tradition-based routines rather than evidence-based practices. This review of second-stage labor care practices discusses risk factors for perineal trauma and prolonged second stage and scrutinizes a variety of care practices including positions, styles of pushing, use of epidural analgesia, and perineal support techniques. Current evidence for management of the second stage of labor supports the practices of delayed pushing, spontaneous (nondirected) pushing, and maternal choice of positions. Perineal compresses, perineal massage with a lubricant, and controlling the rate of fetal extension during crowning may prevent severe perineal trauma at birth. Supine positioning is not recommended. Upright positions and directed pushing can shorten the time from onset of second stage to birth and may be indicated in certain situations, although directed pushing has some associated risks. If the fetus is in the occiput posterior position, immediate pushing is not recommended, and manual rotation can be effective in correcting the malposition. Women should be informed of the potential effects of epidural analgesia on labor progress. Consultation and intervention to expedite birth may be indicated when birth is not imminent after 2 hours of active pushing, or 4 hours complete dilatation, for nulliparous women; or one hour of pushing, or 2 hours complete dilatation, for multiparous women. Each woman should be individually assessed and apprised of the potential risks to her and her fetus of a prolonged second stage of labor, and some women may choose to continue pushing beyond these time limits.
© 2014 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth; childbirth; review; second stage labor

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24850283     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  9 in total

Review 1.  Active agents, biomaterials, and technologies to improve biolubrication and strengthen soft tissues.

Authors:  Benjamin G Cooper; Ara Nazarian; Brian D Snyder; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  A Quality Improvement Project Utilizing a Clinical Practice Guideline in Women During Second-Stage Labor.

Authors:  Renece Waller-Wise; Stephanie Lewis; Barbara Williams
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  Spontaneous Perineal Trauma during Non-Operative Childbirth-Retrospective Analysis of Perineal Laceration Risk Factors.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Ewa Rzońca; Dorota Sys; Sylwia Rychlewicz; Anna Durka; Patryk Rzońca; Agnieszka Bień
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Epidemiology of unplanned out-of-hospital births attended by paramedics.

Authors:  Gayle McLelland; Lisa McKenna; Amee Morgans; Karen Smith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Yu Zang; Li-Hua Ren; Feng-Juan Li; Hong Lu
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-06-20

6.  One Plus One Equals Two-will that do? A trial protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a clinical practice to reduce severe perineal trauma {1}.

Authors:  M Edqvist; H G Dahlen; C Häggsgård; H Tern; K Ängeby; G Tegerstedt; P Teleman; G Ajne; C Rubertsson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Self-compassion and professional quality of life among midwives and nurse assistants: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karin Ängeby; Christine Rubertsson; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Malin Edqvist
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-07-29

8.  Factors Associated With Normal Physiologic Birth for Women Who Labor In Water: A Secondary Analysis of A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Jane Carpenter; Ethel Burns; Lesley Smith
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Factors hindering midwives' utilisation of alternative birth positions during labour in a selected public hospital.

Authors:  Maurine R Musie; Mmapheko D Peu; Varshika Bhana-Pema
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2019-09-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.