Literature DB >> 24850090

Impact of a Permission to Contact (PTC) platform on biobank enrollment and efficiency.

Jodi LeBlanc1, Simon Dee, Lauren Braun, Helena Daudt, Stefanie Cheah, Peter H Watson.   

Abstract

The consent process involves three steps; referral for contact, preliminary interview, and informed consent discussion. We propose that the efficiency and frequency of the consent process for individual biobank related projects increases when the referral for contact is conducted by an independent "Permission to Contact" (PTC) platform within a health research organization. A PTC platform established at our center in 2007 obtains "permission to be contacted about future cancer research" from approximately 1200 patients annually. With ethics board approval, the British Columbia (BC) Cancer Agency's Tumour Tissue Repository (TTR) deployed a post-procedure consent protocol designed to obtain initial referrals from the PTC platform. This protocol was initially deployed for breast and gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients (48% of patients), and later expanded as an option for all patients. We examined the impact on biobank accrual over a 4-year period spanning implementation of the post-procedure protocol. Within the first 2 years, while deploying an existing pre-procedure consent protocol, the TTR received, on average, 38.5 referrals/month, and consented 36.5 patients/month. Over the next 24 months, referral and consent rates increased to 68.5/month and 45.6/month, respectively, while operating both pre-procedure and post-procedure protocols. This represents a significant increase in overall referrals (1.78 fold) and consented patients (1.25 fold). For breast and GI cancer patients, referrals and consents, increased even further (2.4 and 1.6 fold, respectively). Overall, the consented/declined/unknown decision rates in the first period were 95.3%/1.2%/3.5% (n=918 approached patients), while rates in the second period were 86%/2.3%/11.7% (n=1272 approached patients). Overall, consent process costs fell by 14% per case. Patient engagement can be positively influenced by connecting a biobank with a PTC platform enhancing efficiency in obtaining consent, which is a key determinant of tumor biobank costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24850090     DOI: 10.1089/bio.2013.0004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  7 in total

1.  A framework for biobank sustainability.

Authors:  Peter H Watson; Sara Y Nussbeck; Candace Carter; Sheila O'Donoghue; Stefanie Cheah; Lise A M Matzke; Rebecca O Barnes; John Bartlett; Jane Carpenter; William E Grizzle; Randal N Johnston; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Leigh Murphy; Katherine Sexton; Lois Shepherd; Daniel Simeon-Dubach; Nikolajs Zeps; Brent Schacter
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Felicity Callard; Matthew Broadbent; Mike Denis; Matthew Hotopf; Murat Soncul; Til Wykes; Simon Lovestone; Robert Stewart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A consumer register: an acceptable and cost-effective alternative for accessing patient populations.

Authors:  Jamie Bryant; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Elizabeth Fradgley; Breanne Hobden; Alison Zucca; Frans Henskens; Andrew Searles; Brad Webb; Christopher Oldmeadow
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  A population-based approach for implementing change from opt-out to opt-in research permissions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Marshall; Jim C Oates; Azza Shoaibi; Jihad S Obeid; Melissa L Habrat; Robert W Warren; Kathleen T Brady; Leslie A Lenert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  What proportion of patients with psychosis is willing to take part in research? A mental health electronic case register analysis.

Authors:  Rashmi Patel; Sherifat Oduola; Felicity Callard; Til Wykes; Matthew Broadbent; Robert Stewart; Thomas K J Craig; Philip McGuire
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The association between method of solicitation and patient permissions for use of surplus tissues and contact for future research.

Authors:  Azza Shoaibi; Jihad S Obeid; Jim C Oates; Melissa L Habrat; Leslie A Lenert
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-09-24

7.  Evaluation of 3 approaches for increasing patient engagement in clinical research: Feedback from a community engagement advisory board.

Authors:  Alicia K Matthews; Kevin Rak; Emily Anderson; Amparo Castillo; Raymond Ruiz; Wendy Choure; Marilyn Willis
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-07-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.