Literature DB >> 24849839

Section 17. Laparoscopic and minimal incisional donor hepatectomy.

YoungRok Choi1, Nam-Joon Yi, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh.   

Abstract

Living donor hepatectomy is now a well-established surgical procedure. However, a large abdominal incision is still required, which results in a large permanent scar, especially for a right liver graft. This report reviews our techniques of minimally invasive or minimal incisional donor hepatectomy using a transverse incision.Twenty-five living donors underwent right hepatectomy with a transverse incision and 484 donors with a conventional incision between April 2007 and December 2012. Among the donors with a transverse incision, two cases were totally laparoscopic procedures using a hand-port device; 11 cases were laparoscopic-assisted hepatectomy (hybrid technique), and 14 cases were open procedures using a transverse incision without the aid of the laparoscopic technique. Currently, a hybrid method has been exclusively used because of the long operation time and surgical difficulty in totally laparoscopic hepatectomy and the exposure problems for the liver cephalic portion during the open technique using a transverse incision.All donors with a transverse incision were women except for one. Twenty-four of the grafts were right livers without middle hepatic vein (MHV) and one with MHV. The donors' mean BMI was 21.1 kg/m. The median operation time was 355 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 346.1±247.3 mL (range, 70-1200). There was no intraoperative transfusion. These donors had 29 cases of grade I [14 pleural effusions (56%), 11 abdominal fluid collections (44%), 3 atelectasis (12%), 1bile leak (4%)], 1 case of grade II (1 pneumothorax) and two cases of grade III complications; two interventions were needed because of abdominal fluid collections by Clavien-Dindo classification. Meanwhile, donors with a conventional big incision, which included the Mercedes-Benz incision or an inverted L-shaped incision, had 433 cases of grade I, 19 cases of grade II and 18 cases of grade III complications. However, the liver enzymes and total bilirubin of all donors were normalized within 1 month, and they recovered fully. Additionally, in a survey inquiring about cosmetic outcomes with a numeric scale of 1 through 10 (1, Not confident; 10, Very confident), the transverse incision had more satisfactory scores compared to the conventional big incision (9.80 vs. 6.17, P=0.001). In conclusion, the hybrid technique can be safely performed in donor right hepatectomy, with a minimal transverse skin incision, resulting in a good cosmetic outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24849839     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000446281.89546.f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open living donor hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuye Gao; Wu Wu; Chunyu Liu; Tao Liu; Heng Xiao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Live Liver Donors.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Chen Hu; Hua-Li Cao; Mang-Li Zhang; Song Ye; Shu-Sen Zheng; Wei-Lin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Different techniques for harvesting grafts for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Li; Jun-Bin Zhang; Xiao-Long Chen; Lei Fan; Li Wang; Shi-Hui Li; Qiao-Lan Zheng; Xiao-Ming Wang; Yang Yang; Gui-Hua Chen; Gen-Shu Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  The impact of mini-invasive right hepatectomy in the setting of living donation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Quirino Lai; Francesco Giovanardi; Gianluca Mennini; Giammauro Berardi; Massimo Rossi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.