Literature DB >> 24848060

Practical quantum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance.

Toshihiko Sasaki1, Yoshihisa Yamamoto2, Masato Koashi1.   

Abstract

Quantum cryptography exploits the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics to provide a secure way to exchange private information. Such an exchange requires a common random bit sequence, called a key, to be shared secretly between the sender and the receiver. The basic idea behind quantum key distribution (QKD) has widely been understood as the property that any attempt to distinguish encoded quantum states causes a disturbance in the signal. As a result, implementation of a QKD protocol involves an estimation of the experimental parameters influenced by the eavesdropper's intervention, which is achieved by randomly sampling the signal. If the estimation of many parameters with high precision is required, the portion of the signal that is sacrificed increases, thus decreasing the efficiency of the protocol. Here we propose a QKD protocol based on an entirely different principle. The sender encodes a bit sequence onto non-orthogonal quantum states and the receiver randomly dictates how a single bit should be calculated from the sequence. The eavesdropper, who is unable to learn the whole of the sequence, cannot guess the bit value correctly. An achievable rate of secure key distribution is calculated by considering complementary choices between quantum measurements of two conjugate observables. We found that a practical implementation using a laser pulse train achieves a key rate comparable to a decoy-state QKD protocol, an often-used technique for lasers. It also has a better tolerance of bit errors and of finite-sized-key effects. We anticipate that this finding will give new insight into how the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics can be related to secure communication, and will facilitate the simple and efficient use of conventional lasers for QKD.

Year:  2014        PMID: 24848060     DOI: 10.1038/nature13303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  14 in total

1.  Electrically driven single-photon source.

Authors:  Zhiliang Yuan; Beata E Kardynal; R Mark Stevenson; Andrew J Shields; Charlene J Lobo; Ken Cooper; Neil S Beattie; David A Ritchie; Michael Pepper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states.

Authors:  Frédéric Grosshans; Philippe Grangier
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication.

Authors:  Won-Young Hwang
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1992-05-25       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1991-08-05       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Decoy state quantum key distribution.

Authors:  Hoi-Kwong Lo; Xiongfeng Ma; Kai Chen
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography.

Authors:  Xiang-Bin Wang
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Quantum cryptography with coherent states.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.140

9.  On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability.

Authors:  Yu-Ming He; Yu He; Yu-Jia Wei; Dian Wu; Mete Atatüre; Christian Schneider; Sven Höfling; Martin Kamp; Chao-Yang Lu; Jian-Wei Pan
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography.

Authors:  Marco Tomamichel; Charles Ci Wen Lim; Nicolas Gisin; Renato Renner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  21 in total

1.  Fundamental rate-loss trade-off for the quantum internet.

Authors:  Koji Azuma; Akihiro Mizutani; Hoi-Kwong Lo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Mode-pairing quantum key distribution.

Authors:  Pei Zeng; Hongyi Zhou; Weijie Wu; Xiongfeng Ma
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.

Authors:  Ke Xue; Zhigang Shen; Shengmei Zhao; Qianping Mao
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 2.738

4.  Improved security bound for the round-robin-differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution.

Authors:  Zhen-Qiang Yin; Shuang Wang; Wei Chen; Yun-Guang Han; Rong Wang; Guang-Can Guo; Zheng-Fu Han
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  N-dimensional measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with N + 1 un-characterized sources: zero quantum-bit-error-rate case.

Authors:  Won-Young Hwang; Hong-Yi Su; Joonwoo Bae
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Practical Quantum Private Database Queries Based on Passive Round-Robin Differential Phase-shift Quantum Key Distribution.

Authors:  Jian Li; Yu-Guang Yang; Xiu-Bo Chen; Yi-Hua Zhou; Wei-Min Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Security of quantum key distribution with multiphoton components.

Authors:  Hua-Lei Yin; Yao Fu; Yingqiu Mao; Zeng-Bing Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution by controlling excess noise.

Authors:  Duan Huang; Peng Huang; Dakai Lin; Guihua Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Two-dimensional distributed-phase-reference protocol for quantum key distribution.

Authors:  Davide Bacco; Jesper Bjerge Christensen; Mario A Usuga Castaneda; Yunhong Ding; Søren Forchhammer; Karsten Rottwitt; Leif Katsuo Oxenløwe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances.

Authors:  Khabat Heshami; Duncan G England; Peter C Humphreys; Philip J Bustard; Victor M Acosta; Joshua Nunn; Benjamin J Sussman
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.