Literature DB >> 24847853

Human protein status modulates brain reward responses to food cues.

Sanne Griffioen-Roose1, Paul Am Smeets1, Emmy van den Heuvel1, Sanne Boesveldt1, Graham Finlayson1, Cees de Graaf1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protein is indispensable in the human diet, and its intake appears tightly regulated. The role of sensory attributes of foods in protein intake regulation is far from clear.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of human protein status on neural responses to different food cues with the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The food cues varied by taste category (sweet compared with savory) and protein content (low compared with high). In addition, food preferences and intakes were measured.
DESIGN: We used a randomized crossover design whereby 23 healthy women [mean ± SD age: 22 ± 2 y; mean ± SD body mass index (in kg/m(2)): 22.5 ± 1.8] followed two 16-d fully controlled dietary interventions involving consumption of either a low-protein diet (0.6 g protein · kg body weight(-1) · d(-1), ~7% of energy derived from protein, approximately half the normal protein intake) or a high-protein diet (2.2 g protein · kg body weight(-1) · d(-1), ~25% of energy, approximately twice the normal intake). On the last day of the interventions, blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses to odor and visual food cues were measured by using fMRI. The 2 interventions were followed by a 1-d ad libitum phase, during which a large array of food items was available and preference and intake were measured.
RESULTS: When exposed to food cues (relative to the control condition), the BOLD response was higher in reward-related areas (orbitofrontal cortex, striatum) in a low-protein state than in a high-protein state. Specifically, BOLD was higher in the inferior orbitofrontal cortex in response to savory food cues. In contrast, the protein content of the food cues did not modulate the BOLD response. A low protein state also increased preferences for savory food cues and increased protein intake in the ad libitum phase as compared with a high-protein state.
CONCLUSIONS: Protein status modulates brain responses in reward regions to savory food cues. These novel findings suggest that dietary protein status affects taste category preferences, which could play an important role in the regulation of protein intake in humans. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3288 as NTR3288.
© 2014 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24847853     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.079392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  16 in total

Review 1.  The Macronutrients, Appetite, and Energy Intake.

Authors:  Alicia L Carreiro; Jaapna Dhillon; Susannah Gordon; Kelly A Higgins; Ashley G Jacobs; Breanna M McArthur; Benjamin W Redan; Rebecca L Rivera; Leigh R Schmidt; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Severity of olfactory deficits is reflected in functional brain networks-An fMRI study.

Authors:  Johanna L Reichert; Elbrich M Postma; Paul A M Smeets; Wilbert M Boek; Kees de Graaf; Veronika Schöpf; Sanne Boesveldt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Protein-dependent regulation of feeding and metabolism.

Authors:  Christopher D Morrison; Thomas Laeger
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 12.015

4.  The neuronal logic of how internal states control food choice.

Authors:  Daniel Münch; Dennis Goldschmidt; Carlos Ribeiro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 5.  Low Protein Diets and Energy Balance: Mechanisms of Action on Energy Intake and Expenditure.

Authors:  Adel Pezeshki; Prasanth K Chelikani
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Raised FGF-21 and Triglycerides Accompany Increased Energy Intake Driven by Protein Leverage in Lean, Healthy Individuals: A Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Alison K Gosby; Namson S Lau; Charmaine S Tam; Miguel A Iglesias; Christopher D Morrison; Ian D Caterson; Jennie Brand-Miller; Arthur D Conigrave; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gray matter alterations and correlation of nutritional intake with the gray matter volume in prediabetes.

Authors:  Yi-Cheng Hou; Chien-Han Lai; Yu-Te Wu; Shwu-Huey Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Low protein diets produce divergent effects on energy balance.

Authors:  Adel Pezeshki; Rizaldy C Zapata; Arashdeep Singh; Nicholas J Yee; Prasanth K Chelikani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Impact of Dietary Protein and Gender on Food Reinforcement.

Authors:  Shanon L Casperson; James N Roemmich
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Protein for Life: Review of Optimal Protein Intake, Sustainable Dietary Sources and the Effect on Appetite in Ageing Adults.

Authors:  Marta Lonnie; Emma Hooker; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Bernard M Corfe; Mark A Green; Anthony W Watson; Elizabeth A Williams; Emma J Stevenson; Simon Penson; Alexandra M Johnstone
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.