BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare socioeconomic characteristics of the Roma population living in Roma settlements with the majority population. Moreover, it was aimed to assess socioeconomic differences in health and health-related behaviour within the population living in Roma settlements. METHODS: Data from the cross-sectional HepaMeta study conducted in Slovakia in 2011 were used. The sample consisted of 452 Roma (mean age = 34.7; 35.2% men) and 403 non-Roma (mean age = 33.5; 45.9% men) respondents. Roma in selected settlements were recruited by local Roma community workers. Respondents from the major population were randomly selected from a list of patients from general practitioners. Data were collected via questionnaire, anthropometric measures and analysed blood samples. Differences in socioeconomic characteristics between the population living in Roma settlements and the majority population were tested using the chi-square test. The contribution of selected socioeconomic characteristics on health and health-related behaviour of the population living in Roma settlements was assessed by logistic regression models adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: The population living in Roma settlements is characterised by significantly lower socioeconomic standards, and the living conditions are significantly worse compared with the majority. With few exceptions, the study did not confirm any significant association between socioeconomic indicators and health and health-related behaviour within the population living in Roma settlements. CONCLUSIONS: The deteriorating effect of living in Roma settlement on health and health-related behaviour seems to be immense regardless differences in socioeconomic characteristics or living condition within the settlement population.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare socioeconomic characteristics of the Roma population living in Roma settlements with the majority population. Moreover, it was aimed to assess socioeconomic differences in health and health-related behaviour within the population living in Roma settlements. METHODS: Data from the cross-sectional HepaMeta study conducted in Slovakia in 2011 were used. The sample consisted of 452 Roma (mean age = 34.7; 35.2% men) and 403 non-Roma (mean age = 33.5; 45.9% men) respondents. Roma in selected settlements were recruited by local Roma community workers. Respondents from the major population were randomly selected from a list of patients from general practitioners. Data were collected via questionnaire, anthropometric measures and analysed blood samples. Differences in socioeconomic characteristics between the population living in Roma settlements and the majority population were tested using the chi-square test. The contribution of selected socioeconomic characteristics on health and health-related behaviour of the population living in Roma settlements was assessed by logistic regression models adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: The population living in Roma settlements is characterised by significantly lower socioeconomic standards, and the living conditions are significantly worse compared with the majority. With few exceptions, the study did not confirm any significant association between socioeconomic indicators and health and health-related behaviour within the population living in Roma settlements. CONCLUSIONS: The deteriorating effect of living in Roma settlement on health and health-related behaviour seems to be immense regardless differences in socioeconomic characteristics or living condition within the settlement population.
Authors: Todd A Jusko; Marina Oktapodas; L'ubica Palkovičová Murinová; Katarina Babinská; Jana Babjaková; Marc-André Verner; Jamie C DeWitt; Kelly Thevenet-Morrison; Kamil Čonka; Beata Drobná; Jana Chovancová; Sally W Thurston; B Paige Lawrence; Ann M Dozier; Kirsi M Järvinen; Henrieta Patayová; Tomáš Trnovec; Juliette Legler; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Marja H Lamoree Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Sylvia Drazilova; Martin Janicko; Pavol Kristian; Ivan Schreter; Branislav Kucinsky; Marek Kozlej; Ivana Hockickova; Peter Jarcuska Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: Andrej Belak; Andrea Madarasova Geckova; Jitse P van Dijk; Sijmen A Reijneveld Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Daniel La Parra-Casado; Paola A Mosquera; Carmen Vives-Cases; Miguel San Sebastian Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sylvia Drazilova; Martin Janicko; Pavol Kristian; Ivan Schreter; Monika Halanova; Ingrid Urbancikova; Andrea Madarasova-Geckova; Maria Marekova; Daniel Pella; Peter Jarcuska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ingrid Babinská; Monika Halánová; Zuzana Kalinová; Lenka Čechová; Lýdia Čisláková; Andrea Madarasová Gecková Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lenka Sedova; Valerie Tothova; Dita Novakova; Vera Olisarova; Sylva Bartlova; Frantisek Dolak; Alena Kajanova; Radka Prokesova; Vera Adamkova Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Monika Halánová; Eduard Veseliny; Zuzana Kalinová; Peter Jarčuška; Martin Janičko; Ingrid Urbančíková; Daniel Pella; Sylvia Dražilová; Ingrid Babinská Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andrej Belak; Andrea Madarasova Geckova; Jitse P van Dijk; Sijmen A Reijneveld Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 3.380