Literature DB >> 24846933

Practice of bridging anticoagulation: guideline adherence and risk factors for bleeding.

P Eijgenraam1, H ten Cate, A J ten Cate-Hoek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perioperative bridging with low-molecularweight heparins (LMWH) is applied to minimise the risk of thromboembolism (TE). Guidelines characterise patients at risk and strategies to be followed. We assessed guideline adherence in bridging episodes and identified possible risk factors for bleeding in a retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: We searched the electronic patient data system of the Maastricht anticoagulation service, the Netherlands. We identified 181 patients on chronic anticoagulation who underwent surgery (222 procedures) and were bridged with LMWH. Guideline adherence was defined in terms of the relation between TE risk and the dose of LMWH administered, the bleeding risk of the procedure and the duration of postprocedural administration of LMWH. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for bleeding.
RESULTS: Of all low TE risk patients (n=102), 84.3% were treated with therapeutic doses of LMWH. The median duration of postprocedural LMWH administration was eight days. The 30-day incidence of major bleeding in the entire group (n=222) was 11.3%. Two patients (0.90%) experienced a deep venous thrombosis. Creatinine clearance ≤40 ml/min (odds ratio (OR) 5.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 20.26) and dental procedures (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.22 to 9.04) were independent predictors for total bleeding.
CONCLUSION: Guideline adherence was low, leading to prolonged bridging procedures, excess treatment of patients and high bleeding rates. The majority of patients had a low thromboembolic risk profile or underwent low-risk procedures. For patients with decreased creatinine clearance, reduced doses of LMWH should be considered to reduce bleeding risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24846933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth J Med        ISSN: 0300-2977            Impact factor:   1.422


  6 in total

1. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 2.  Safety of Anticoagulation Interruption in Patients Undergoing Surgery or Invasive Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials and Non-randomized Studies.

Authors:  Frédérique Hovaguimian; Sabrina Köppel; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Management of venous thromboembolism with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants: A review for nurse practitioners and pharmacists.

Authors:  Michelle Schmerge; Sally Earl; Carol Kline
Journal:  J Am Assoc Nurse Pract       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.165

4.  How reliable is perioperative anticoagulant management? Determining guideline compliance and practice variation by a retrospective patient record review.

Authors:  Marco J Moesker; Janke F de Groot; Nikki L Damen; Menno V Huisman; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Guideline compliance for bridging anticoagulation use in vitamin-K antagonist patients; practice variation and factors associated with non-compliance.

Authors:  M J Moesker; J F de Groot; N L Damen; N R Bijsterveld; J W R Twisk; M V Huisman; M C de Bruijne; C Wagner
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2019-08-05

6.  Bridging therapy for oral anticoagulation increases the risk for bleeding-related complications in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martijn Haighton; Diederik H R Kempen; Nienke Wolterbeek; Louis N Marting; Martijn van Dijk; Remmelt M R Veen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.