Literature DB >> 24846414

Effects of anodal TDCS stimulation of left parietal cortex on visual spatial attention tasks in men and women across menstrual cycle.

M de Tommaso1, S Invitto2, K Ricci3, V Lucchese3, M Delussi2, P Quattromini4, S Bettocchi4, V Pinto5, G Lancioni2, P Livrea5, E Cicinelli4.   

Abstract

Sex hormonal variations have been shown to affect functional cerebral asymmetries in cognitive domains, contributing to sex-related differences in functional cerebral organization. The aim of this study was to investigate spatial attention by means of a bisection line test and computer-supported attention task during the menstrual cycle in healthy women compared to men, in basal condition and under Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) of the left parietal cortex. Women were studied during the menses, follicular and luteal phases, ascertained by transvaginal ultrasounds. In basal conditions, women showed a clear deviation toward the right in the bisection line test during the menstrual phase, similarly to men. The midpoint recognition in the computer-supported attention task was not influenced by the menstrual cycle for women, while men showed a significant increase in errors toward the left side. The anodal activation of the left parietal cortex did not affect the line bisection task, while in men it reduced the total amount of errors in midpoint recognition observed in the computer supported attention task. The hand-use effect demonstrated by the bisection-line test could be influenced by estrogen fluctuations, while the right hemisphere prevalence in spatial attention appears to be gender-related and scarcely influenced by the menstrual cycle. The left parietal cortex seems to exert a scarce effect on hand-use effect, while its activation is able to revert sex related right hemisphere supremacy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Functional cerebral asymmetry; Gender; Hormonal fluctuations; TDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24846414     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  11 in total

1.  Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Simon J Vogrin; Olivia Carter; Mark J Cook; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Alicia M Goodwill; Beth Ann O'Brien; Brenda Rapp; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.184

3.  Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Tim Hagenacker; Vera Bude; Steffen Naegel; Dagny Holle; Zaza Katsarava; Hans-Christoph Diener; Mark Obermann
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 7.277

4.  Gender differences in cognitive Theory of Mind revealed by transcranial direct current stimulation on medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Mauro Adenzato; Michela Brambilla; Rosa Manenti; Lucia De Lucia; Luigi Trojano; Sara Garofalo; Ivan Enrici; Maria Cotelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex dampens mind-wandering in men.

Authors:  Elena Bertossi; Ludovica Peccenini; Andrea Solmi; Alessio Avenanti; Elisa Ciaramelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Imaging Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) with Positron Emission Tomography (PET).

Authors:  Thorsten Rudroff; Craig D Workman; Alexandra C Fietsam; Laura L Boles Ponto
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-15

7.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at 4 mA Induces Greater Leg Muscle Fatigability in Women Compared to Men.

Authors:  Craig D Workman; Alexandra C Fietsam; Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-21

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Muscle Strength of Non-dominant Knee in Healthy Young Males.

Authors:  Panpan Lu; Nicholas J Hanson; Lin Wen; Feng Guo; Xiaoyu Tian
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in behavioral and food addiction: a systematic review of efficacy, technical, and methodological issues.

Authors:  Anne Sauvaget; Benoît Trojak; Samuel Bulteau; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Fernando Fernández-Aranda; Ines Wolz; José M Menchón; Sophia Achab; Jean-Marie Vanelle; Marie Grall-Bronnec
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Modulating Spatial Processes and Navigation via Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.