Literature DB >> 24846304

Are religiously affiliated hospitals more than just nonprofits? A study on stereotypical patient perceptions and preferences.

Ann-Kathrin Seemann1, Florian Drevs, Christoph Gebele, Dieter K Tscheulin.   

Abstract

Recent research on patients' perceptions of different hospitals predominantly concentrates on whether hospitals are nonprofit or for-profit. Nonprofit hospitals can be subdivided into hospitals that are affiliated with a religious denomination and those that are not. Referring to the stereotypic content model, this study analyzes patients' perceptions of religious hospitals based on the factors of warmth, competence, trustworthiness and Christianity. Using a survey of German citizens (N = 300) with a one-factorial between-subject design (for-profit vs. nonprofit vs. religious nonprofit), we found that religious affiliation increases the perceptions of hospitals' trustworthiness and attractiveness. The study indicated that patients' perceptions of nonprofit hospitals with a religious affiliation differ from patients' beliefs about nonprofit hospitals without a religious affiliation, implying that research into ownership-related differences must account for hospital subtypes. Furthermore, religious hospitals that communicate their ownership status may have competitive advantages over those with a different ownership status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24846304     DOI: 10.1007/s10943-014-9880-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Relig Health        ISSN: 0022-4197


  29 in total

1.  African-American participation in clinical trials: situating trust and trustworthiness.

Authors:  L M Crawley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske; Amy J C Cuddy; Peter Glick; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

3.  Surveys of patient satisfaction: II--Designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11

4.  Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.

Authors:  Charles M Judd; Laurie James-Hawkins; Vincent Yzerbyt; Yoshihisa Kashima
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation.

Authors:  E Babakus; W G Mangold
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

7.  Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports.

Authors:  D B Mukamel; A I Mushlin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Does quality influence choice of hospital?

Authors:  H S Luft; D W Garnick; D H Mark; D J Peltzman; C S Phibbs; E Lichtenberg; S J McPhee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Religious hospitals and primary care physicians: conflicts over policies for patient care.

Authors:  Debra B Stulberg; Ryan E Lawrence; Jason Shattuck; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Religion, spirituality and health care treatment decisions: the role of chaplains in the Australian clinical context.

Authors:  Lindsay B Carey; Jeffrey Cohen
Journal:  J Health Care Chaplain       Date:  2008
View more
  1 in total

1.  Separate but Related: Dimensions of Healthcare Provider Social Support in Day-Treatment Oncology Units.

Authors:  Manuela Tomai; Marco Lauriola
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.