Literature DB >> 24846289

Predicting the lateral direction of deceptive and non-deceptive penalty kicks in football from the kinematics of the kicker.

José E Lopes1, David M Jacobs2, David Travieso3, Duarte Araújo4.   

Abstract

This study addresses the utility of the kinematics of penalty takers for goalkeepers in association football. Twelve professional and semi-professional players shot to one side of the goal with (deceptive condition) or without (non-deceptive condition) simulating a shot to the opposite side. The body kinematics of the penalty takers were registered with motion-capture apparatus. Correlation and regression techniques were used to determine the relation between the shot direction and aspects of the penalty taker's kinematics at different moments. Several kinematic variables were strongly correlated with shot direction, especially those related to the lower part of the body. Some of these variables, including the angle of the non-kicking foot, acquired high correlations at time intervals that are useful to goalkeepers. Compound variables, here defined as linear combinations of variables, were found to be more useful than locally defined variables. Whereas some kinematic variables showed substantial differences in their relation to ball direction depending on deception, other kinematic variables were less affected by deception. Results are interpreted with the hypothesis of non-substitutability of genuine action. The study can also be interpreted as extending the correlation and regression methodology, often used to analyze variables defined at single moments, to the analysis of variables in a time continuous fashion.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Anticipation; Deception; Movement; Representative design; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24846289     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  7 in total

1.  Expertise differences in anticipatory judgements during a temporally and spatially occluded task.

Authors:  Joe Causer; Nicholas J Smeeton; A Mark Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Effect of Blurred Perceptual Training on the Decision Making of Skilled Football Referees.

Authors:  Tammie van Biemen; J Koedijker; Peter G Renden; David L Mann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-27

3.  Stepovers and Signal Detection: Response Sensitivity and Bias in the Differentiation of Genuine and Deceptive Football Actions.

Authors:  Robin C Jackson; Hayley Barton; Kelly J Ashford; Bruce Abernethy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

4.  Detection of deceptive motions in rugby from visual motion cues.

Authors:  Sean Dean Lynch; Anne-Hélène Olivier; Benoit Bideau; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Extending Research on Deception in Sport - Combining Perception and Kinematic Approaches.

Authors:  Josefine Panten; Florian Loffing; Joseph Baker; Jörg Schorer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-28

6.  Maximising Grip on Deception and Disguise: Expert Sports Performance During Competitive Interactions.

Authors:  Harry Ramsey; Matt Dicks; Lorraine Hope; Vasu Reddy
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 7.  How Enaction and Ecological Approaches Can Contribute to Sports and Skill Learning.

Authors:  Carlos Avilés; José A Navia; Luis-Miguel Ruiz-Pérez; Jorge A Zapatero-Ayuso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.