Melissa A Wilk1, John T McAllister2, Robert F Cooper3, Adam M Dubis4, Teresa N Patitucci1, Phyllis Summerfelt2, Jennifer L Anderson5, Kimberly E Stepien2, Deborah M Costakos2, Thomas B Connor2, William J Wirostko2, Pei-Wen Chiang6, Alfredo Dubra7, Christine A Curcio8, Murray H Brilliant9, C Gail Summers10, Joseph Carroll11. 1. Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. 4. Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom. 5. Core Laboratory, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States. 6. Casey Eye Institute Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Portland, Oregon, United States. 7. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. 8. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States. 9. Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States. 10. Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences and Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States. 11. Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Albinism is associated with disrupted foveal development, though intersubject variability is becoming appreciated. We sought to quantify this variability, and examine the relationship between foveal cone specialization and pit morphology in patients with a clinical diagnosis of albinism. METHODS: We recruited 32 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of albinism. DNA was obtained from 25 subjects, and known albinism genes were analyzed for mutations. Relative inner and outer segment (IS and OS) lengthening (fovea-to-perifovea ratio) was determined from manually segmented spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) B-scans. Foveal pit morphology was quantified for eight subjects from macular SD-OCT volumes. Ten subjects underwent imaging with adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO), and cone density was measured. RESULTS: We found mutations in 22 of 25 subjects, including five novel mutations. All subjects lacked complete excavation of inner retinal layers at the fovea, though four subjects had foveal pits with normal diameter and/or volume. Peak cone density and OS lengthening were variable and overlapped with that observed in normal controls. A fifth hyper-reflective band was observed in the outer retina on SD-OCT in the majority of the subjects with albinism. CONCLUSIONS: Foveal cone specialization and pit morphology vary greatly in albinism. Normal cone packing was observed in the absence of a foveal pit, suggesting a pit is not required for packing to occur. The degree to which retinal anatomy correlates with genotype or visual function remains unclear, and future examination of larger patient groups will provide important insight on this issue. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
PURPOSE: Albinism is associated with disrupted foveal development, though intersubject variability is becoming appreciated. We sought to quantify this variability, and examine the relationship between foveal cone specialization and pit morphology in patients with a clinical diagnosis of albinism. METHODS: We recruited 32 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of albinism. DNA was obtained from 25 subjects, and known albinism genes were analyzed for mutations. Relative inner and outer segment (IS and OS) lengthening (fovea-to-perifovea ratio) was determined from manually segmented spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) B-scans. Foveal pit morphology was quantified for eight subjects from macular SD-OCT volumes. Ten subjects underwent imaging with adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO), and cone density was measured. RESULTS: We found mutations in 22 of 25 subjects, including five novel mutations. All subjects lacked complete excavation of inner retinal layers at the fovea, though four subjects had foveal pits with normal diameter and/or volume. Peak cone density and OS lengthening were variable and overlapped with that observed in normal controls. A fifth hyper-reflective band was observed in the outer retina on SD-OCT in the majority of the subjects with albinism. CONCLUSIONS: Foveal cone specialization and pit morphology vary greatly in albinism. Normal cone packing was observed in the absence of a foveal pit, suggesting a pit is not required for packing to occur. The degree to which retinal anatomy correlates with genotype or visual function remains unclear, and future examination of larger patient groups will provide important insight on this issue. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Authors: J M Newton; O Cohen-Barak; N Hagiwara; J M Gardner; M T Davisson; R A King; M H Brilliant Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-09-26 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: John T McAllister; Adam M Dubis; Diane M Tait; Shawn Ostler; Jungtae Rha; Kimberly E Stepien; C Gail Summers; Joseph Carroll Journal: Vision Res Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Je Hyun Seo; Young Suk Yu; Jeong Hun Kim; Ho Kyung Choung; Jang Won Heo; Seong-Joon Kim Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Robert F Cooper; Adam M Dubis; Ashavini Pavaskar; Jungtae Rha; Alfredo Dubra; Joseph Carroll Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Hilde R Pedersen; Maureen Neitz; Stuart J Gilson; Erlend C S Landsend; Øygunn Aas Utheim; Tor Paaske Utheim; Rigmor C Baraas Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-02-05
Authors: Ravi S Jonnal; Omer P Kocaoglu; Robert J Zawadzki; Sang-Hyuck Lee; John S Werner; Donald T Miller Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Douglas H Ross; Mark E Clark; Pooja Godara; Carrie Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Cynthia Owsley; Katie M Litts; Richard F Spaide; Kenneth R Sloan; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Melissa A Wilk; Brandon M Wilk; Christopher S Langlo; Robert F Cooper; Joseph Carroll Journal: Vision Res Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Zhaohui Hu; Kai Wang; Morgan Bertsch; Taylor Dunn; Taylor Kehoe; Andrew D Kemerley; Megan Helms; Sajag Bhattarai; Wanda Pfeifer; Todd E Scheetz; Arlene V Drack Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: HaeWon Jung; Jianfei Liu; Tao Liu; Aman George; Margery G Smelkinson; Sarah Cohen; Ruchi Sharma; Owen Schwartz; Arvydas Maminishkis; Kapil Bharti; Catherine Cukras; Laryssa A Huryn; Brian P Brooks; Robert Fariss; Johnny Tam Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-03-21
Authors: Melissa A Wilk; Alfredo Dubra; Christine A Curcio; Murray H Brilliant; C Gail Summers; Joseph Carroll Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 4.799