Literature DB >> 24845592

Permission to contact (PTC)--a strategy to enhance patient engagement in translational research.

Stefanie Cheah1, Sheila O'Donoghue, Helena Daudt, Simon Dee, Jodi LeBlanc, Lauren Braun, Rebecca Barnes, Suzanne Vercauteren, Robert H Boone, Peter H Watson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Improving patient recruitment and consent to participate in clinical studies is an important issue. The process of consent involves three steps: patient referral for contact, the preliminary interview to determine patient interest, and the informed consent discussion. We hypothesized that putting the first step of the consent process into a 'Permission to Contact' (PTC) platform would improve patient engagement, would improve the efficiency of the other steps of the process, and would be acceptable to diverse patient groups.
METHODS: To test this hypothesis, four PTC platforms were established in three types of outpatient health clinics (cancer, cardiac, maternal health) in different British Columbia health centers. Each began as a research project where clinic personnel were engaged, clinic flow processes were mapped, and a design for each PTC was derived by consensus. All patients at these clinics were asked for 'permission to be contacted for future research purposes.' Patient approach and permission response rates were assessed and operational costs were estimated.
RESULTS: Overall permission rates were high for all projects, but ranged from 94% of 'cancer' patients to 80% of 'congenital heart' patients who were approached (p<0.0001). Sustainability was demonstrated by stable enrollment levels after several years, and ongoing costs averaged $25 (range $12-$39) for each 'permission' across all four platforms.
CONCLUSIONS: A PTC platform is a feasible mechanism to engage patients in research programs such as biobanking. It is well supported by clinic staff and receives high engagement and acceptance from patients. Patient-approach rates vary in different clinics, likely due to both clinic and PTC process factors, but this strategy provides an efficient means of engaging patients in research and sets the stage for enhanced enrollment into translational research programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24845592     DOI: 10.1089/bio.2013.0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  14 in total

1.  Ethical considerations in biobanks: how a public health ethics perspective sheds new light on old controversies.

Authors:  Alice Hawkins Virani; Holly Longstaff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A framework for biobank sustainability.

Authors:  Peter H Watson; Sara Y Nussbeck; Candace Carter; Sheila O'Donoghue; Stefanie Cheah; Lise A M Matzke; Rebecca O Barnes; John Bartlett; Jane Carpenter; William E Grizzle; Randal N Johnston; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Leigh Murphy; Katherine Sexton; Lois Shepherd; Daniel Simeon-Dubach; Nikolajs Zeps; Brent Schacter
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Managing the Ethical Issues of Genomic Research using Pathology Specimens.

Authors:  Nikolajs Zeps; Marianna J Bledsoe
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2015-02

4.  Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of Egyptian physicians towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Douaa M Sayed; Walaa A Khairy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Felicity Callard; Matthew Broadbent; Mike Denis; Matthew Hotopf; Murat Soncul; Til Wykes; Simon Lovestone; Robert Stewart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A consumer register: an acceptable and cost-effective alternative for accessing patient populations.

Authors:  Jamie Bryant; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Elizabeth Fradgley; Breanne Hobden; Alison Zucca; Frans Henskens; Andrew Searles; Brad Webb; Christopher Oldmeadow
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  What proportion of patients with psychosis is willing to take part in research? A mental health electronic case register analysis.

Authors:  Rashmi Patel; Sherifat Oduola; Felicity Callard; Til Wykes; Matthew Broadbent; Robert Stewart; Thomas K J Craig; Philip McGuire
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  A survey of practices for the use of electronic health records to support research recruitment.

Authors:  Jihad S Obeid; Laura M Beskow; Marie Rape; Ramkiran Gouripeddi; R Anthony Black; James J Cimino; Peter J Embi; Chunhua Weng; Rebecca Marnocha; John B Buse
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-08

9.  Facilitating mental health research for patients, clinicians and researchers: a mixed-method study.

Authors:  D Robotham; S Waterman; S Oduola; C Papoulias; T Craig; T Wykes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  What is the impact of research champions on integrating research in mental health clinical practice? A quasiexperimental study in South London, UK.

Authors:  Sherifat Oduola; Til Wykes; Dan Robotham; Tom K J Craig
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.