Literature DB >> 24845206

Magnitude and relative distribution of kettlebell snatch force-time characteristics.

Jason P Lake1, Brandon S Hetzler, Mike A Lauder.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare mechanical output from kettlebell snatch and 2-handed kettlebell swing exercise. Twenty-two men performed 3 sets of 8 kettlebell snatch and 2-handed swing exercise with a 24-kg kettlebell on a force platform. Vertical and horizontal net impulse, mean force, displacement, the magnitude, and rate of work performed displacing the kettlebell-and-lifter center of mass (CM), phase durations and impulse ratio (horizontal to resultant) were calculated from force data. The results of repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that: (a) vertical CM displacement was significantly larger during kettlebell snatch exercise (22 ± 4 vs. 18 ± 5 cm, p = 0.001), and vertical CM displacement was significantly larger than horizontal CM displacement, regardless of exercise (20 ± 3 vs. 7 ± 1 cm, p < 0.0001); (b) the magnitude (253 ± 73 vs. 3 ± 1 J, p < 0.0001) and rate of work (714 ± 288 vs. 11 ± 4 W, p < 0.0001) performed to vertically displace the CM was larger than the horizontal equivalent in both exercises, and the magnitude (5 ± 2 vs. 1 ± 1 J, p < 0.0001) and rate of work (18 ± 7 vs. 4 ± 3 W, p < 0.0001) performed to horizontally displace the CM during 2-handed swing exercise was significantly larger than the kettlebell snatch equivalent; (c) this was underpinned by the magnitude of horizontal impulse (29 ± 7 vs. 18 ± 7 N·s, p < 0.0001) and the impulse ratio (23 vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). These findings reveal that, apart from the greater emphasis, 2-handed swing exercise places on horizontal mechanical output, the mechanical output of the 2 exercises is similar. Research shows that 2-handed swing exercise improves maximum and explosive strength. These results suggest that strength and conditioning coaches should consider using kettlebell snatch and 2-handed swing exercise interchangeably for the ballistic component of athlete strength and conditioning programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24845206     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  KINEMATIC AND KINETIC VARIABLES DIFFER BETWEEN KETTLEBELL SWING STYLES.

Authors:  Garrett S Bullock; Abigail C Schmitt; Jason M Shutt; Gray Cook; Robert J Butler
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-06

2.  Eight Weeks of Kettlebell Swing Training Does not Improve Sprint Performance in Recreationally Active Females.

Authors:  Michael E Holmstrup; Brock T Jensen; William S Evans; Emily C Marshall
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  External kinetics of the kettlebell snatch in amateur lifters.

Authors:  James A Ross; Justin W L Keogh; Cameron J Wilson; Christian Lorenzen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Kettlebell training in clinical practice: a scoping review.

Authors:  Neil J Meigh; Justin W L Keogh; Ben Schram; Wayne A Hing
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.