Literature DB >> 24845147

We work with them? Healthcare workers interpretation of organizational relations mined from electronic health records.

You Chen1, Nancy Lorenzi2, Steve Nyemba3, Jonathan S Schildcrout4, Bradley Malin5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Models of healthcare organizations (HCOs) are often defined up front by a select few administrative officials and managers. However, given the size and complexity of modern healthcare systems, this practice does not scale easily. The goal of this work is to investigate the extent to which organizational relationships can be automatically learned from utilization patterns of electronic health record (EHR) systems.
METHOD: We designed an online survey to solicit the perspectives of employees of a large academic medical center. We surveyed employees from two administrative areas: (1) Coding & Charge Entry and (2) Medical Information Services and two clinical areas: (3) Anesthesiology and (4) Psychiatry. To test our hypotheses we selected two administrative units that have work-related responsibilities with electronic records; however, for the clinical areas we selected two disciplines with very different patient responsibilities and whose accesses and people who accessed were similar. We provided each group of employees with questions regarding the chance of interaction between areas in the medical center in the form of association rules (e.g., Given someone from Coding & Charge Entry accessed a patient's record, what is the chance that someone from Medical Information Services access the same record?). We compared the respondent predictions with the rules learned from actual EHR utilization using linear-mixed effects regression models.
RESULTS: The findings from our survey confirm that medical center employees can distinguish between association rules of high and non-high likelihood when their own area is involved. Moreover, they can make such distinctions between for any HCO area in this survey. It was further observed that, with respect to highly likely interactions, respondents from certain areas were significantly better than other respondents at making such distinctions and certain areas' associations were more distinguishable than others.
CONCLUSIONS: These results illustrate that EHR utilization patterns may be consistent with the expectations of HCO employees. Our findings show that certain areas in the HCO are easier than others for employees to assess, which suggests that automated learning strategies may yield more accurate models of healthcare organizations than those based on the perspectives of a select few individuals.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data mining; Electronic health records; Organizational modeling; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24845147      PMCID: PMC4159755          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  44 in total

1.  Authorisation and access control for electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Bernd Blobel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry.

Authors:  Emily M Campbell; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone; Richard H Dykstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  Review article: Effectiveness of patient care teams and the role of clinical expertise and coordination: a literature review.

Authors:  Marije Bosch; Marjan J Faber; Juliette Cruijsberg; Gerlienke E Voerman; Sheila Leatherman; Richard P T M Grol; Marlies Hulscher; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Grounding information security in healthcare.

Authors:  Ana Ferreira; Luis Antunes; David Chadwick; Ricardo Correia
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Nurses' information management across complex health care organizations.

Authors:  Ragnhild Hellesø; Lena Sorensen; Margarethe Lorensen
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Clinical system security: interim guidelines.

Authors:  R Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

8.  A method to implement fine-grained access control for personal health records through standard relational database queries.

Authors:  Walter V Sujansky; Sam A Faus; Ethan Stone; Patricia Flatley Brennan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Physicians' responses to computerized drug-drug interaction alerts for outpatients.

Authors:  Min-Li Yeh; Ying-Jui Chang; Po-Yen Wang; Yu-Chuan Jack Li; Chien-Yeh Hsu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Specializing network analysis to detect anomalous insider actions.

Authors:  You Chen; Steve Nyemba; Wen Zhang; Bradley Malin
Journal:  Secur Inform       Date:  2012-02-27
View more
  10 in total

1.  Learning Clinical Workflows to Identify Subgroups of Heart Failure Patients.

Authors:  Chao Yan; You Chen; Bo Li; David Liebovitz; Bradley Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Building bridges across electronic health record systems through inferred phenotypic topics.

Authors:  You Chen; Joydeep Ghosh; Cosmin Adrian Bejan; Carl A Gunter; Siddharth Gupta; Abel Kho; David Liebovitz; Jimeng Sun; Joshua Denny; Bradley Malin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Progress in Biomedical Knowledge Discovery: A 25-year Retrospective.

Authors:  L Sacchi; J H Holmes
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-02

4.  Better Usability and Technical Stability Could Lead to Better Work-Related Well-Being among Physicians.

Authors:  Suvi Vainiomäki; Anna-Mari Aalto; Tinja Lääveri; Timo Sinervo; Marko Elovainio; Pekka Mäntyselkä; Hannele Hyppönen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Using electronic health record audit logs to study clinical activity: a systematic review of aims, measures, and methods.

Authors:  Adam Rule; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Interaction patterns of trauma providers are associated with length of stay.

Authors:  You Chen; Mayur B Patel; Candace D McNaughton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Identifying collaborative care teams through electronic medical record utilization patterns.

Authors:  You Chen; Nancy M Lorenzi; Warren S Sandberg; Kelly Wolgast; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Mining tasks and task characteristics from electronic health record audit logs with unsupervised machine learning.

Authors:  Bob Chen; Wael Alrifai; Cheng Gao; Barrett Jones; Laurie Novak; Nancy Lorenzi; Daniel France; Bradley Malin; You Chen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Visualizing collaborative electronic health record usage for hospitalized patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Nicholas D Soulakis; Matthew B Carson; Young Ji Lee; Daniel H Schneider; Connor T Skeehan; Denise M Scholtens
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Leveraging electronic health record documentation for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis team identification.

Authors:  Gayle Shier Kricke; Matthew B Carson; Young Ji Lee; Corrine Benacka; R Kannan Mutharasan; Faraz S Ahmad; Preeti Kansal; Clyde W Yancy; Allen S Anderson; Nicholas D Soulakis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.