Literature DB >> 24844470

Prognostic value of grading masticator space involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to MR imaging findings.

Guo-Yi Zhang1, Ying Huang, Xiu-Yu Cai, Xiang-Ping Chen, Tao Xu, Jing Wu, Wei-Hong Wei, Li-Zhi Liu, Ze-Li Huang, Miao-Miao Zhou, Shi-Tong Xia, Yue-Jian Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To derive a suitable method for grading masticator space invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma on the basis of magnetic resonance (MR) images and to determine its prognostic value in patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent were acquired, 808 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy were analyzed retrospectively. The anatomic sites of masticator space involvement were identified with MR imaging. Overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the log-rank test. Potential prognostic factors were identified by means of multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Masticator space involvement was diagnosed in 163 of 808 patients (20.2%). Patients with lateral invasion (involvement of the lateral pterygoid muscle of the masticator space and beyond) had significantly poorer overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival than those with medial invasion (involvement of the medial pterygoid muscle of the masticator space) (P = .035 and P = .026, respectively). Furthermore, their overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were significantly poorer compared with patients with stage T2 or T3 disease (all P ≤ .023) but similar to patients with stage T4 disease. The grade of masticator space involvement was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (all P ≤ .023).
CONCLUSION: Masticator space involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma should be graded as medial (stage T2 disease) or lateral (stage T4 disease). This can facilitate staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and may be a suitable prognostic indicator of survival. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24844470     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: relationship between invasion of the prevertebral space and distant metastases.

Authors:  Qi-Yong Ai; Chen-Wen Hu; Kunwar S Bhatia; Darren M C Poon; Edwin P Hui; Frankie K F Mo; Benjamin King Hong Law; Macy Tong; Brigette B Ma; Anthony T C Chan; Ann D King
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Radiology research in mainland China in the past 10 years: a survey of original articles published in Radiology and European Radiology.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Yun Fei Wang; Zhen Lu Yang; U Joseph Schoepf; Jiaqian Xu; Guang Ming Lu; Enzhong Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Proposal for the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jian Ji Pan; Wai Tong Ng; Jing Feng Zong; Lucy L K Chan; Brian O'Sullivan; Shao Jun Lin; Henry C K Sze; Yun Bin Chen; Horace C W Choi; Qiao Juan Guo; Wai Kuen Kan; You Ping Xiao; Xu Wei; Quynh Thu Le; Christine M Glastonbury; A Dimitrios Colevas; Randal S Weber; Jatin P Shah; Anne W M Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prognostic value of MRI-derived masticator space involvement in IMRT-treated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Youping Xiao; Jianji Pan; Yunbin Chen; Shaojun Lin; Ying Chen; Jingfeng Zong; Yanhong Fang; Qiaojuan Guo; Bijuan Chen; Linbo Tang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  The prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma involving masticatory muscles: a retrospective analysis for revising T subclassifications.

Authors:  Youping Xiao; Jianji Pan; Yunbin Chen; Shaojun Lin; Jingfeng Zong; Ying Chen; Yanhong Fang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Comparing the 7th and 8th editions of UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the IMRT era.

Authors:  Tao He; Ruo-Nan Yan; Hua-Ying Chen; Yuan-Yuan Zeng; Zhong-Zheng Xiang; Fang Liu; Bian-Fei Shao; Jia-Chun Ma; Xi-Ran Wang; Lei Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Prognostic Value and Grading of MRI-Based T Category in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Without Lymph Node Metastasis Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Yu-Pei Chen; Ling-Long Tang; Wen-Na Zhang; Yan-Ping Mao; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Li-Zhi Liu; Wen-Fei Li; Xu Liu; Guan-Qun Zhou; Rui Guo; Hai-Qiang Mai; Jian-Yong Shao; Ai-Hua Lin; Li Li; Jun Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  A new staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Authors:  Min Kang; Pingting Zhou; Jianxiong Long; Guisheng Li; Haolin Yan; Guosheng Feng; Meilian Liu; Jinxian Zhu; Rensheng Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.