Literature DB >> 24844386

Influence of an antidiabetic drug on biomechanical and histological parameters around implants in type 2 diabetic rats.

Chikoto Hashiguchi1, Shin-ichiro Kawamoto, Takayuki Kasai, Yasuhiro Nishi, Eiichi Nagaoka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has a deleterious effect on dental implant integration into alveolar bone, thought to arise from impaired osteoblast function and consequent reduced bone turnover. However, whether controlling blood glucose with antidiabetic drugs is sufficient to improve implant integration is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate implant integration using diabetic rats with/without an antidiabetic drug.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium screws were surgically implanted in each tibia of 20 Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats and 5 nondiabetic control rats. After 3 or 9 weeks, osseointegration was determined by testing the removal torque required to displace the screw and by histological analysis of various parameters of bone formation.
RESULTS: Removal torque was significantly higher in the nondiabetic control group than in GK rats, irrespective of whether the GK rats had received voglibose. Histology revealed that single-labeled surface area was still high in the GK rats at 9 weeks but had peaked and diminished in control rats. Bone-implant contact area was reduced in GK rats.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling blood glucose, voglibose was unable to reverse the bone metabolic effects of DM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24844386     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes pharmacotherapy and effects on the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Evangelia Kalaitzoglou; John L Fowlkes; Iuliana Popescu; Kathryn M Thrailkill
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.876

2.  Supportive angiogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells and endothelial cells in monolayer and co-cultures.

Authors:  Florian Böhrnsen; Henning Schliephake
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 6.344

3.  Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?

Authors:  Gang Yue; Husham Edani; Andrew Sullivan; Shuying Jiang; Hamed Kazerani; Mohammad Ali Saghiri
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-02-26

4.  Genipin and insulin combined treatment improves implant osseointegration in type 2 diabetic rats.

Authors:  Jiajia Zhang; Ya-Nan Wang; Tingting Jia; Haiyun Huang; Dongjiao Zhang; Xin Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Effects of Stress on Osteoblast Proliferation and Differentiation Based on Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Wntβ-Catenin Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Hanming Zhong; Xiaoyu Yang; Shitie Li; Xin Lei
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.009

Review 6.  Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Osseointegration of Dental Implants and Biological Functions of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chao Liang; Xiu Liu; Yuwei Yan; Rongxin Sun; Jun Li; Wei Geng
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.131

7.  The relative contribution of bone microarchitecture and matrix composition to implant fixation strength in rats.

Authors:  Kyle D Anderson; Frank C Ko; Spencer Fullam; Amarjit S Virdi; Markus A Wimmer; Dale R Sumner; Ryan D Ross
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.