Literature DB >> 24844341

The flaws of laser Doppler in negative-pressure wound therapy research.

Nicolas Kairinos1, Andrew McKune, Michael Solomons, Donald A Hudson, Delawir Kahn.   

Abstract

Recent studies, using modalities other than laser Doppler, have indicated that perfusion during negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is reduced, contrary to world literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the measuring technique of the laser Doppler could be influenced by the compressive nature of NPWT dressings and whether this could explain the conflicting findings. A hypothesis that it may be possible for laser Doppler to record similar readings to those obtained during NPWT by merely compressing tissues manually was tested on 12 NPWT dressings, with each undergoing an alternating series of manual compressive forces and NPWT (-125 mmHg). During the periods of NPWT (n = 12), the mean perfusion recording increased in five experiments, reduced in six, and remained unchanged in one. During the period when manual pressure was applied (n = 12), there was a mean increase in perfusion in six experiments and a reduction in six. The type of change in perfusion (increase or decrease) was the same for both NPWT and manual pressure in 10 of the 12 experiments. In conclusion, laser Doppler can incorrectly record increased perfusion when tissues are compressed, implying that it is flawed in the field of NPWT research as tissues are always compressed to some degree by the NPWT dressing.
© 2014 by the Wound Healing Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24844341     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  7 in total

Review 1.  Deconstructing negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Shadi Lalezari; Christine J Lee; Anna A Borovikova; Derek A Banyard; Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth; Alan D Widgerow
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Wound Penetration of Cefazolin, Ciprofloxacin, Piperacillin, Tazobactam, and Vancomycin During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew P Rowan; Krista L Niece; Julie A Rizzo; Kevin S Akers
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Computational modelling of wounded tissue subject to negative pressure wound therapy following trans-femoral amputation.

Authors:  B Zeybek; S Li; J W Fernandez; S Stapley; V V Silberschmidt; Y Liu
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-05-28

4.  Comment on "Novel imaging methods reveal positive impact of topical negative pressure application on tissue perfusion in an in vivo skin model".

Authors:  Nicolas Kairinos; Donald Anthony Hudson; Michael Wayne Solomons
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Superior Enhancement of Cutaneous Microcirculation Due to "Cyclic" Application of a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device in Humans - Local and Remote Effects.

Authors:  Alexander Sogorski; Amira Becker; Mehran Dadras; Christoph Wallner; Johannes Maximillian Wagner; Maxi V Glinski; Marcus Lehnhardt; Björn Behr
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy: Regulating blood flow perfusion and microvessel maturation through microvascular pericytes.

Authors:  Zhanjun Ma; Zonghuan Li; Kangquan Shou; Chao Jian; Pengcheng Li; Yahui Niu; Baiwen Qi; Aixi Yu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.101

7.  Novel imaging methods reveal positive impact of topical negative pressure application on tissue perfusion in an in vivo skin model.

Authors:  Wibke Müller-Seubert; Sascha Roth; Theresa Hauck; Andreas Arkudas; Raymund E Horch; Ingo Ludolph
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.