Here, we show a novel solid-solid-vapor (SSV) growth mechanism whereby epitaxial growth of heterogeneous semiconductor nanowires takes place by evaporation-induced cation exchange. During heating of PbSe-CdSe nanodumbbells inside a transmission electron microscope (TEM), we observed that PbSe nanocrystals grew epitaxially at the expense of CdSe nanodomains driven by evaporation of Cd. Analysis of atomic-resolution TEM observations and detailed atomistic simulations reveals that the growth process is mediated by vacancies.
Here, we show a novel solid-solid-vapor (SSV) growth mechanism whereby epitaxial growth of heterogeneous semiconductor nanowires takes place by evaporation-induced cation exchange. During heating of PbSe-CdSe nanodumbbells inside a transmission electron microscope (TEM), we observed that PbSe nanocrystals grew epitaxially at the expense of CdSe nanodomains driven by evaporation of Cd. Analysis of atomic-resolution TEM observations and detailed atomistic simulations reveals that the growth process is mediated by vacancies.
Both the
synthesis and design
of heteronanocrystals (HNCs) have undergone a rapid development, whereby
PbSe and CdSe NCs are key materials acting as functional building
blocks within a wide variety of heterogeneous nanostructures.[1−8] PbSe-CdSe HNCs are of particular interest as they can exhibit properties
different from individual PbSe and CdSe dots. The presence of two
semiconductor quantum dots connected via a well-defined interface
opens new possibilities for tailoring the optoelectronic properties.[1,4−7,9] Heat treatment of HNCs can induce
new interface designs,[5,10−13] exemplified by the transformation
of PbSe/CdSe core/shell systems into PbSe-CdSe bihemispheres.[5] Here, we report an in situ heating-induced epitaxial
PbSe NC domain growth at the solid–solid PbSe-CdSe nanointerface
through cation exchange. We show that Pb replaces Cd at the PbSe/CdSe
interface, resulting in growth of the PbSe phase at the expense of
the CdSe phase. The incorporated Pb is originating from Pb-oleate
present as excess stabilizer at the surface of the mature PbSe/CdSe
HNCs.Vapor–liquid–solid (VLS)[14−16] and vapor–solid–solid
(VSS)[17,18] growth mechanisms are commonly applied nowadays
in nanochemistry to epitaxially grow semiconductor nanowires from
the elements dissolved in a liquid (VLS) or solid (VSS) domain. In
analogy with these growth mechanisms, the currently observed process
could be called solid–solid–vapor (SSV) growth as the
Cd evaporates, either as neutrally charged Cd atoms or in a molecular
complex such as Cd-oleate.Figure 1a
shows a HAADF-STEM image (high
angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy)
of CdSe-PbSe dumbbell HNCs, consisting of CdSe nanorods with PbSe
tips at both ends. In this imaging mode, the intensity scales with
Z2, where Z is the atomic number. As Pb has a higher Z
than Cd, PbSe NCs exhibit brighter contrast than the CdSe nanorods.
When the HNCs were heated to 160 °C with a heating rate of 10
degrees/min and annealed at this temperature for 5 min, the bright
contrast corresponding to PbSe was observed not only at the tips but
also extended gradually inside the nanorod domain (solid arrows in
Figure 1b), showing that the PbSe phase grows
at the expense of the CdSe phase. When the HNCs were heated to 200
°C with the same heating rate and annealed at this temperature
for 5 min, the bright contrast was observed over the entire nanorod
in some nanorods (solid arrows in Figure 1c).
The evolution of this growth was seen to initiate mostly from one
PbSe tip domain (Supporting Information Movies S1 and S2), though it can also proceed from both PbSe tip
domains (dashed arrows in Figure 1b and c).
Figure 1
HAADF-STEM
images and chemical mapping of the nanodumbbells before
and after heating. (a) HAADF-STEM image of CdSe-PbSe nanodumbbells.
The PbSe tips exhibit brighter contrast than the CdSe nanorods due
to Z-contrast. (b,c) Dumbbell HNCs at 160 °C (b) and at 200 °C
(c), showing gradual extension of PbSe domains at the expense of CdSe.
A heating rate of 10 degrees/min was used in the in situ studies and
the HNCs were annealed at the indicated temperatures for 5 min before
imaging. Dumbbell HNCs with solid arrows transformed totally to brighter
contrast with heating. This phenomenon occurred mostly from one side,
though it can proceed from both PbSe domains as well (dumbbell with
dashed arrows in panel c). (d–o) HAADF-STEM images and corresponding
STEM-EDX elemental maps of dumbbell heteronanostructures annealed
for 5 min at temperatures of (d–g) 100 °C, (h–k)
170 °C, and (l–o) 200 °C. In panels d–g, HNCs
are in original dumbbell state with PbSe tips and CdSe nanorod. In
panels h–k, a partially transformed nanorod is present. In
panels l–o, two PbSe-CdSe HNCs became full PbSe domains. The
Se remains in place during the transformation. Note that the contrast
is maximized in each individual image; hence, intensities of different
mappings cannot be directly compared. Quantitative analyses are provided
in the Supporting Information.
HAADF-STEM
images and chemical mapping of the nanodumbbells before
and after heating. (a) HAADF-STEM image of CdSe-PbSe nanodumbbells.
The PbSe tips exhibit brighter contrast than the CdSe nanorods due
to Z-contrast. (b,c) Dumbbell HNCs at 160 °C (b) and at 200 °C
(c), showing gradual extension of PbSe domains at the expense of CdSe.
A heating rate of 10 degrees/min was used in the in situ studies and
the HNCs were annealed at the indicated temperatures for 5 min before
imaging. Dumbbell HNCs with solid arrows transformed totally to brighter
contrast with heating. This phenomenon occurred mostly from one side,
though it can proceed from both PbSe domains as well (dumbbell with
dashed arrows in panel c). (d–o) HAADF-STEM images and corresponding
STEM-EDX elemental maps of dumbbell heteronanostructures annealed
for 5 min at temperatures of (d–g) 100 °C, (h–k)
170 °C, and (l–o) 200 °C. In panels d–g, HNCs
are in original dumbbell state with PbSe tips and CdSe nanorod. In
panels h–k, a partially transformed nanorod is present. In
panels l–o, two PbSe-CdSe HNCs became full PbSe domains. The
Se remains in place during the transformation. Note that the contrast
is maximized in each individual image; hence, intensities of different
mappings cannot be directly compared. Quantitative analyses are provided
in the Supporting Information.Chemical mapping by means of energy-dispersive
X-ray spectrometry
(EDX) using a Chemi-STEM detector (see Methods and Supporting Information) was performed
to provide further evidence of the chemical transition. Figure 1d–g shows the initial state of the HNCs at
100 °C with CdSe nanorods and PbSe tips. Figure 1f shows that Pb is also present at the lateral surfaces of
the CdSe nanorods, pointing to adsorbed Pb-oleate molecules. The dumbbell
depicted with an arrow in Figure 1h underwent
a transformation, after which half the nanorod exhibited a bright
contrast. With annealing at 170 °C for 5 min, the elemental maps
of this dumbbell in Figure 1i–k shows
that Pb is indeed present in the bright contrast regions and that
Cd is absent. We, therefore, conclude that Cd started to sublimate
(as neutral Cd atoms or in a molecular form) and that at the same
time, PbSe was formed by Pb incorporation. Upon further heating to
200 °C and 5 min annealing at this temperature, two nanorods
(indicated with arrows in Figure 1l) exhibited
a bright contrast over their entire length. Elemental maps (Figure 1m–o) showed that Cd is no longer present
and the nanorod completely transformed into PbSe. Disappearance of
Cd from a nanostructure was also reported by De Trizio et al.[12] during a heating of sandwich-morphology CdSe/Cu3P/CdSe HNCs. Note that a complete transformation occurred
very rarely (in about one percent of the cases). Further heating of
partially cation-exchanged nanodumbbells led to dissociation of the
domains (Supporting Information Movie S3).
The transformations took place everywhere on the substrate, not only
in areas that were previously examined with the electron beam. The
field of view was changed frequently in order to avoid beam effects
when monitoring the evolution of the HNCs.As a result of the
cation exchange from CdSe to PbSe, the crystal
structure transformed epitaxially from hexagonal wurtzite (WZ) to
cubic rock-salt (RS). Figure 2 and Supporting Information Movie S4 show this transformation
at atomic resolution. When the HNC was heated from 160 °C (Figure 2a) to 180 °C (Figure 2b) with a heating rate of 10 degrees/min, the brighter intensity
corresponding to PbSe advanced into the CdSe region. The PbSeRS (200)
lattice spacings started to appear along the nanorod domain instead
of the CdSeWZ (0002) lattice spacings, as confirmed by the Fourier
transformation (FT) patterns shown in the insets. It is clear that
the cation exchange takes place at the PbSe/CdSe interface and propagates
epitaxially (layer by layer) along the WZ ⟨0001⟩ direction.
Two types of interfaces were observed: {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe and {111}PbSe/{0001}CdSe,
similar to the interfaces previously reported in the literature for
PbSe/CdSe and PbS/CdS HNCs.[7,19] Sometimes both types
of interfaces were observed within one single dumbbell NC. Figure 2c shows a HNC with the interfaces of {111}PbSe/{0001}CdSe
on the left (Figure 2d) and {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe
on the right (Figure 2f). It is clear from
Figure 2 that epitaxial PbSe growth inside
CdSe domain via cation exchange can advance from both PbSe/CdSe interfaces.
Figure 2
Atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM images of CdSe-PbSe
HNCs. PbSe has
cubic rock salt (RS) crystal structure with a lattice constant[20] of 6.13 Å, whereas CdSe has a hexagonal
wurtzite (WZ) crystal structure with lattice parameters[21]a = 4.29 Å and c = 7.01 Å. The CdSe WZ (0002) spacing is 3.5 Å
and PbSe RS (200) spacing is 3.1 Å. With heating from 160 °C
(a) to 180 °C (b) with a heating rate of 10 degrees/min, WZ CdSe
nanorods started to transform to RS PbSe. The insets are Fourier transforms
(FTs) taken from the white squares in each image. The spot depicted
with an arrow in the inset FT of panel a corresponds to WZ CdSe(0002)
spacing. It disappeared in the inset FT of panel b, confirming the
WZ to RS transformation. Supporting Information Movie S4 shows the transformation with atomic resolution. (c) HAADF-STEM
image of a PbSe-CdSe dumbbell HNC. Stacking faults and a dislocation
are present in the CdSe nanorod domain. The interface at the left-hand
side is {111}PbSe/{0001}CdSe (panel d), whereas the interface at the
right-hand side is {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe (panel f).
Considering the source of Pb that is required for the epitaxial
PbSe growth in CdSe via cation exchange, we note that PbSe NCs with
excess Pb surface atoms (off-stoichiometric) have been reported in
the literature.[22−24] Pb atoms (possibly Pb-oleate molecules) are also
present along the CdSe nanorods (Figure 1f).
From the quantification of the elemental maps (see Methods and Supporting Information Table S1), it was found that the PbSe tips contained an excess of
Pb, having a cation/anion ratio of 1.3 ± 0.2. After the transformation,
the cation/anion ratio at these PbSe tips reduced to 1.02 ± 0.14.
These findings indicate Pb diffusion from PbSe tips toward the PbSe/CdSe
interface. Supporting Information Movie
S4 verifies this, whereby the bright Pb contrast propagates into the
initially CdSe nanorod, indicating the epitaxial growth of PbSe, whereas
the (PbSe) tip domain starts to lose some of its brightness, indicating
that excess Pb is consumed.Atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM images of CdSe-PbSe
HNCs. PbSe has
cubic rock salt (RS) crystal structure with a lattice constant[20] of 6.13 Å, whereas CdSe has a hexagonal
wurtzite (WZ) crystal structure with lattice parameters[21]a = 4.29 Å and c = 7.01 Å. The CdSeWZ (0002) spacing is 3.5 Å
and PbSeRS (200) spacing is 3.1 Å. With heating from 160 °C
(a) to 180 °C (b) with a heating rate of 10 degrees/min, WZ CdSe
nanorods started to transform to RS PbSe. The insets are Fourier transforms
(FTs) taken from the white squares in each image. The spot depicted
with an arrow in the inset FT of panel a corresponds to WZ CdSe(0002)
spacing. It disappeared in the inset FT of panel b, confirming the
WZ to RS transformation. Supporting Information Movie S4 shows the transformation with atomic resolution. (c) HAADF-STEM
image of a PbSe-CdSe dumbbell HNC. Stacking faults and a dislocation
are present in the CdSe nanorod domain. The interface at the left-hand
side is {111}PbSe/{0001}CdSe (panel d), whereas the interface at the
right-hand side is {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe (panel f).In the nanorod domains attached to the PbSe tips
where cation exchange
took place, the cation/anion ratio in the rod was reduced to 0.93
± 0.11 due to Cd sublimation. That most nanodumbbells were not
completely transformed must, hence, be due to the depletion of the
source of Pb. The excess Pb atoms at the surfaces of the heteronanointerface
diffuse toward the interface to form new layers of PbSe, but this
process stops when all excess Pb has been depleted. As mentioned above,
a complete transformation of the nanorods occurred only rarely. From
an estimate of the number of Pb-oleate molecules that could cover
the surface of the nanodumbbells (assuming a high surface density
of 5 Pb-oleate molecules per square nanometer), it was found that
for the typical dimensions of the nanodumbbells in this study, the
number of surface Pb atoms is not sufficient to replace all the Cd
atoms in the CdSe domain (the number of Cd sites is at least two times
larger). Therefore, when a complete transformation did occur, likely
also Pb atoms from neighboring HNCs contributed to the growth of the
PbSe domain. This is in agreement with the observation that when the
nanodumbbells were lying isolated on the SiN support membrane, the
growth process did take place but always resulted in only a partial
transformation of the HNCs as shown in Supporting
Information Figure S21.In order to better understand
the nanoscopic growth mechanism at
the PbSe/CdSe interface, force-field-based MD simulations were performed
on HNC models, taking into account various possibilities for the PbSe/CdSe
interfacial arrangements (details in Methods and Supporting Information). Surfactant
molecules are not included in the simulation models, and therefore,
the MD simulations serve only to study the structure of, and atomic
mobility at the PbSe/CdSe interfaces. The isolated nanodumbbell models
were equilibrated at 300 and 500 K for 5 ns sequentially. Figure 3a shows the final configuration of a nanodumbbell
model after 5 ns at 500 K. This model has both types of the interfaces
({100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe and {111}PbSe/{0001}CdSe) in one HNC.
Figure 3
Force-field
MD simulations of the PbSe-CdSe nanodumbbells. (a)
Overview image showing the final configuration of a dumbbell obtained
after MD simulation at a temperature of 500 K for 5 ns. The ball–stick
presentation was used to show the structure of the interfaces. The
yellow, purple, and blue spheres are Se, Cd, and Pb atoms, respectively.
(b) Magnified image of the {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe interface at the left-hand
side of the dumbbell, and (c) magnified image of the {0001}CdSe/{111}PbSe
interface at the right-hand side of the dumbbell. (d,e,f) The map
of the root mean square displacement (RMSD) for each atom for the
same PbSe-CdSe dumbbell model at 500 K. (d) The whole PbSe-CdSe dumbbell,
(e) the anion sublattice, and (f) the cation sublattice. The dumbbell
was cut so that both of the surface and inner atoms can be seen. The
pure red atoms correspond to those having a RMSD larger than 0.84
Å.
Force-field
MD simulations of the PbSe-CdSe nanodumbbells. (a)
Overview image showing the final configuration of a dumbbell obtained
after MD simulation at a temperature of 500 K for 5 ns. The ball–stick
presentation was used to show the structure of the interfaces. The
yellow, purple, and blue spheres are Se, Cd, and Pb atoms, respectively.
(b) Magnified image of the {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe interface at the left-hand
side of the dumbbell, and (c) magnified image of the {0001}CdSe/{111}PbSe
interface at the right-hand side of the dumbbell. (d,e,f) The map
of the root mean square displacement (RMSD) for each atom for the
same PbSe-CdSe dumbbell model at 500 K. (d) The whole PbSe-CdSe dumbbell,
(e) the anion sublattice, and (f) the cation sublattice. The dumbbell
was cut so that both of the surface and inner atoms can be seen. The
pure red atoms correspond to those having a RMSD larger than 0.84
Å.The nanodumbbell model shown in
Figure 3 is structurally and morphologically
stable at temperatures up to
500 K. The middle part of the CdSe rod and both PbSe tips retain their
initial WZ and RS structures, respectively. Structural disorder was
mainly found in the CdSe domains near the interfaces. Compared to
the {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe interface, the CdSe domain near the {111}PbSe/{0001}CdSe
interface is structurally more ordered. In the latter case, most of
the Cd and Se atoms remain at the WZ lattice sites, which is likely
due to the fact that the cation-terminated {0001}CdSe surface and
the anion-terminated {111}PbSe surface form a continuous polar/polar
interface, whereas the lattice mismatch is small. In contrast, the
{100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe interface is a nonpolar/polar interface, which
leads to stronger distortions in the atomic lattice due to Coulombic
interactions. The simulations therefore suggest that the transformation
at the {100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe interface will be more efficient than
at the {111}PbSe/{0001}CdSe interface, although this could not be
confirmed by the experiments as the orientation of the two crystals
could be determined only in a limited number of cases. Not only is
the atomic structure more disordered in the CdSe domains near the
{100}PbSe/{0001}CdSe interfaces (see Supporting
Information Figure S24 for a planar view of the atomic bilayers
parallel to the interface), the simulations also show an unusually
high mobility of the Cd atoms in the few first atomic layers from
the PbSe/CdSe interface, as evidenced by the map of the root mean
square displacement (RMSD) for each atom (Figure 3d–f). Those atoms with the highest mobility (red atoms)
are mostly Cd atoms near the interfaces or on the surface, indicating
that the cation exchange occurs only very close to the interface.The experimental observations and the MD simulations suggest that
the transformation is mediated by vacancies in the Cd and Pb sublattices;
evaporation of Cd results in Cd vacancies at the CdSe surface. After
migration of these Cd vacancies to the PbSe/CdSe interface, Pb atoms
can jump into the vacant sites, thereby leaving behind vacancies on
the Pb sublattice, which will eventually recombine with excess Pb
absorbed at the surface of the PbSe domain. Density functional theory
(DFT) calculations of defect energies (see Section F in Supporting Information) confirm that upon evaporation
of Cd, both in CdSe and PbSe the defect energetics are ruled by vacancies.
The DFT calculations also show (Supporting Information Table S10) that the Se-Frenkel defect energy (Se vacancy + Se interstitial)
is considerably higher (6.00 for CdSe and 3.80 eV for PbSe) than the
Cd-Frenkel and Pb-Frenkel defect energies (3.16 and 3.30 eV, respectively).
It is, thus, energetically much more expensive to create defects on
the Se sublattice. Because the Se sublattice is not much affected
by the cation exchange that takes place on the (Pb,Cd) sublattice,
the crystallographic orientation relation between the CdSe and PbSe
nanodomains is retained during the transformation. This is the reason
that the growth process is epitaxial in nature.The most important
driving force for the growth process is the
evaporation of Cd. It is well known that a chemical reaction can be
efficiently driven into one direction by bringing one reaction product
in the gas phase. Assuming that the excess Pb originates from Pb-oleate
coverage of the HNC and that the Cd evaporates in a molecular form,
the chemical reaction can be summarized as follows:In
the CdSe lattice, the Cd and Se atoms can be modeled as ions.
Bader charge analysis (details in Section E of the Supporting Information) performed on the electronic charge
density obtained from DFT calculations shows that the effective charge
of the Cd cation in CdSe bulk is approximately +0.8e. However, the Cd will evaporate only as a neutral species. Because
the transition from a charged Cd+0.8 ion to a neutral Cd0 atom would require the nanocrystal to donate electrons, we
consider it more likely that Cd at the surface of the nanocrystal
binds to the surfactants (e.g., oleate), followed by evaporation.
We mention here that heating in vacuum is an efficient method to detach
surfactants from nanocrystals.[20,25]From the available
experimental and simulation data, a mechanism
can now be deduced to describe the cation exchange. All processes
take place close to the interfaces in a fast and volatile manner as
demonstrated by Supporting Information Movie
S4. The growth mechanism is shown schematically in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information and can be summarized
as follows. (i) Cd sublimates from the surface of the CdSe nanodomains,
whereby Cd vacancies are formed. (ii) The Cd vacancies occupy positions
at the CdSe side of the PbSe/CdSe interface (Figure 3 and Supporting Information Figure
S24). (iii) Cation replacement takes place as Pb atoms jump into vacant
Cd sites in a layer by layer fashion, resulting in epitaxial growth
of RS PbSe at the expense of WZ CdSe. (iv) The jumping Pb atoms leave
behind vacancies, which migrate to the PbSe surface. (v) The Pb vacancies
at the surface recombine with Pb ions from adsorbed Pb-oleate molecules.
The oleate molecule remains adsorbed at the PbSe surface and possibly
migrates to the CdSe domain where it combines with Cd and evaporates
as Cd-oleate. (vi) The process is halted when the excess Pb (in the
form of Pb-oleate molecules) in the system is depleted.The
atomistic mechanism described here most likely also takes place
when HNCs undergo cation exchange in colloidal solutions, whereby
instead of evaporating, the metal-molecule complex is dissolved in
the solution. In the current solid–solid–vapor (SSV)
growth mechanism, one solid phase grows epitaxially at the expense
of another solid phase, efficiently driven by evaporation of one element
(here, Cd) with simultaneous supply of another element (here, Pb coordinated
with a molecule). Our results show that SSV growth can provide an
alternative path for growing heterogeneous semiconductor nanowires,
especially when the lattices have a partly ionic character, and therefore
holds promise for generating new families of heterogeneous nanostructures.
Methods
The synthesis of PbSe/CdSe dumbbell nanostructures is detailed
in the Supporting Information. TEM specimens
were prepared by dropcasting 8 μL of the NC colloidal solution
onto a MEMS microhot plate with electron-transparent SiN membranes,
which was mounted onto a DENSsolutions low drift TEM heating holder.[25] After dropcasting, the sample was plasma cleaned
for 10 s in order to remove deposits from the solution that prevent
high-resolution imaging in the TEM. The in situ experiments were performed
in a 80–300 FEI Titan microscope equipped with a Chemi-STEM
EDX detection system. During HAADF-STEM imaging, the microscope was
operated at 300 kV. The camera length used in the experiments equals
91 mm in order to avoid diffraction effects and to guarantee Z-contrast
imaging. In HAADF-STEM imaging, the intensity approximately scales
with Z2. As Pb has a higher Z number than Cd, the PbSe
domains appear with higher intensity in HAADF-STEM images in comparison
to the CdSe domains.The Chemi-STEM EDX experiments were performed
using the same holder
and in the same 80–300 FEI Titan microscope but operated at
a lower acceleration voltage of 200 kV to reduce beam damage during
mapping. A beam current of approximately 250 pA was used during acquisition.
A representative spectrum is shown in Supporting
Information Figure S20. In the quantification of the elemental
maps, 18 PbSe NC maps were used to determine the cation/anion ratio
at the PbSe tips at the initial state. For the PbSe tips from where
cation exchange proceeded, the elemental composition of 10 different
PbSe tips was quantified. For the nanorod domains attached to the
PbSe tips where cation exchange took place, the elemental composition
of 10 different nanorod (transformed)-domains was quantified. Additional
TEM images, chemical maps, and quantitative analysis are provided
in Figures S2–S19 and Tables S1–S6 of the Supporting Information.For the force field
MD simulations, a new interaction potential
model for the Pb–Cd–Se system was developed. The potential
was found to accurately describe physical parameters such as lattice
parameters, elastic constants, and the relative stability of phases.
Details of the potential model (Supporting Information Table S7) and a description of the nanodumbbell models are given
in Section E of the Supporting Information. For simulations of the nanodumbbells, Coulomb and short-range interactions
were calculated by taking into account all atom pairs. The equations
of motion were integrated using the velocity Verlet algorithm with
a time step of 1 fs. Periodic boundary conditions were not used and
the nanodumbbell models were isolated in vacuum. Simulations of 5
ns were carried out in the NVT ensemble and 1 ns was used for equilibration.All density functional theory (DFT) calculations on defect energies
and energies of mixed PbSe-CdSe phases were carried out using the
first-principles’ Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Program (VASP)[26] using the projector augmented wave (PAW) method.[27] The generalized gradient approximation (GGA)
formulated by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) was employed for
the exchange and correlation energy terms.[28] The cutoff energy of the wave functions was 350.0 eV. The cutoff
energy of the augmentation functions was about 500.0 eV. The electronic
wave functions were sampled on a 4 × 4 × 2 grid using the
Monkhorst and Pack method with 8 to 20 k-points depending
on different symmetries of supercells (108 atoms). Structural optimizations
were performed for both lattice parameters and coordinates of atoms.
Different k-meshes and cutoff energies for waves
were tested to have a good convergence (<2 meV/atom). Details are
given in the Supporting Information.
Authors: Ann I Persson; Magnus W Larsson; Stig Stenström; B Jonas Ohlsson; Lars Samuelson; L Reine Wallenberg Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2004-09-19 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Dominika Grodzińska; Wiel H Evers; Renee Dorland; Jos van Rijssel; Marijn A van Huis; Andries Meijerink; Celso de Mello Donegá; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh Journal: Small Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Anil O Yalcin; Bart de Nijs; Zhaochuan Fan; Frans D Tichelaar; Daniël Vanmaekelbergh; Alfons van Blaaderen; Thijs J H Vlugt; Marijn A van Huis; Henny W Zandbergen Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Albert Figuerola; Marijn van Huis; Marco Zanella; Alessandro Genovese; Sergio Marras; Andrea Falqui; Henny W Zandbergen; Roberto Cingolani; Liberato Manna Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Marijn A van Huis; Albert Figuerola; Changming Fang; Armand Béché; Henny W Zandbergen; Liberato Manna Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Renyong Tu; Yi Xie; Giovanni Bertoni; Aidin Lak; Roberto Gaspari; Arnaldo Rapallo; Andrea Cavalli; Luca De Trizio; Liberato Manna Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Svetlana Polivtseva; Julia Kois; Tatiana Kruzhilina; Reelika Kaupmees; Mihhail Klopov; Palanivel Molaiyan; Heleen van Gog; Marijn A van Huis; Olga Volobujeva Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 5.719
Authors: Carlo van Overbeek; Joep L Peters; Susan A P van Rossum; Marc Smits; Marijn A van Huis; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Bastiaan B V Salzmann; Jur de Wit; Chen Li; Daniel Arenas-Esteban; Sara Bals; Andries Meijerink; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 4.126